Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Family dynamics shape interactions and relationships within households, influencing mental health, academic achievement, and social adaptation across the lifespan. While extensive research has explored these dynamics in Western contexts, less is known about how South African families navigate cultural traditions alongside rapid societal changes. This study uses qualitative methods to explore urban South African family dynamics through the lens of Family Systems Theory. Data were gathered through focus group interviews conducted with seven diverse families (30 individuals) and semi-structured interviews with nine stakeholders. Thematic analysis identified five key themes: family structure, parental roles and support, power dynamics, family activities and bonding, and the impact of technology. Findings reveal that South African families function as interconnected emotional units, continuously adapting to evolving social landscapes while maintaining cultural values. The study sheds light on how families negotiate power, redefine parental roles, foster bonding through shared activities, and manage technological shifts across generations. These insights inform the development of culturally responsive family support strategies that acknowledge the systemic and dynamic nature of family life in South Africa.

Keywords

family dynamics family structure family systems theory parental support South African families

Introduction

Family is a fundamental social institution that exists beyond cultural boundaries and serves as the main setting for human development and socialization. Some researchers see families as a group of individuals bound together by blood, marriage, or adoption (Fingerman et al., 2020; Thebe & Maviza, 2019), while others define family by form, function, and interaction (Segrin & Flora, 2018). Rather than being restricted to biological ties, families are complex networks of emotional, psychological, and social links that influence both shared experiences and individual identities. To reflect the changing realities of modern society, modern definitions of family have broadened to encompass a variety of arrangements, including blended families, chosen families, and other unconventional arrangements (Chambers & Gracia, 2021). This inclusive perspective is emphasized by Bowen's Family Systems Theory, which places more emphasis on the relationships and interconnections within families than on their composition or structure. This method makes it possible to identify different family structures and dynamics (Becvar et al., 2023). Similarly, Dermott and Fowler (2020) posit that family is best thought of as a product of interpersonal relationships rather than referring to it as a unit that is made up of a set of members. They also refer to family practice, positing that it is not important to see the word family as a noun, and rather as an action, doing family (Dermott & Fowler, 2020)

Within the family system, dynamics emerge as patterns of interaction that shape relationships and influence individual development (Osher et al., 2021; Siegel, 2020). These dynamics are shaped by family structures, since individuals influence one another through shared values, experiences, emotional support, and beliefs. Each family has a unique emotional climate that is influenced by a range of personality traits, cultural norms, and economic variables. Family Systems Theory states that when one member of the family is affected, the entire family will be affected as well (Johnson & Ray, 2016).

Family dynamics refer to the patterns of interaction and relationships among family members (Syakhrani & Aslan, 2024). These are based on the needs of the individuals in the family and are thus not static. Due to the evolving needs and changing life situations, family dynamics are subject to changes. However, factors such as closeness of family members, ways of communicating needs, aims, and style of solving problems, support, emotional bonds, and responsibilities to each family member, and place of children within the marriage do affect the family dynamics. Furthermore, family dynamics revolve around emotions, which are intricate psychological phenomena that include behavioral manifestations, physiological responses, and subjective experiences (Barrett et al., 2019).

Family Systems Theory provides an understanding of these complex family interactions. It posits that families function as interconnected emotional units where changes in one part of the system affect all other parts (Becvar et al., 2023). The theory emphasizes that individual behavior cannot be understood in isolation but must be examined within the context of the entire family system, including multigenerational patterns and emotional processes (Keller & Noone, 2019).

The intersection of family structure and dynamics creates a unique framework through which individuals experience personal growth, develop coping mechanisms, and form their worldview. Research indicates that family dynamics significantly influence mental health outcomes, academic achievement, and social adjustment across the lifespan (Roksa & Kinsley, 2019; Umberson & Thomeer, 2020). However, despite this fundamental importance, there remains a notable gap in understanding how these dynamics manifest within the South African context, where families navigate unique cultural, social, and economic landscapes.

In South Africa, the urban-rural divide shapes the country's diverse social landscape. Urban areas include major metropolitan centers and are distinguished by higher population density, formal infrastructure, and multicultural environments that combine traditional behaviors with contemporary influences. These include cities like Johannesburg, Cape Town, and Durban, to mention just a few. These cities have both affluent neighborhoods and historically underprivileged townships, which provide better access to services and economic opportunities despite ongoing inequality. In contrast, rural South Africa includes traditional homelands, farming villages, and small towns where agricultural activities prevail, as well as traditional cultural practices. This geographical divide has a significant influence on family structures and power dynamics, with rural families generally maintaining more traditional hierarchical arrangements, whereas urban families typically adopt more flexible structures in response to economic needs and diverse cultural exposure.

This study uses Family Systems Theory to explore the family dynamics in urban South African families, with a focus on how traditional cultural values interact with contemporary social demands. Traditional cultural values in South African households include deeply ingrained beliefs, customs, and social expectations passed down through generations (Bihari, 2023). Some of the common characteristics of traditional cultural values are respect for elders, established gender and age hierarchies, communal responsibility, extended family networks, and distinct cultural norms guiding marriage, childrearing, and family decision-making. They frequently prioritize communal identity above individuals and place emphasis on preserving group harmony (Chua et al., 2019). These values provide continuity, identity, and a sense of belonging to family members.

