The Expanding Definitions and Impact of Domestic and Family Violence on Family Dynamics and Legal Frameworks

Abstract

This article explores the evolving definitions of domestic and family violence and their implications on family dynamics, legal frameworks, and cultural contexts. Traditionally seen as physical violence, domestic and family violence now encompasses emotional, financial, and psychological abuse, a broader definition supported by organizations such as the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and the United Nations. This broadened scope, while intended to protect vulnerable individuals, has sparked debates on potential overreach, with critics warning of its effects on family autonomy and privacy. Through examining varied family models patriarchal, egalitarian, and modern, this article assesses how expanded legal interpretations intersect with family structure, emphasizing the need for tailored interventions sensitive to relationship dynamics and mutual conflict. Additionally, the article discusses how cultural heritage, and socioeconomic factors influence domestic violence perceptions and interventions, advocating for approaches that respect cultural diversity while promoting gender equality and reducing power imbalances. Subsequently, the article calls for balanced domestic violence frameworks that support family cohesion and resilience without undermining family harmony or autonomy.

Keywords

domestic and family violence definitions of family violence family structures domestic violence expanded definitions emotional abuse legal frameworks

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2022). Family, domestic and sexual violence in Australia: Continuing the national story. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/domestic-violence/family-domestic-sexual-violence-australia-2022/

Brilliantio. (2023). Balancing heritage with innovation. https://brilliantio.com/balancing-heritage-with-innovation/

Constructive Voices. (2023). Cultural resilience: Preserving heritage while embracing change. https://constructivevoices.org/cultural-resilience/

Eagly

A. H.

Karau

S. J.

(2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573

Hanna

(2009). Domestic violence and the law: Theory and practice. Foundation Press.

Heilman

M. E.

Haynes

M. C.

(2005). No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women's success in male-female teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 905–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.905

Holland

(1997). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. University of Chicago Press.

Ridgeway

(2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford University Press.

Shapiro

(2010). Psychotherapy of the borderline adult: A developmental approach. American Psychiatric Publishing.

10.

Suk

(2006). At home in the law: How the domestic violence revolution is transforming privacy. Yale University Press.

11.

Swan

S. C.

Snow

D. L.

(2006). The development of a theory of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1026–1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206293330

12.

United Nations General Assembly. (1993). Declaration on the elimination of violence against women (A/RES/48/104). United Nations. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/declaration-elimination-violence-against-women

13.

UN Women. (2020). Gender equality and women’s empowerment in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2020/04/policy-brief-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-women

14.

World Health Organization. (2018). Violence against women prevalence estimates. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women