This study was conducted to predict the quality of marital relationships based on communication beliefs, attachment styles, and initial maladaptive schemas in married women. The statistical population of this study included all married women who sought counseling at family counseling centers and health clinics in our studied area. Using Green's formula (
1991), a sample of 250 individuals was selected through convenience sampling. To collect data, questionnaires on marital quality by Busby, attachment styles by Hazan and Shaver, communication beliefs by Eidelson and Epstein, and initial maladaptive schemas by Young were used. Pearson correlation and simultaneous regression analysis were employed for data analysis. The results indicated that the quality of marital relationships can be predicted based on communication beliefs, attachment styles, and initial maladaptive schemas. Specifically, there was an indirect relationship between early maladaptive schemas, avoidant attachment style, anxious attachment style, and marital quality. Additionally, a direct relationship was observed between secure attachment style and marital quality. Improving marital relationship quality requires attention to attachment styles, communication beliefs, and maladaptive schemas, and family practitioners should pay special attention to these factors.
AlimoradiZ.ZarabadipourS.ArratoN. A.GriffithsM. D.AndersenB. L.BahramiN. (2022). The relationship between cognitive schemas activated in sexual context and early maladaptive schemas among married women of childbearing age. BMC Psychology, 10(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00829-1
2.
BachB.LockwoodG.YoungJ. E. (2018). A new look at the schema therapy model: Organization and role of early maladaptive schemas. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 47(4), 328–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2017.1410566
BusbyD. M.ChristensenC.CraneD. R.LarsonJ. H. (1995). A revision of the dyadic adjustment scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21(3), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00163.x
5.
CassidyT. (2018). Diet, exercise and motivation in weight reduction: The role of psychological capital and stress. JOJ Nursing & Health Care, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.19080/jojnhc.2018.09.555775
6.
ChagnonN. A. (2019). Kin-Selection theory, kinship, marriage and fitness among the ya¸nomamö Indians. In Sociobiology: Beyond nature/nurture? (pp. 545–571). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429306587-21
7.
DegiuliP.AndreisL.VučenovićD. (2023). The relationship between jealousy and Mate retention strategies in romantic relationships among women during the COVID-19 pandemic. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(12), 2877–2890. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13120199
8.
DewiE. M.PuspitawatiH.KrisnatutiD. (2019). The effect of social capital and husband-wife interaction on marital quality among familiesin early years and middle years marriage. Journal of Family Sciences, 3(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.29244/jfs.3.1.30-40
9.
DostM. T.ArasS. (2021). Close relationship belief and self-change as predictors of romantic relationship quality in university students. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 11(1), 135–162. https://doi.org/10.14527/PEGEGOG.2021.004
10.
DumitrescuD.RusuA. S. (2012). Relationship between early maladaptive schemas, couple satisfaction and individual mate value: An evolutionary psychological approach. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies, 12(1), 63–76.
11.
EidelsonR. J.EpsteinN. (1982). Cognition and relationship maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50(5), 715–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.50.5.715
12.
EpsteinN.EidelsonR. J. (1981). Unrealistic beliefs of clinical couples: Their relationship to expectations, goals and satisfaction. American Journal of Family Therapy, 9(4), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926188108250420
13.
GivertzM.WoszidloA.SegrinC.JiaQ. (2019). Direct and indirect effects of attachment orientation on relationship quality and constraint commitment in married couples. Journal of Family Studies, 25(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2016.1211548
14.
GottmanJ. M. (2013). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. Elsevier.
GrabowskiA. (2023). Early maladaptive schemas and the quality of marital bond and communication. Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio, 53(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.34766/fetr.v53i1.1160
17.
GreenS. B. (1991). How many subjects does it take to do A regression analysis?Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26(3), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7
18.
HazanC.ShaverP. (2017). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. In Interpersonal development (pp. 283–296). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351153683-17
JamesS.HunsleyJ.HemsworthD. (2002). Factor structure of the relationship belief inventory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(6), 729–744. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021285332295
21.
JanovskyT.RockA. J.ThorsteinssonE. B.ClarkG. I.MurrayC. V. (2020). The relationship between early maladaptive schemas and interpersonal problems: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 27(3), 408–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2439
22.
