1. Safrin R, Bark C.Surgical pathology signout. Routine review of every case by a second pathologist. Am J Surg Pathol17:1190-1192, 1994
2.
2. Ramsey AD, Gallagher PJ. Local audit of surgical pathology: 18 months' experience of peer-reviewbased quality assessment in an English teaching hospital. Am J Surg Pathol16:476-482, 1992
3.
3. Lind A, Bewtra C, et al. Prospective peer review in surgical pathology. Am J Clin Pathol104:560-566, 1995
4.
4. Wakely S, Baxendine-Jones J, et al. Aberrant diagnoses by individual surgical pathologists. Am J Surg Pathol22:77-82, 1998
5.
5. Abt A, Abt L.The effect of interinstitutional anatomic pathology consultation on patient care. Arch Pathol Lab Med119:514-517, 1995
6.
6. McBroom H, Ramsay A.The clinicopathologic meeting. A means of auditing diagnostic performance. Am J Surg Pathol17:75-80, 1993
7.
7. Foucar E.Error identification. A surgical pathology dilemma. Am J Surg Pathol22:1-5, 1998
8.
8. Oxley D.Error and judgment. JAMA277:1651-1651, 1997: A book review of Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error and Judgment in Engineering, by Henry Petroski. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1994
