The Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire (WFRQ; Walsh, 2016) attempted to operationalize family resilience in three domains: belief systems, organization patterns, and communication/problem-solving. However, neither the reliability nor validity of the questionnaire has been established. This study examined the WFRQ among 603 adults from a community-based sample with a focus on (1) descriptive statistics and (2) factor structure. Preliminary results suggest that most WFRQ items are suitable for measuring family resilience. Findings also suggested that there are two additional domains that may comprise family resilience. Recommendations for future evaluation and use of the WFRQ are provided.
BronfenbrennerU. (2009). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
2.
CurranP. J.WestS. G.FinchJ. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16
LittleR. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722
5.
RocchiS.GhidelliC.BurroR.VitaccaM.ScalviniS.Della VedovaA. M.BertolottiG. (2017). The Walsh Family Resilience Questionnaire: The Italian version. Neuropsychiatric Disease & Treatment, 13, 2987–2999. PMID: 29290684. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S147315
SixbeyM. T. (2005). Development of the family resilience assessment scale to identify family resilience constructs. University of Florida.
8.
WalshF. (2015). Strengthening family resilience (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
9.
WalshF. (2016). Applying a family resilience framework in training, practice, and research: Mastering the art of the possible. Family Process, 55(4), 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12260