JohnsonS. M. (2019). The Practice of Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy: Creating Connection. In The Practice of Emotionally Focused Couple Therapy: Creating Connection, Third Edition (Third Edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351168366
23.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (2020). Research on marital satisfaction and stability in the 2010s: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12635
24.
KarpovY. V. (2003). Development through the lifespan: A Neo-Vygotskian approach. In Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840975.009
25.
KörükS. (2017). Early maladaptive schemas and attachment styles predicting tendencies in intimate relationship. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9), 393–411. https://zenodo.org/record/889032
26.
LavnerJ. A.KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (2016). Does Couples’ communication predict marital satisfaction, or does marital satisfaction predict communication?Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(3), 680–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12301
27.
LyddonW. J. (1992). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 6(2). Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange. https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.6.2.149
28.
MaroufizadehS.Omani-SamaniR.HosseiniM.Almasi-HashianiA.SepidarkishM.AminiP. (2020). The Persian version of the revised dyadic adjustment scale (RDAS): A validation study in infertile patients. BMC Psychology, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-0375-z
29.
MobeenT.DawoodS. (2023). Relationship beliefs, attachment styles and depression among infertile women. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X, 20(5), 100245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100245
30.
PlattR. A. L.NalboneD. P.CasanovaG. M.WetchlerJ. L. (2008). Parental conflict and infidelity as predictors of adult children’s attachment style and infidelity. American Journal of Family Therapy, 36(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926180701236258
31.
SandbergJ. G.BradfordA. B.BrownA. P. (2017). Differentiating between attachment styles and behaviors and their association with marital quality. Family Process, 56(2), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12186
32.
SanfordK. (2006). Communication during marital conflict: When couples alter their appraisal, they change their behavior. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(2), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.20.2.256
33.
SillimanB.GottmanJ. (1995). Why Marriages Succeed or Fail. In Family Relations (Vol. 44(1)). A&C Black. https://doi.org/10.2307/584750
34.
SpanierG. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.2307/350547
35.
ThimmJ. C. (2024). Predicting psychological need satisfaction and frustration from early maladaptive schemas and DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality traits. Current Psychology, 43(24), 21083–21095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05889-7
36.
UmemuraT.LacinováL.KotrčováK.FraleyR. C. (2018). Similarities and differences regarding changes in attachment preferences and attachment styles in relation to romantic relationship length: Longitudinal and concurrent analyses. Attachment and Human Development, 20(2), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2017.1383488
37.
van LankveldJ.JacobsN.ThewissenV.DewitteM.VerboonP. (2018). The associations of intimacy and sexuality in daily life: Temporal dynamics and gender effects within romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(4), 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517743076
38.
VollmannM.SprangS.van den BrinkF. (2019). Adult attachment and relationship satisfaction: The mediating role of gratitude toward the partner. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11–12), 3875–3886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519841712
39.
WelburnK.CoristineM.DaggP.PontefractA.JordanS. (2002). The schema questionnaire - short form: Factor analysis and relationship between schemas and symptoms. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(4), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016231902020
40.
WhittingtonD. D.TurnerL. A. (2024). Relations of family-of-origin communication patterns to attachment and satisfaction in emerging Adults’ romantic relationships. American Journal of Family Therapy, 52(3), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2022.2110173
41.
WrightA. L. (2020). Attachment identity as a predictor of relationship functioning among heterosexual and sexual-minority women. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 16(4), 434–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2019.1633452
42.
YahyaF.YusoffA.TalibA. T.Darshan SinghS. S.MohadA. H.Mohd IsaN. A.Ahmad KhiriM. J. (2021). Attachment styles and marital quality between spouses. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 7(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.2876.2021
43.
YalcinB. M.KarahanT. F. (2007). Effects of a couple communication program on marital adjustment. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 20(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2007.01.060053
YoungJ. E.BrownG. (1994). Young schema questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy for Personality Disorders: A Schema-Focused Approach, 2(2), 63–76.
46.
YoungJ. E.McGinnL.SalkovskisP. (1996). Schema-focused therapy. In Springer series on comparative treatments for psychological disorders (p. 291). Professional Resource Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