However, contemporary societal demands are the expectations, pressures, and obligations that arise as a result of modern socioeconomic situations and international influences. These include the importance of formal education and professional employment, geographic mobility for economic opportunity, technological integration, shifting gender roles and expectations for gender equality, nuclear family housing arrangements (Haq, 2024). Furthermore, individual achievement, specialized skills, and adaptability are frequently emphasized in these demands (Picatoste et al., 2018). They reflect some of the essential requirements for optimal functioning in a rapidly changing, increasingly networked, and urbanized society (Volti & Croissant, 2024).

While substantial studies have been conducted on family dynamics in Western contexts, there has been little research into how South African families sustain cultural practices while adapting to rapid societal changes (Makiwane et al., 2017; Sooryamoorthy & Makhoba, 2016). Understanding these processes from a systems viewpoint is essential since South Africa continues to face considerable social transformation, urbanization, and economic issues that have a direct influence on family structures and relationships. Therefore, by addressing this knowledge gap, this study will contribute to the development of more effective, culturally appropriate family support strategies and interventions that recognize the systemic nature of family functioning.

Methodology

The research methodology used in this study was qualitative. According to Peck and Mummery (2018), qualitative research is an interaction with language; it is sometimes carried out in and around language. In order to understand the various meanings, social contexts, and historical views shared by multiple participants, the research is exploratory in nature (Creswell, 2017; Grover, 2015). According to Swaraj (2019), exploratory research is versatile and helpful for obtaining new ideas, asking questions, and evaluating things from new perspectives. This strategy is particularly appropriate for this research, which aims to explore and comprehend family dynamics in South Africa.

Using Family Systems Theory as a guiding framework, this study regards families as interconnected systems where each member's actions and experiences affect the whole. Family Systems Theory posits that individuals cannot be understood in isolation but must be viewed within the context of family relationships (Bowen, 1978). Therefore, this study's focus on family dynamics within different types of households reflects an intent to explore how diverse family structures and relational dynamics influence communication patterns. This theoretical lens informed the selection of participants and guided the analysis, focusing on the interactive and interdependent nature of family members’ roles and behaviors.

Participants

The study employed purposive sampling to select participants, including seven families and nine stakeholders. Families comprised of three Zulu-speaking families and four English-speaking families. Each English-speaking family represented a different racial group in South Africa (Black, Indian, White, and Colored). In total, 30 people made up the family participants. Family sizes ranged from three to five members, with ages spanning from 5 to 75 years. Each family's structure whether nuclear, single-parent, multigenerational, or adoptive was considered in understanding how different family compositions might influence family dynamics. Both adults and children participated, and all members of each family spoke either English or Zulu as their primary language and shared the same residence. Additionally, nine stakeholders (including healthcare professionals, educators, social workers, psychologists, religious leaders, and non-governmental organization workers) were interviewed to provide diverse perspectives on family dynamics. These stakeholders represented various racial and gender groups and were selected from a culturally diverse area in the Northeastern region of Johannesburg, Gauteng Province.

Data Collection

The study was conducted in Gauteng, where the most spoken languages are English and Zulu. Focus group interviews were conducted to gather data from the families. This method of data collection is effective particularly with children, as it can capture their viewpoints, unique concepts, and insights, which are frequently disregarded in conventional child research (Adler et al., 2019). The homes of each family served as the focus groups’ locations, which were selected to provide a welcoming and comfortable environment, particularly for young participants (Adler et al., 2019). The focus groups were audio recorded, they were then transcribed, the researcher then translated the Zulu transcripts to English, and all were analyzed.

Semi-structured interviews with stakeholders and focus group interviews with families allowed for an in-depth exploration of family dynamics. This approach, grounded in Family Systems Theory, enabled the study to capture individual perspectives while also understanding how these individual viewpoints interacted within the family unit as a whole. Interviews with stakeholders provided additional insight into family systems from professional and community-oriented perspectives, offering a broader context for family functioning.

Data Analysis

Data analysis employed thematic analysis (Clarke & Braun, 2017), examining recurring patterns and relational dynamics. This analysis followed a six-step process where the researcher first familiarized themselves with the data by reading and rereading it. The second step involved codes being generated. Then the initial themes were formed through identifying patterns in the data. The fourth step involved reviewing the themes. Then, in the fifth step, the researcher defined and named the themes by linking them to the patterns. Thematic analysis was guided by Family Systems Theory, and it focused on themes reflecting interdependent behaviors, relational patterns, and communication roles within families. Cross-analysis of stakeholder and family data allowed for a comparison of internal family perspectives with external views on family dynamics, highlighting how broader societal factors and family structure intersect to influence family systems and communication patterns (Momeni et al., 2018). This detailed thematic analysis provided an in-depth understanding of how family members interact and influence each other within their unique systems, helping to reveal the dynamic nature of family relationships in the South African context.

Results

After thematically analyzing data on family dynamics, five themes were highlighted. These were the following: (1) the structure and makeup of families; (2) parental roles, this theme had one subtheme, namely: parental support; (3) power dynamics in the family; (4) family activities and bonding; and (5) families and technology.

