Clinical Supervision as Intersectional: A Guide for Implementing Intersectional Supervision Across Mental Health Professions

Abstract

Clinical supervision is central to clinical training. Yet, traditional supervision models often overlook the interplay of power, identity, and systemic influence. While many supervision frameworks exist, few offer guidance on applying intersectional principles in practice. This paper addresses that gap by proposing the use of the Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis (IBPA) framework to guide clinical supervision. Practical examples of IBPA-informed supervision are provided, along with implications for training, evaluation, and reflective practice. This model seeks to foster more responsive, equity-informed supervisory relationships across diverse clinical settings.

Keywords

intersectionality clinical supervision multiculturalism intersectionality-based policy analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ancis

J. R.

Marshall

D. S.

(2010). Using a multicultural framework to assess supervisees’ perceptions of culturally competent supervision. Journal of Counseling & Development, 88(3), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2010.tb00023.x

Aponte

H. J.

Carlsen

J. C.

(2009). An instrument for person-of-the-therapist supervision. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 35(4), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00127.x

Asakura

Maurer

(2018). Attending to social justice in clinical social work: Supervision as a pedagogical space. Clinical Social Work Journal, 46(4), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-018-0667-4

Atewologun

Mahalingam

(2016). Intersectional reflexivity: Methodological challenges and possibilities for diversity research. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016(1), 16059. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2016.16059abstract.

Berger

Quiros

Benavidez-Hatzis

J. R.

(2017). The intersection of identities in supervision for trauma-informed practice: Challenges and strategies. The Clinical Supervisor, 37(1), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2017.1376299

Bernard

J. M.

(1979). Supervisor training: A discrimination model. Counselor Education and Supervision, 19(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.1979.tb00906.x

Bernard

J. M.

(1997). The discrimination model. In Watkins, Jr.

C. E.

(Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 310–327). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Bernard

J. M.

Goodyear

R. K.

(2019). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (6th ed.). Pearson.

Bobele

Biever

J. L.

Solórzano

B. H.

Bluntzer

L. H.

(2014). Postmodern approaches to supervision. In Todd

T. C.

Storm

C. L.

(Eds.), The complete systemic supervisor: Context, philosophy, and pragmatics (pp. 255–273). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394259601.ch13

10.

Borders

L. D.

Glosoff

H. L.

Welfare

L. E.

Hays

D. G.

DeKruyf

Fernando

D. M.

Page

(2014). Best practices in clinical supervision: Evolution of a counseling specialty. The Clinical Supervisor, 33(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2014.905225

11.

Bronfenbrenner

(1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.

12.

Brown

E. J.

Lang

Sharma-Patel

(2023). A trauma-informed approach to supervision and consultation. In Terjesen

M. D.

Vecchio

T. D.

(Eds.), Handbook of training and supervision in cognitive behavioral therapy (pp. 141–156). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33735-2_8

13.

Burnham

(2012). Developments in Social GRRRAAACCEEESSS: visible – invisible and voiced – unvoiced. In Krause

I.-B.

(Ed.), Culture and reflexivity in systemic psychotherapy: Mutual perspectives (pp. 139–160). Karnac.

14.

Calvert

F. L.

Crowe

T. P.

Grenyer

B. F.

(2016). Dialogical reflexivity in supervision: An experiential learning process for enhancing reflective and relational competencies. The Clinical Supervisor, 35(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2015.1135840

15.

Campinha-Bacote J. (2018). Cultural competemility: A paradigm shift in the cultural competence versus cultural humility debate—part I. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 24(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol24No01PPT20

16.

Chan

C. D.

Cor

D. N.

Band

M. P.

(2018). Privilege and oppression in counselor education: An intersectionality framework. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 46, 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12092

17.

Chopra

(2013). All supervision is multicultural: A review of literature on the need for multicultural supervision in counseling. Psychological Studies, 58(3), 335–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-013-0206-x

18.

Christiansen

A. T.

Thomas

Kafescioglu

Karakurt

Lowe

Smith

Wittenborn

(2011). Multicultural supervision: Lessons learned about an ongoing struggle. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 37(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00138.x

19.

Collins

P. H.

(2000). Gender, black feminism, and black political economy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 568(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620056800105 https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620056800105

20.

Collins

P. H.

(2009). Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.

21.

Collins

P. H.

Bilge

(2016). Intersectionality. Polity Press.

22.

Collins

P. H.

Bilge

(2020). Intersectionality, 2nd Ed. Polity Press.

23.

Creaner

(2014). Current trends in clinical supervision: Introduction to the special section. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 27(4), 325–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2014.965904

24.

Crenshaw

(1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(8), 139. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8

25.

