A Histopathologic Approach to Uterine Niche: What to Expect and to Report in Hysteroscopy-Resected Isthmocele Specimens

Abstract

As one of the emerging complications of caesarean sections (CSs), pathologists will have an important role in handling samples of uterine niches. An isthmocele is a defect at the site of a previous CS scar resulting in a variety of symptoms and niche-related subfertility. There is a deficiency in the literature of the histopathologic features of hysteroscopy-resected isthmocele ridges. Our aim is to fill this gap to highlight what to expect to see and what important findings to report to guide gynecologists to the results of hysteroscopic isthmoplasty in relation to symptoms improvement, fertility restoration, and potential complications. We found 22 cases of hysteroscopy-resected isthmoceles by performing a retrospective review study. The majority of the women were symptomatic with secondary infertility. The resected isthmocele edges were lined by endocervical, endometrial, and isthmic mucosa either combined or isolated depending on each case. Isthmoceles could be classified depending on the predominant lining mucosa into endocervical-isthmoendocervical (low) and endometrial-isthmic (high-intermediate) niches. This could be correlated with certain symptoms. The edges showed variably thickened fibrous and fibromuscular stromal tissue with characteristic thick-walled blood vessels. Some cases showed miscellaneous findings such as hemosiderin pigments with foreign body giant cell reaction and placental implantation site tissue reflecting a previous history of surgical repair and scar pregnancy. Cauterization artifacts may impose interpretation challenges for pathologists. Utility of certain special stains helps delineate the nature of badly cauterized tissues. It is important to report certain histologic findings in isthmocele samples to correlate with clinical findings and guide gynecologists.