Theme 1: The Structure and Makeup of Families

Family structure refers to the constitution and organization of the members in a household, which influences caregiving methods, responsibilities, and family relationships. It takes several forms, including nuclear, extended, single-parent, mixed, and child-headed households, all influenced by cultural, social, and economic factors (Mohapanele, 2023). Handel (2018) highlights that family is not a set institution throughout time. He alludes to seeing family structure as the roles and boundaries that drive household interaction patterns, which are essential for understanding family dynamics (Handel, 2018; Minuchin, 2018).

Family structures in South Africa vary greatly, reflecting the country’s complicated history and cultural diversity. Extended families are prevalent, providing intergenerational support and shared caregiving obligations, especially in rural and low-income areas (Makiwane et al., 2017). These structures influence the communication patterns in the family, as noted in the following quote:

So, it's generational, like parents would share emotions between each other, or grandparents share between each other. And then, like the kids would share between each other. So, I would say it's very much like step wise, like hierarchical at certain levels, but it's difficult from, I would say from bottom up. So, from like children level to parents’ level, it's a bit difficult, but parents to children, maybe it's a bit easier…. (S2)

This highlights that the hierarchical structures in the family play a significant role in the dynamics of the family. However, urbanization and economic pressures have led to an increase in single-parent households and child-headed families, which has had a significant influence on familial responsibilities and support networks (Hall & Mokomane, 2018; Makiwane et al., 2017).

You dare not express yourself to my mom. … ‘these children are insulting me’. ‘I cannot be insulted I raised you up as a single mother’…. (ZF2-P2)

… he's the eldest amongst his own siblings, he's the eldest grandchild. … not being able to express himself because everybody expected him to be big brother. Like we can all come and cry to you and dump on you, …. (ZF2-P2)

The role and the responsibility one assumes in the family are also determined by the family structure. According to Family Systems Theory (Bowen, 1978), family structure serves as an interconnected system, with each member’s role and place influencing overall family dynamics. Changes in the family structure, such as parental separation or the addition of new members, can disrupt established interaction patterns and necessitate adaptation within the family system (Prime et al., 2020).

Theme 2: Parental Roles

The concept of parental roles is essential to understanding family dynamics, as it encompasses the various ways in which parents contribute to the well-being and development of their children (Ani, 2024; Gaspar et al., 2022). Parental roles are the various duties and obligations that parents assume when nurturing, guiding, and supporting their children within the family structure. These tasks include both physical and emotional care, such as guaranteeing children's safety, providing emotional support, facilitating socialization, and instilling moral and cognitive development (Masten & Palmer, 2019). This is evident in the quotation below from one family members:

It's funny, because actually very often we are not the ones to go to my mom. She'll pick it up and come to us about something. Are you OK?. (WF-P2)

Furthermore, Family Systems Theory posits that parents’ behaviors, values, and language act as cues that children internalize, shaping their interactions with others (Lindblom, 2017). This reciprocal influence is highlighted by one participant's observation that parents often unintentionally model undesirable behaviors:

… the type of language used, because they were sworn at by adults. (Yeah), they still believe it's the right language to use in this day and age. When reprimanding a child swearing at a child. And tomorrow it backfires because child also points a finger. (S1)

This quote indicates that parents sometimes use inappropriate language and discipline methods with their children, which then gets repeated by the children, leading to further conflicts. Parental duties do not remain static, they shift in reaction to changes in family structure, societal expectations, and cultural norms. Furthermore, these parental responsibilities require the establishment of boundaries, teaching discipline, and modelling behaviors that children absorb as they grow (Nelsen et al., 2019). As alluded to by one of the participants in the quotation below:

As a parent, I think it depends. I feel like it's good for them to talk but at the same time I feel like there should be boundaries as a parent, and there are things my children can discuss with me but there are certain things I feel like it's my life. They do not need to be involved in that way they are children. (ZF 1-P2)

In contemporary settings, parental roles have broadened to encompass not only the traditional caregiving chores but also more extensive obligations like addressing changing gender roles and handling the effects of technology on family life. Comprehending these responsibilities is essential to understanding how parents influence the dynamics of the family, such as emotional expression, communication styles, and the development of healthier connections amongst family members (Ambert, 2020).

Subtheme 1: Parental Support

Parental support like parental roles refers to the physical, emotional, and psychological assistance parents give their children, which is crucial for their growth and well-being. According to Goodall and Montgomery (2023), parental support entails providing children with a sense of stability, emotional support, encouragement, and guidance as they overcome obstacles and grow in their ability to self-respect and interact with others. It also involves making sure that resources are available for establishing a caring atmosphere that promotes positive conduct, emotional stability, and healthy growth. Parental support is important to comprehend how family dynamics affect children's outcomes. According to Ambert (2020), supportive parenting creates a sense of belonging within the family, it encourages open communication and enhances the parent‒child connection. Furthermore, it has a significant effect on how stress and conflict are managed within the family since parents are mediators and guides for effective communication and emotional regulation. The following quotes highlight how parental support influences the relationship between parents and children in the family.