Crenshaw

(1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

26.

D'Andrea

Daniels

(1997). Multicultural counseling supervision: Central issues, theoretical considerations, and practical strategies. In Pope-Davis

D. B.

Coleman

H. L. K.

(Eds.), Multicultural counseling competencies: Assessment, education and training, and supervision (pp. 290–309). Sage Publications, Inc.

27.

D’Aniello

Nguyen

H. N.

Piercy

F. P.

(2016). Cultural sensitivity as an MFT common factor. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 44(5), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2016.1223565

28.

Davis

D. E.

DeBlaere

Owen

Hook

J. N.

Rivera

D. P.

Choe

Van Tongeren

D. R.

Worthington

E. L.

Placeres

(2018). The multicultural orientation framework: A narrative review. Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.), 55(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000160

29.

De Stefano

Hutman

Gazzola

(2017). Putting on the face: A qualitative study of power dynamics in clinical supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 36(2), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2017.1295893

30.

Dollarhide

C. T.

Hale

S. C.

Stone-Sabali

(2021). A new model for social justice supervision. Journal of Counseling & Development, 99(1), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12358

31.

Falender

C. A.

Shafranske

E. P.

Falicov

C. J.

(Eds.). (2014). Multiculturalism and diversity in clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14370-000

32.

Falicov

C. J.

(2014). Psychotherapy and supervision as cultural encounters: The multidimensional ecological comparative approach framework. In Falender

C. A.

Shafranske

E. P.

Falicov

C. J.

(Eds.), Multiculturalism and diversity in clinical supervision: A competency-based approach (pp. 29–58). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14370-002

33.

Fickling

M. J.

Tangen

J. L.

Graden

M. W.

Grays

(2019). Multicultural and social justice competence in clinical supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 58(4), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12159

34.

Fontes

L. A.

(1995). Sharevision: Collaborative supervision and self-care strategies for working with trauma. The Family Journal, 3(3), 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480795033012. Original work published 1995.

35.

Foucault

(1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-79, (Ed. Gordon

Colin

). Pantheon.

36.

Geller

J. D.

(2003). Self-Disclosure in psychoanalytic-existential therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 541–554. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10158

37.

Goodell

K. A.

Sudderth

B. G.

Allan

C. D.

(2011). The self of the therapist. In Metcalf

(Ed.), Marriage and family therapy: A practice oriented approach (pp. 21–38). Springer.

38.

Greene

J. H.

Flasch

P. S.

(2019). Integrating intersectionality into clinical supervision: A developmental model addressing broader definitions of multicultural competence. Journal of Counselor Preparation & Supervision, 12(4), 1–29. https://research.library.kutztown.edu/jcps/vol12/iss4/14

39.

Gutierrez

(2018). The role of intersectionality in marriage and family therapy multicultural supervision. American Journal of Family Therapy, 46(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2018.1437573

40.

Haans

Balke

(2018). Trauma-informed intercultural group supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 37(1), 158–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2017.1399495

41.

Hankivsky

(Ed.). (2012). An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework. Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, Simon Fraser University.

42.

Hankivsky

(2014). Intersectionality 101. The Institute for Intersectionality Research & Policy, SFU, 1–34.

43.

Hankivsky

Grace

Hunting

, et al. (2014). An intersectionality-based policy analysis framework: Critical reflections on a methodology for advancing equity. International Journal for Equity in Health, 13, 119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-014-0119-x

44.

Hays

P. A.

(1996). Addressing the complexities of culture and gender in counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 74(4), 332–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1996.tb01876.x

45.

Henretty

J. R.

Levitt

H. M.

(2010). The role of therapist self-disclosure in psychotherapy: A qualitative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.09.004

46.

Hernández

McDowell

(2010). Intersectionality, power, and relational safety in context: Key concepts in clinical supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017064

47.

Holland

(1999). Reflexivity. Human Relations, 52(4), 463–484. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016909508400

48.

Johnson

Duberley

(2003). Reflexivity in management research. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1279–1303. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00380

49.

Jones

R. G.

(2010). Putting privilege into practice through “intersectional reflexivity:” ruminations, interventions, and possibilities. Faculty Research and Creative Activity, 3, 122–125. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/commstudies_fac/3

50.

Jordan

(2018). Trauma-informed counseling supervision: Something every counselor should know about. Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 9(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507686.2018.1450274\

51.

Kapilashrami

Hankivsky

(2018). Intersectionality and why it matters to global health. Lancet (London, England), 391(10140), 2589–2591. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31431-4

52.

