A journal special section comprising three related articles recently appeared in the professional mental health literature. This tripartite special section maintains that when managed care companies reduce the cost of mental health services by substituting time-limited counseling for longer term treatment, a condition identified as "invisible rationing" results. The articles offer ethical, legal, and practice implications for marriage andfamily counselors operating within a managed care context.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Austad, C. S.
, & Berman, W. H. (1991). Managed health care and the evolution of psychotherapy. In C. S. Austad & W. H. Berman (Eds.), Psychotherapy in managed health care: The optimal use of time and resources (pp. 3-18). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2.
Budman, S. H.
, & Gurman, A. S. (1983). The practice of brief therapy. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 14, 277-292.
3.
Budman, S. H.
, & Gurman, A. S. (1988). The theory and practice of brief therapy. New York: Guilford.
4.
Hoyt, M. F.
(1991). Teaching and learning short-term psychotherapy. In C. S. Austad & W. H. Berman (Eds.), Psychotherapy in managed health care: The optimal use of time and resources (pp. 98-108). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5.
Miller, I. J.
(1996a). Time-limited brief therapy has gone too far: The result is invisible rationing. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 567-576.
6.
Miller, I. J.
(1996b). Some "short-term therapy values" are a formula for invisible rationing. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 577-582.
7.
Miller, I. J.
(1996c). Ethical and liability issues concerning invisible rationing. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 583-587.