Because when we are sad, they can make us happy. (ZF 2-P3)

We can be real and vulnerable with mom. (WF-P2)

But also that feeling that we don't want to disappoint daddy. At the back of our mind when we are happy daddy will be proud of us. Daddy is like the headmaster. (ZF 2-P2)

Thus, the theme of parental roles and support not only highlights the importance of parental involvement in a child’s life but also considers the complexities and changing nature of these roles in contemporary family dynamics. Studies have postulated a strong correlation between the efficacy of parental support and favorable outcomes for children, such as emotional stability, scholastic performance, and good general health (Barger et al., 2019; Bubic et al., 2021). These insights underscore the need to understand parental roles within the broader context of familial, cultural, and societal influences. This means understanding that parenting doesn’t happen in isolation but is shaped by multiple interconnected layers of influence. This greater understanding can assist in the development of more effective family support networks as well as the avoidance of inappropriate judgments of parenting approaches outside of their context. It may also help parents realize how different factors influence their parenting decisions, allowing them to make more conscious decisions about which influences to accept or change.

Theme 3: Power Dynamics in the Family

Power dynamics describe the patterns of influence, power, and decision-making that define family interactions, dispute resolution, and role expectations (Allen, 2023; Recchia & Witwit, 2017). Some examples of power dynamics in the family are: (1) parent‒child relationships, where parents hold authority over children; (2) extended family influence, where in-laws or grandparents may exert power through opinions. These dynamics display through both explicit power structures and subtle relational patterns, influencing decision-making and determining which voices have priority within the family (Omorogiuwa, 2021).

And then I remember the one aunt saying to me come to the bedroom… And then she sat me down and she said usually as a woman you get, sort of told what needs to happen. And then you agree, and it's the men that sort of dictate what needs to happen. (S6)

You can't say that, you can't say the older person is stubborn. You can't. You can't. You can't. … You have to look at your age group and going down. (CF-P1)

In South Africa, power dynamics are influenced by cultural norms, generational hierarchies, and socioeconomic circumstances, among other factors. An example of these factors would be the traditional gender roles, where men hold authority on decision-making in the household. In some families an individual with money is regarded as having more authority than those without money in family events. Traditional family structures frequently place emphasis on elder authority and gender roles, whereas urbanization and new cultural norms contribute to shifting power dynamics (Makiwane et al., 2017).

And so I want to spice things up and I want to do vegetables and roasted chickens and stuff. … let's try new things and to them it was as if I was saying their food or their culture isn't sort of up to my standard and to me it wasn't about that. It was about you guys eat ‘uphuthu’ the whole year. Let's explore other things. Let's learn new ways of cooking. (S6)

Furthermore, economic strains and single-parent households can transfer authority, frequently placing children or extended family members in key positions (Makiwane et al., 2017). Family Systems Theory (Bowen, 1978) frames power dynamics as integral to the family's functioning, where power imbalances can disrupt emotional boundaries and create conflict. Conversely, balanced power dynamics often foster mutual respect, collaboration, and effective conflict resolution (Andress et al., 2020).

Theme 4: Family Activities and Bonding

Family activities refer to structured or unstructured interactions that family members engage in together such as sharing a meal, watching a program on TV, or going to church together. These activities can serve various functions such as bonding, education, recreation, and the development of family identity. Family activities include a variety of interactions that help members bond, learn, and feel emotionally connected to one another (Melvin et al., 2020). These can be many different things, such as daily family activities or leisure and recreational activities. Recreational pursuits like sports, games, and outdoor excursions give families the chance to bond through shared experiences and deepen their emotional bonds (Izenstark & Ebata, 2016, 2022). Similarly, daily activities like eating meals together or doing chores around the house together offer unstructured but significant opportunities for communication and role modelling. As demonstrated below:

What is so very important for maybe emotion or for relationship within a family is to have meals together…I think the sitting around the table as a family and where, you know, where they all can talk. (WF-P1)

We started a new thing of having suppers together every day… to catch up on everybody's day. (BF-P2)

Families alluded to the need for and importance of spending time together connecting as a family. For adult participants, this is done over a meal together. Whereas for younger participants it is done through playing together.

Playing as a family. (ZF 2-P3)

Family activities can be significantly influenced by cultural and religious customs (Fathallah et al., 2020). Taking part in long-standing family customs, holiday celebrations, or religious services all serve as manifestations of the family's cultural identity and values while also acting as opportunities for bonding.

Yes, when we go to the church service we go together. (ZF3-P2)

From the systems perspective, these regular interactions create predictable, positive patterns that enhance emotional connections among family members, furthering the family's resilience. By participating in collective activities, each family member reinforces their place within the family system, creating a supportive and communicative structure that fosters individual well-being and shared identity.

In addition to these, educational activities such as assisting children with schoolwork or visiting places of interest such as the zoo or the theater are a necessary part of family life since they promote learning while also building familial support and teamwork. It also promotes intergenerational communication.

Theme 5: Families and Technology

In today's quickly changing digital landscape, technological adaptability has become an essential component of intergenerational communication. Different generations often show a variety of technology proficiency and familiarity with digital tools (Wang & Wu, 2022). Younger generations, who often identify as digital natives, can play an important role in assisting elderly people with modern technology (Nakagawa & Yellowlees, 2020). At the same time, older generations may provide context and critical thinking abilities, encouraging more thoughtful and efficient use of technology by younger people. This form of interaction has the potential to build generational relationships while also reducing the digital gap.