Koltz

R. L.

Odegard

M. A.

Feit

S. S.

Provost

Smith

(2012). Parallel process and isomorphism: A model for decision making in the supervisory triad. The Family Journal, 20(3), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480712448788

53.

Konstantoni

Kustatscher

Emejulu

(2016). Travelling with intersectionality across time, place and space. Children’s Geographies, 15(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2016.1255838

54.

Ladany

(2014). The ingredients of supervisor failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(11), 1094–1103. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22130

55.

Mangione

Mears

Vincent

Hawes

(2011). The supervisory relationship when women supervise women: An exploratory study of power, reflexivity, collaboration, and authenticity. The Clinical Supervisor, 30(2), 141–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2011.604272

56.

Manuel

(2006). Envisioning the possibilities for a good life: Exploring the public policy implications of intersectionality theory. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 28(3–4), 173–203. https://doi.org/10.1300/J501v28n03_08

57.

Morgan

M. M.

Sprenkle

D. H.

(2007). Toward a common-factors approach to supervision. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00001.x

58.

Olmos-Vega

F. M.

Stalmeijer

R. E.

Varpio

Kahlke

(2023). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE guide No. 149. Medical Teacher, 45(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287

59.

Peters

H. C.

(2017). Multicultural complexity: An intersectional lens for clinical supervision. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 39(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-017-9290-2 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-017-9290-2

60.

Ratts

M. J.

Singh

A. A.

Nassar-McMillan

Butler

S. K.

McCullough

J. R.

(2016). Multicultural and social justice counseling competencies: Guidelines for the counseling profession. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 44(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12035

61.

Rigazio-DiGilio

S. A.

(2014). Supervising couple and family therapy practitioners. In Watkins, Jr, &

C. E.

Milne

D. L.

(Eds.) The Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 662–647). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118846360.ch30

62.

Rober

(2017). Addressing the person of the therapist in supervision: The therapist's inner conversation method. Family Process, 56(2), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12220

63.

Rogers

Kelly

U. A.

(2011). Feminist intersectionality: Bringing social justice to health disparities research. Nursing Ethics, 18(3), 397–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733011398094

64.

Severs

Celis

Erzeel

(2016). Power, privilege and disadvantage: Intersectionality theory and political representation. Politics, 36(4), 346–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395716630987

65.

Soheilian

S. S.

Inman

A. G.

Klinger

R. S.

Isenberg

D. S.

Kulp

L. E.

(2014). Multicultural supervision: Supervisees’ reflections on culturally competent supervision. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 27(4), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2014.961408

66.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. SAMHSA’s Concept of Trauma and Guidance for a Trauma-Informed Approach. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4884. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2014.

67.

Tarshis

Baird

S. L.

(2021). Applying intersectionality in clinical supervision: A scoping review. The Clinical Supervisor, 40(2), 218–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2021.1919949

68.

Tohidian

N. B.

Quek

KM-T

(2017). Processes that inform multicultural supervision: A qualitative meta-analysis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 43(4), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12219

69.

Totsuka

(2014). Which aspects of social GGRRAAACCEEESSS grab you most?’ The social GGRRAAACCEEESSS exercise for a supervision group to promote therapists’ self-reflexivity. Journal of Family Therapy, 36, 86–106. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12026

70.

Ungar

(2006). Practicing as a postmodern supervisor. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2006.tb01588.x

71.

Watkins

C. E.

Jr., Davis

E. C.

Callahan

J. L.

(2018). On disruption, disorientation, and development in clinical supervision: A transformative learning perspective. The Clinical Supervisor, 37(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2017.1418694

72.

Weir

K. N.

(2009). Countering the isomorphic study of isomorphism: Coercive, mimetic and normative isomorphic trends in the training, supervision, and industry of marriage and family therapy. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 20(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/08975350802716517

73.

White

M. B.

Russell

C. S.

(1997). Examining the multifaceted notion of isomorphism in marriage and family therapy supervision: A quest for conceptual clarity. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 23(3), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1997.tb01040.x

74.

Wind

S. A.

Cook

R. M.

McKibben

W. B.

(2021). Supervisees’ of differing genders and races perceptions of power in supervision. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 34(2), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2020.1731791

75.

Wong

L. C. J.

Wong

P. T. P.

Ishiyama

F. I.

(2012). What helps and what hinders in cross-cultural clinical supervision: A critical incident study. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012442652

76.

Young

T. L.

Lambie

G. W.

Hutchinson

Thurston-Dyer

(2011). The integration of reflectivity in developmental supervision: Implications for clinical supervisors. The Clinical Supervisor, 30(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2011.532019

77.

Ziv-Beiman

(2013). Therapist self-disclosure as an integrative intervention. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031783