SingerG, StöhrR, CopeL. Patterns of p53 mutations separate ovarian serous borderline tumors and low- and highgrade carcinomas and provide support for a new model of ovarian carcinogenesis: a mutational analysis with Immunohistochemical correlation. Am J Surg Pathol.2005; 29: 218–224.
2.
ShihI, KurmanRJ. Ovarian tumorigenesis: a proposed model based on morphological and molecular genetic analysis. Am J Pathol.2004; 164: 1511–1518.
3.
KurmanRJ, ShihI. Pathogenesis of ovarian cancer: lessons from morphology and molecular biology and their clinical implications. Int J Gynecol Pathol.2008; 27: 151–160.
4.
VogelsteinB, FearonER, HamiltonSR. Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med.1988; 319: 525–532.
5.
CirisanoFDJr, RobboySJ, DodgeRK. Epidemiologic and surgicopathologic findings of papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared to endometrioid carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol.1999; 74: 385–394.
6.
CirisanoFDJr, RobboySJ, DodgeRK. The outcome of stage I-II clinically and surgically staged papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared with endome-trioid carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol.2000; 77: 55–65.
7.
RonnettBM, ZainoR, EllensonLH, KurmanRJ. Endometrial carcinoma. In KurmanRJ, ed. Blaustein's Pathology of the Female Genital Tract.New York, NY: Springer;2002: 501–559.
8.
KurmanRJ, KaminskiPF, NorrisHJ. The behavior of endome-trial hyperplasia. A long-term study of “untreated” hyperplasia in 170 patients. Cancer.1985; 56: 403–412.
9.
BergeronC, NogalesFF, MasseroliM. A multicentric European study testing the reproducibility of the WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasia with a proposal of a simplified working classification for biopsy and curettage specimens. Am J Surg Pathol.1999; 23: 1102–1108.
10.
KendallBS, RonnettBM, IsacsonC. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, atypical hyper-plasia, and well-differentiated carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol.1998; 22: 1012–1019.
11.
ShermanME, RonnettBM, IoffeOB. Reproducibility of biopsy diagnoses of endometrial hyperplasia: evidence supporting a simplified classification. Int J Gynecol Pathol.2008; 27: 318–325.
12.
BaakJP, KurverPH, DiegenbachPC. Discrimination of hyperplasia and carcinoma of the endometrium by quantitative microscopy-a feasibility study. Histopathology.1981; 5: 61–68.
13.
BaakJP. Further evaluation of the practical applicability of nuclear morphometry for the prediction of the outcome of atypical endometrial hyperplasia. Anal Quant Cytol Histol.1986; 8: 46–48.
14.
MutterGL. Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN): will it bring order to chaos? The Endometrial Collaborative Group. Gynecol Oncol.2000; 76: 287–290.
15.
MutterGL, ZainoRJ, BaakJP. Benign endometrial hyper-plasia sequence and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Pathol.2007; 26: 103–114.
16.
LaceyJVJr, MutterGL, NucciMR. Risk of subsequent endometrial carcinoma associated with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia classification of endometrial biopsies. Cancer.2008; 113: 2073–2081.
17.
MutterGL, LinMC, FitzgeraldJT. Altered PTEN expression as a diagnostic marker for the earliest endometrial pre-cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst.2000; 92: 924–930.
18.
MutterGL. Pten, a protean tumor suppressor. Am J Pathol.2001; 158: 1895–1898.
19.
MyersMP, PassI, BattyIH. The lipid phosphatase activity of PTEN is critical for its tumor supressor function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.1998; 95: 13513–13518.
20.
LevineRL, CargileCB, BlazesMS. PTEN mutations and microsatellite instability in complex atypical hyperplasia, a precursor lesion to uterine endometrioid carcinoma. Cancer Res.1998; 58: 3254–3258.
21.
YoshinagaK, SasanoH, FurukawaT. The PTEN, BAX, and IGFIIR genes are mutated in endometrial atypical hyper-plasia. Jpn J Cancer Res.1998; 89: 985–990.
22.
MaxwellGL, RisingerJI, GumbsC. Mutation of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene in endometrial hyperplasias. Cancer Res.1998; 58: 2500–2503.
23.
ZainoRJ. Endometrial hyperplasia: is it time for a quantum leap to a new classification?Int J Gynecol Pathol.2000; 19: 314–321.