I mean, they've got cell phones, they got tablets now. We never used to have it…. (CF-P1)

Like, which is why I am putting it out there, radios and TVs because if you look at the times we live in now, they are all glued on something. (ZF1-P2)

Although this form of interaction can reduce the digital gap, it has the potential to cause misunderstandings and disagreements. These could lead to conflicts. Conflict resolution is a key component in intergenerational communication (Leiß & Zehrer, 2018). Misunderstandings and disagreements may emerge as a result of generational disparities in communication methods, expectations, and values. Effective intergenerational communication involves establishing healthy problem-solving alternatives. This could entail attentive listening, respect for opposing ideas, and finding common ground. Successfully negotiating these hurdles can help to enhance intergenerational relationships, resulting in more peaceful and cohesive families.

Discussion

This study employed Family Systems Theory to explore family dynamics in urban South African contexts, emphasizing the complex interplay between traditional cultural norms and modern social pressures. The findings demonstrate how family structures change throughout time, influenced by cultural norms, social conditions, and technological developments. Families operate as interlinked emotional units, with changes in one aspect affecting the entire system (Becvar et al., 2023), necessitating ongoing adaptation to new circumstances. While traditional values continue to have an effect, families are adapting their responsibilities, communication patterns, and sources of support in response to urbanization, economic constraints, and new societal standards.

The variety of family structures highlighted in this study reflects South Africa's ongoing social development, which is consistent with Chambers and Gracia's (2021) conclusion that family structures around the world are becoming more diversified. The prevalence of extended families providing intergenerational support is consistent with Maqubela's (2016) observation that, despite urbanization pressures, many South African families retain collective caring arrangements based on traditional cultural values. However, the growing proportion of single-parent homes indicates a significant shift in family structure, resulting in new challenges such as financial burdens of the household, time constraints, and other social stigmas. These lead to different adaptation methods within these systems like alternative support network such as formation of the chosen family of friends and neighbors for support and assistance when needed. This fluidity of family structures, challenging static definitions of what constitutes a family unit, aligns with contemporary family theories emphasizing that family is best understood through its function rather than its form (Dermott & Fowler, 2020).

Traditional power structures continue to have effect on South African households, as seen by hierarchical communication patterns. This hierarchy influences emotional expression and information flow, resulting in what Bowen referred to as emotional triangles in which anxiety and tension are controlled by regular patterns of interaction (Murdock et al., 2023). The observed hierarchical communication patterns are consistent with Bowen's idea of emotional triangles, in which family tensions are addressed via predictable three-person relationship networks (Papero, 2024). In traditional South African households, these triangles frequently include elders who act as mediators between parents and children, calming anxiety while occasionally maintaining hierarchical power dynamics. Furthermore, as families adjust to urban environments, triangulation patterns shift, with non-family individuals such as friends increasingly drawn into emotional systems to resolve tensions that were formerly kept inside extended family networks (Hall & Posel, 2019). These characteristics are more evident in families managing intergenerational boundaries, where authority is associated with age and gender. According to Makiwane et al. (2017), even as South African families adapt to current socioeconomic circumstances, many maintain traditional norms that emphasize respect for elders and clearly defined roles.

Traditional gender-specific expectations of parenting persist; however, there is evidence of more flexibility in parental roles. Fathers, who were traditionally viewed solely as financial providers, are now taking on more emotionally invested roles, reflecting broader societal changes in masculinity and caregiving (Gaspar et al., 2022). On the other hand, mothers in single-parent households frequently take on various roles while managing economic and emotional responsibilities (Hall & Mokomane, 2018). Despite these changes, intergenerational expectations continue to influence parenting practices, with older family members frequently supporting hierarchical family roles while sometimes hindering free communication between parents and children (Prime et al., 2020). However, urbanization and changing gender roles have begun to challenge these traditional power structures. For instance, younger family members are increasingly advocating for greater autonomy and open communication.

The findings denote that power in South African families is increasingly being negotiated rather than assigned based on traditional markers. This movement is consistent with global trends toward more democratic family functioning (Jurczyk et al., 2019), yet it also retains particular cultural characteristics that reflect South Africa's unique historical and social environment.

Ganong and Coleman (2016) postulated that parental duties are becoming more fluid, encompassing technological mediation, emotional coaching, and adapting to changing gender norms. The observation that parents frequently unintentionally model behaviors that their children internalize provides support to Lindblom's (2017) claim that family systems serve as major socialization contexts in which values and communication styles are passed down through generations. According to Sooryamoorthy and Makhoba (2016), South African families frequently display adaptability, combining components of both traditional and contemporary family organizing principles to produce systems that address current challenges while conserving cultural identity. The emphasis placed on establishing boundaries while maintaining supportive relationships in this study, illustrates what Olson et al. (2019) describe as balanced family functioning, where cohesion and flexibility exist in productive tension.

Family activities emerge as an important tool for increasing emotional intimacy and strengthening familial bonds. The emphasis on shared meals and religious activities as main bonding experiences is consistent with earlier studies showing that habitual family rituals promote cohesion and intergenerational connection (Melvin et al., 2020). Furthermore, these findings highlight the systemic element of family connections, with recurring activities acting as stabilizing influences within the family unit (Izenstark & Ebata, 2022). However, economic restrictions may limit the frequency and quality of recreational family activities, emphasizing socioeconomic gaps in bonding and shared experiences (Karney, 2021).