24.
CirpanT, TerekMC, MgoyiL. Immunohistochemical evaluation of PTEN protein in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia compared to endometrial adenocarcinoma and proliferative phase endometrium. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol.2006; 27: 389–392.
CaduffRF, JohnstonCM, FrankTS. Mutations of the Ki-ras oncogene in carcinoma of the endometrium. Am J Pathol.1995; 146: 182–188.
27.
EnomotoT, InoueM, PerantoniAO. K-ras activation in premalignant and malignant epithelial lesions of the human uterus. Cancer Res.1991; 51: 5308–5314.
28.
KobayashiK, SagaeS, NishiokaY. Mutations of the beta-catenin gene in endometrial carcinomas. Jpn J Cancer Res.1999; 90: 55–59.
29.
MacDonaldND, SalvesenHB, RyanA. Frequency and prognostic impact of microsatellite instability in a large population-based study of endometrial carcinomas. Cancer Res.2000; 60: 1750–1752.
30.
SaegusaM, HashimuraM, YoshidaT. beta-Catenin mutations and aberrant nuclear expression during endometrial tumorigenesis. Br J Cancer.2001; 84: 209–217.
31.
LaxSF, KendallB, TashiroH. The frequency of p53, K-ras mutations, and microsatellite instability differs in uterine endometrioid and serous carcinoma: evidence of distinct molecular genetic pathways. Cancer.2000; 88: 814–824.
32.
DugganBD, FelixJC, MuderspachLI. Early mutational activation of the c-Ki-ras oncogene in endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Res.1994; 54: 1604–1607.
33.
DugganBD, FelixJC, MuderspachLI. Microsatellite instability in sporadic endometrial carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst.1994; 86: 1216–1221.
34.
HendricksonM, RossJ, EifelP. Uterine papillary serous carcinoma: a highly malignant form of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol.1982; 6: 93–108.
35.
ShermanME, BittermanP, RosensheinNB. Uterine serous carcinoma. A morphologically diverse neoplasm with unifying clinicopathologic features. Am J Surg Pathol.1992; 16: 600–610.
36.
AmbrosRA, ShermanME, ZahnCM. Endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma: a distinctive lesion specifically associated with tumors displaying serous differentiation. Hum Pathol.1995; 26: 1260–1267.
37.
ShermanME, BurME, KurmanRJ. p53 in endometrial cancer and its putative precursors: evidence for diverse pathways of tumorigenesis. Hum Pathol.1995; 26: 1268–1274.
38.
TashiroH, IsacsonC, LevineR. p53 gene mutations are common in uterine serous carcinoma and occur early in their pathogenesis. Am J Pathol.1997; 150: 177–185.
39.
HarrisCC, HollsteinM. Clinical implications of the p53 tumor-suppressor gene. N Engl J Med.1993; 329: 1318–1327.
40.
CarcangiuML, ChambersJT. Uterine papillary serous carcinoma: a study on 108 cases with emphasis on the prognostic significance of associated endometrioid carcinoma, absence of invasion, and concomitant ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol.1992; 47: 298–305.
LeeKR, BelinsonJL. Papillary serous adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: a clinicopathologic study of 19 cases. Gynecol Oncol.1992; 46: 51–54.
43.
LiangSX, ChambersSK, ChengL. Endometrial glandular dysplasia: a putative precursor lesion of uterine papillary serous carcinoma. Part II: molecular features. Int J Surg Pathol.2004; 12: 319–331.
44.
ZhengW, LiangSX, YuH. Endometrial glandular dys-plasia: a newly defined precursor lesion of uterine papillary serous carcinoma. Part I: morphologic features. Int J Surg Pathol.2004; 12: 207–223.
45.
JiaL, LiuY, YiX. Endometrial glandular dysplasia with frequent p53 gene mutation: a genetic evidence supporting its precancer nature for endometrial serous carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res.2008; 14: 2263–2269.
46.
BurksRT, ShermanME, KurmanRJ. Micropapillary serous carcinoma of the ovary. A distinctive low-grade carcinoma related to serous borderline tumors. Am J Surg Pathol.1996; 20: 1319–1330.
47.
SeidmanJD, KurmanRJ. Subclassification of serous borderline tumors of the ovary into benign and malignant types. A clinicopathologic study of 65 advanced stage cases. Am J Surg Pathol.1996; 20: 1331–1345.
48.
LongacreTA, McKenneyJK, TazelaarHD. Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (borderline tumors): outcome-based study of 276 patients with long-term (> or =5-year) follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol.2005; 29: 707–723.
49.
McKenneyJK, BalzerBL, LongacreTA. Lymph node involvement in ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (borderline tumors): pathology, prognosis, and proposed classification. Am J Surg Pathol.2006; 30: 614–624.
50.
SeidmanJD, KurmanRJ. Ovarian serous borderline tumors: a critical review of the literature with emphasis on prognostic indicators. Hum Pathol.2000; 31: 539–557.
51.
NakayamaK, NakayamaN, KurmanRJ. Sequence mutations and amplification of PIK3CA and AKT2 genes in purified ovarian serous neoplasms. Cancer Biol Ther.2006; 5: 779–785.
52.
SiebenNL, MacropoulosP, RoemenGM. In ovarian neoplasms, BRAF, but not KRAS, mutations are restricted to low-grade serous tumours. J Pathol.2004; 202: 336–340.
53.
SingerG, KurmanRJ, ChangHW. Diverse tumori-genic pathways in ovarian serous carcinoma. Am J Pathol.2002; 160: 1223–1228.
54.
SingerG, ShihI, TruskinovskyA. Mutational analysis of K-ras segregates ovarian serous carcinomas into two types: invasive MPSC (low-grade tumor) and conventional serous carcinoma (high-grade tumor). Int J Gynecol Pathol.2003; 22: 37–41.
55.
SingerG, OldtRIII, CohenY. Mutations in BRAF and KRAS characterize the development of low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst.2003; 95: 484–486.
56.
MayrD, HirschmannA, LohrsU. KRAS and BRAF mutations in ovarian tumors: a comprehensive study of invasive carcinomas, borderline tumors and extraovarian implants. Gynecol Oncol.2006; 103: 883–887.
57.
HoCL, KurmanRJ, DehariR. Mutations of BRAF and KRAS precede the development of ovarian serous borderline tumors. Cancer Res.2004; 64: 6915–6918.
58.
KohlerMF, MarksJR, WisemanRW. Spectrum of mutation and frequency of allelic deletion of the p53 gene in ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst.1993; 85: 1513–1519.
59.
KupryjanczykJ, ThorAD, BeauchampR. p53 gene mutations and protein accumulation in human ovarian cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.1993; 90: 4961–4965.
60.
SalaniR, KurmanRJ, GiuntoliR. Assessment of TP53 mutation using purified tissue samples of ovarian serous carcinomas reveals a higher mutation rate than previously reported and does not correlate with drug resistance. Int J Gynecol Cancer.2008; 18: 487–491.
61.
BellDA, ScullyRE. Early de novo ovarian carcinoma. A study of fourteen cases. Cancer.1994; 73: 1859–1864.
62.
HutsonR, RamsdaleJ, WellsM. p53 protein expression in putative precursor lesions of epithelial ovarian cancer. Histopathology.1995; 27: 367–371.
63.
WernessBA, ParvatiyarP, RamusSJ. Ovarian carcinoma in situ with germline BRCA1 mutation and loss of heterozygosity at BRCA1 and TP53. J Natl Cancer Inst.2000; 92: 1088–1091.
64.
PiekJM, van DiestPJ, ZweemerRP. Dysplastic changes in prophylactically removed fallopian tubes of women predisposed to developing ovarian cancer. J Pathol.2001; 195: 451–456.
65.
CrumCP, DrapkinR, MironA. The distal fallopian tube: a new model for pelvic serous carcinogenesis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol.2007; 19: 3–9.
66.
JarboeE, FolkinsA, NucciMR. Serous carcinogenesis in the fallopian tube: a descriptive classification. Int J Gynecol Pathol.2008; 27: 1–9.
67.
MedeirosF, MutoMG, LeeY. The tubal fimbria is a preferred site for early adenocarcinoma in women with familial ovarian cancer syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol.2006; 30: 230–236.
68.
FolkinsAK, JarboeEA, SaleemuddinA. A candidate precursor to pelvic serous cancer (p53 signature) and its prevalence in ovaries and fallopian tubes from women with BRCA mutations. Gynecol Oncol.2008; 109: 168–173.