The growing use of technology in family interactions creates both opportunities and disadvantages. While technology makes communication easier, especially between geographically dispersed family members, it also creates new difficulties, especially among children and adolescents over screen time and digital participation (Wang & Wu, 2022). These findings are consistent with previous studies on the impact of digital media on family ties, which found that technology can either strengthen or weaken emotional connections depending on usage patterns and generational views (Barrie et al., 2019; Nakagawa & Yellowlees, 2020).

The differentiation of self is especially visible in how South African families negotiate technological adoption and digital communication (Livingstone & Blum-Ross, 2020; Meyers & Rugunanan, 2020). Older family members frequently set greater barriers against digital invasion, preferring traditional face-to-face contacts as their primary way of connection, indicating a stronger distinction between family time and external factors. While younger family members, on the other hand, demonstrate a greater integration of the digital and real worlds, smoothly integrating technology into family ties. This generational variation in technology integration reflects various levels of emotional reactivity to systemic change, as outlined by Bowen (Duriez, 2021). Families with more differentiation show the ability to adjust to technological advances while keeping basic relationship values, setting intentional boundaries around technology use rather than rejecting it completely or allowing it to dominate family interactions (Minuchin, 2018).

For South African families, this divide may be particularly pronounced due to disparities in access to technology across socioeconomic groups and generations. Addressing these generational gaps necessitates a balanced approach that uses digital tools to promote positive family engagement while minimizing their alienating effects (Leiß & Zehrer, 2018).

Limitations

While this study provides valuable insights into the dynamics of urban South African families, several limitations should be noted. The study involved only seven families (three Zulu-speaking and four English-speaking) across different racial groups in South Africa. The total participants were 30 family members and nine stakeholders, which is a relatively small sample that may limit generalizability. The sample was primarily drawn from northeastern Johannesburg, limiting generalizability to other urban and rural contexts. Additionally, while the sample included diverse family structures and cultural backgrounds, it cannot capture the full range of South African family experiences. Qualitative research methodology means findings are exploratory and interpretive rather than statistically generalizable. Reliance on focus group interviews and semi-structured interviews could introduce potential interviewer bias. The study's cultural and linguistic context is specific to South African families, which might limit direct transferability to other cultural contexts.

Implications and Recommendations

These findings help to build a more sophisticated understanding of Family Systems Theory in non-Western settings. According to Chambers and Gracia (2021), family systems frameworks must be culturally responsive, recognizing that ideas like boundaries, hierarchy, and communication can emerge differently across cultural contexts. The current study supports this viewpoint by revealing that South African families operate within systems that incorporate both universal principles of family functioning and culturally specific modifications.

These findings emphasize the necessity of interventions that respect cultural variation while acknowledging the universal value of strong family ties. According to Theron (2016), effective treatments must recognize the qualities inherent in cultural family systems while supporting families in adapting to contemporary challenges. This may include assisting families in identifying and strengthening current communication patterns, learning new skills for handling technological change, and negotiating power relations in ways that respect cultural values while supporting healthy functioning. Community-based initiatives that recognize the importance of extended kin networks may give significant assistance, particularly to single-parent and economically challenged homes.

Future research could expand to include more geographic diversity and specifically examine how family dynamics manifest in rural areas, where traditional structures may be more pronounced. Additionally, longitudinal studies would enhance understanding of how family dynamics evolve over time, particularly as children mature and family structures change. Research examining specific transitions, such as migration from rural to urban areas or the integration of new family members, would further illuminate the adaptive processes of South African family systems.

Conclusion

This study sheds light on the complex dynamics of urban South African households as they navigate the intersection of traditional cultural values and contemporary social demands. The study identified five themes to unpack the dynamics. These were the following: (1) the structure and makeup of families; (2) parental roles, this theme had one subtheme, namely: parental support; (3) power dynamics in the family; (4) family activities and bonding; and (5) families and technology. The Family Systems Theory was employed to explore and understand the family as a system with varied dynamics.

The findings reveal that South African families demonstrate remarkable resilience, balancing the preservation of cultural traditions with the need to adjust to rapid societal shifts, economic pressures, and technological advancements.

As South Africa continues its process of social transformation, a deeper understanding of the systemic nature of family functioning becomes essential for shaping effective support strategies. Viewing families as interdependent emotional units within distinct cultural contexts enables practitioners and policymakers to develop more nuanced, culturally sensitive approaches to family well-being. These approaches should acknowledge both the universal aspects of family systems and the unique ways South African families interpret and apply these principles within their historical, cultural, and social landscapes.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors disclose receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by the National Research Foundation (grant numbers: 118551, 118581, and 115460).

ORCID iDs

Lynette M. Sikhakhane

Nicolette V. Roman

References

Adler

Salantera

Zumstein-Shaha

(2019). Focus group interviews in child, youth, and parent research: An integrative literature review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919887274

Allen

B. J.

(2023). Difference matters: Communicating social identity. Waveland Press.

Ambert

A. M.

(2020). Parents, children, and adolescents: Interactive relationships and development in context. Routledge.

Andress

Hall

Davis

Levine

Cripps

Guinn

(2020). Addressing power dynamics in community-engaged research partnerships. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 4(24), 1–8.

Ani

N. C.

(2024). The impact of family dynamics on children’s mental health: Systematic review. Nigerian Journal Of Arts And Humanities (NJAH), 4(2), 87–97.

Barger

M. M.

Kim

E. M.

Kuncel

N. R.

Pomerantz

E. M.

(2019). The relation between parents’ involvement in children’s schooling and children’s adjustment: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 145(9), 855. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000201

Barrett

L. F.

Adolphs

Marsella

Martinez

A. M.

Pollak

S. D.

(2019). Emotional expressions reconsidered: Challenges to inferring emotion from human facial movements. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 20(1), 1–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100619832930

Barrie

C. K.

Bartkowski

J. P.

Haverda

(2019). The digital divide among parents and their emerging adult children: Intergenerational accounts of technologically assisted family communication. Social Sciences, 8(3), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8030083

Becvar

R. J.

Becvar

D. S.

Reif

L. V.

(2023). Systems theory and family therapy: A primer. Rowman & Littlefield.

10.

Bihari

(2023). Cultural heritage and indigenous knowledge: Reviving traditions for future generations. In Sustainable development goals in SAARC countries: Key issues, opportunities and challenges (Vol. 1, pp. 24–32). Jyotikiran Publication, Pune.

11.

Bowen

(1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. Jason Aronson.

12.

Bubic

Tošic

Mišetic

(2021). The role of parental self-efficacy in explaining children's academic outcomes. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(4), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.860

13.

Chambers

Gracia

(2021). A sociology of family life: Change and diversity in intimate relations. John Wiley & Sons.

14.

Chua

R. Y.

Kadirvelu

Yasin

Choudhry

F. R.

Park

M. S. A.

(2019). The cultural, family and community factors for resilience in Southeast Asian indigenous communities: A systematic review. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(7), 1750–1771. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22224

15.

Clarke

Braun

(2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

16.

Creswell

J. W.

(2017). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed). SAGE.

17.

Dermott

Fowler

(2020). What is a family and why does it matter? Social Sciences, 9(5), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9050083

18.

Duriez

(2021). Emotion regulation focused family therapy with contemporary families affected by information and communication technologies. Frontiers in Sociology, 6, 633515. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.633515

19.

Fathallah

Sidani

Khalil

(2020). How religion shapes family business ethical behaviors: An institutional logics perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 163(4), 647–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04383-6

20.

Fingerman

K. L.

Huo

Birditt

K. S.

(2020). Mothers, fathers, daughters, and sons: Gender differences in adults’ intergenerational ties. Journal of Family Issues, 42(5), 939–963. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x19894369

21.

Ganong

Coleman

(2016). Effects of stepfamily living on children. In Stepfamily relationships (pp. 175–189). Springer.

22.

Gaspar

Cerqueira

Guedes

F. B.

de Matos

M. G.

(2022). Parental emotional support, family functioning and children's quality of life. Psychological Studies, 67(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-022-00652-z

23.

Goodall

Montgomery

(2023). Parental involvement to parental engagement: A continuum. In Martin

Bowl

Banks

(Eds.), Mapping the field (pp. 158–169). Routledge.

24.

Grover

V. K.

(2015). Research approach: An overview. Golden Research Thoughts, 4(8), February 2015.

25.

Hall

Mokomane

(2018). The shape of children’s families and households: A demographic overview. In Hall

Richter

Makomane

Lake

(Eds.), Children, families and the state (pp. 32–45). Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town.

26.

Hall

Posel

(2019). Fragmenting the family? The complexity of household migration strategies in post-apartheid South Africa. IZA Journal of Development and Migration, 10(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2478/izajodm-2019-0004

27.

Handel

(2018). The psychosocial interior of the family. Routledge.

28.

Haq

S. N.

(2024). The effects of urbanization on traditional family structures. Journal of Social Signs Review, 2(3), 70–79. https://socialsignsreivew.com/index.php/12/index

29.

Izenstark

Ebata

A. T.

(2016). Theorizing family-based nature activities and family functioning: The integration of attention restoration theory with a family routines and rituals perspective. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12138

30.

Izenstark

Ebata

A. T.

(2022). Why families go outside: An exploration of mothers’ and daughters’ family-based nature activities. Leisure Sciences, 44(5), 559–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2019.1625293

31.

Johnson

B. E.

Ray

W. A.

(2016). Family systems theory. In Shehan

C. L.

(Ed.), The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of family studies (pp. 1–5). John Wiley & Sons.

32.

Jurczyk

Jentsch

Sailer

Schier

(2019). Female-breadwinner families in Germany: New gender roles? Journal of Family Issues, 40(13), 1731–1754. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x19843149

33.

Karney

B. R.

(2021). Socioeconomic status and intimate relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-051920-013658

34.

Keller

M. N.

Noone

R. J.

(Eds.). (2019). Handbook of Bowen family systems theory and research methods: A systems model for family research. Routledge.

35.

Leiß

Zehrer

(2018). Intergenerational communication in family firm succession. Journal of Family Business Management, 8(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-09-2017-0025

36.

Lindblom

J. A. L. L. U.

(2017). Significance of early family environment on children’s affect regulation [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tempere]. Trepo Etusivu. https://trepo.tuni.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/101411/978-952-03-0457-7.pdf?sequence=4

37.

Livingstone

S. M.

Blum-Ross

(2020). Parenting for a digital future: How hopes and fears about technology shape children's lives. Oxford University Press.

38.

Makiwane

Gumede

N. A.

Makoae

Vawda

(2017). Family in a changing South Africa: Structures, functions and the welfare of members. South African Review of Sociology, 48(2), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2017.1288166

39.

Maqubela

L. N.

(2016). Changing motherhood and the shifting social networks-of-care within black families in the post-apartheid South Africa. Gender and Behaviour, 14(2), 7225–7234. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-59f590ddc

40.

Masten

A. S.

Palmer

A. R.

(2019). Parenting to promote resilience in children. In Bornstein

M. H.

(Ed.), Handbook of parenting (pp. 156–188). Routledge.

41.

Melvin

Winklhofer

McCabe

(2020). Creating joint experiences-families engaging with a heritage site. Tourism Management, 78, 104038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104038

42.

Meyers

Rugunanan

(2020). Mobile-mediated mothering from a distance: A case study of Somali mothers in Port Elizabeth, South Africa. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(5), 656–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877920926645

43.

Minuchin

(2018). Families and family therapy. Routledge.

44.

Mohapanele

K. G.

(2023). The impact of family structure and its dynamics on street children phenomenon in the North West province of South Africa [Doctoral dissertation]. North-West University (South Africa).

45.

Momeni

Pincus

Libien

(2018). Cross tabulation and categorical data analysis. In Introduction to statistical methods in pathology (pp. 93–120). Springer.

46.

Murdock

N. L.

Flynn

M. C.

Bresin

R. C.

(2023). Differentiation of self, anxiety, triangling and distress: A test of Bowen theory. Family Process, 62(4), 1671–1686. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12845

47.

Nakagawa

Yellowlees

(2020). Inter-generational effects of technology: Why millennial physicians may be less at risk for burnout than baby boomers. Current Psychiatry Reports, 22(45), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-020-01171-2

48.

Nelsen

Erwin

Duffy

R. A.

(2019). Positive discipline for preschoolers, revised 4th edition: For their early years–raising children who are responsible, respectful, and resourceful. Harmony.

49.

Olson

D. H.

Waldvogel

Schlieff

(2019). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: An update. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 11(2), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12331

50.

Omorogiuwa

(2021). Power dynamics in parent-child relationships: A child labour dilemma. Social Work and Education, 8(3), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.21.3.6

51.

Osher

Cantor

Berg

Steyer

Rose

(2021). Drivers of human development: How relationships and context shape learning and development 1. In Cantor

Osher

(Eds.), The science of learning and development (pp. 55–104). Routledge.

52.

Papero

D. V.

(2024). The family emotional system. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 45(2), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/anzf.1585

53.

Peck

Mummery

(2018). Hermeneutic constructivism: An ontology for qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317706931

54.

Picatoste

Pérez-Ortiz

Ruesga-Benito

S. M.

(2018). A new educational pattern in response to new technologies and sustainable development. Enlightening ICT skills for youth employability in the European Union. Telematics and Informatics, 35(4), 1031–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.014

55.

Prime

Wade

Browne

D. T.

(2020). Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist, 75(5), 631. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000660

56.

Recchia

H. E.

Witwit

M. A.

(2017). Family perspectives on siblings’ conflict goals in middle childhood: Links to hierarchical and affective features of sibling relationships. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2017(156), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20198

57.

Roksa

Kinsley

(2019). The role of family support in facilitating academic success of low-income students. Research in Higher Education, 60(4), 415–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-018-9517-z

58.

Segrin

Flora

(2018). Family communication. Routledge.

59.

Siegel

D. J.

(2020). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are. Guilford Publications.

60.

Sooryamoorthy

Makhoba

(2016). The family in modern South Africa: Insights from recent research. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 47(3), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.47.3.309

61.

Swaraj

(2019). Exploratory research: Purpose and process. Parisheelan, xv(2), 78.

62.

Syakhrani

A. W.

Aslan

(2024). The impact of informal family education on children's social and emotional skills. Indonesian Journal of Education (INJOE), 4(2), 619–631. https://www.injoe.org/index.php/INJOE/article/view/153

63.

Thebe

Maviza

(2019). The effects of feminization of migration on family functions in Tsholotsho district, Zimbabwe. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(5), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.65.6462

64.

Theron

L. C.

(2016). Toward a culturally and contextually sensitive understanding of resilience: Privileging the voices of black, South African young people. Journal of Adolescent Research, 31(6), 635–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558415600072

65.

Umberson

Thomeer

M. B.

(2020). Family matters: Research on family ties and health, 2010 to 2020. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 404–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12640

66.

Volti

Croissant

(2024). Society and technological change. Waveland Press.

67.

Wang

C. H.

C. L.

(2022). Bridging the digital divide: The smart TV as a platform for digital literacy among the elderly. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(12), 2546–2559. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2021.1934732

Family Dynamics in a Sample South African Family: A Systems Theory Analysis of Cultural Adaptation and Contemporary Challenges

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Methodology

Participants

Data Collection

Data Analysis

Results

Theme 1: The Structure and Makeup of Families

Theme 2: Parental Roles

Subtheme 1: Parental Support

Theme 3: Power Dynamics in the Family

Theme 4: Family Activities and Bonding

Theme 5: Families and Technology

Discussion

Limitations

Implications and Recommendations

Conclusion

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

References