The current study evaluated the unique associations between three dimensions of emotional security in the family system (security, disengagement, and preoccupation) and problem drinking among romantically partnered males aged 18–30 years. The sample consisted of 49 males who were recruited with their partners as part of a broader study on substance behaviors. It was hypothesized that security in the family system (i.e., secure appraisals) would be negatively related to problematic drinking, whereas insecure appraisals (i.e., preoccupation and disengagement) would be positively related to problematic drinking. It was also hypothesized that living with a substance abuser during childhood would moderate family security–problem drinking associations. Regression analyses were used to test the hypotheses. Disengagement from the family system uniquely predicted higher levels of problematic drinking, accounting for participant age and partner drinking levels. Moderating results showed that the link between disengagement and drinking behaviors was significantly stronger among males who had lived in childhood with someone who abused substances compared to those who did not. The findings encourage consideration of family and romantic relationship contexts as future research and intervention targets for understanding problematic drinking behaviors in young adulthood.
BaborT. F.Higgins-BiddleJ. C.SaundersJ. B.MonteiroM. G. (2001). AUDIT—The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for use in primary care. World Health Organization.
2.
BucxF.Van WelF. (2008). Parental bond and life course transitions from adolescence to young adulthood. Adolescence, 43, 71–89.
3.
Cantón-CortésD.CantónJ.CortésM. R. (2016). Emotional security in the family system and psychological distress in female survivors of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 51, 54–63.
4.
ChassinL.PittsS. C.ProstJ. (2002). Binge drinking trajectories from adolescence to emerging adulthood in a high-risk sample: Predictors and substance abuse outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 67–78.
5.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
6.
CummingsE. M.KossK. J.DaviesP. T. (2015). Prospective relations between family conflict and adolescent maladjustment: Security in the family system as a mediating process. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43, 503–515.
7.
CummingsE. M.SchermerhornA. C.DaviesP. T.Goeke-MoreyM. C.CummingsJ. S. (2006). Interparental discord and child adjustment: Prospective investigations of emotional security as an explanatory mechanism. Child Development, 77, 132–152.
8.
DaviesP. T.CummingsE. M. (1994). Marital conflict and child adjustment: An emotional security hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 387–411.
9.
DaviesP. T.FormanE. M. (2002). Children’s patterns of preserving emotional security in the interparental subsystem. Child Development, 73, 1880–1903.
10.
FerraroK. F.SchaferM. H.WilkinsonL. R. (2016). Childhood disadvantage and health problems in middle and later life: Early imprints on physical health?American Sociological Review, 81, 107–133.
11.
FormanE. M.DaviesP. T. (2005). Assessing children’s appraisals of security in the family system: The development of the Security in the Family System (SIFS) scales. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 900–916.
12.
HardtJ.RutterM. (2004). Validity of adult retrospective reports of adverse childhood experiences: Review of the evidence. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 45, 260–273.
13.
HolwayG. V.UmbersonD.ThomeerM. B. (2017). Binge drinking and depression: The influence of romantic partners in young adulthood. Society and Mental Health, 7, 36–49.
14.
Jobe-ShieldsL.WilliamsJ.HardtM. (2017). Predictors of emotional security in survivors of interpersonal violence. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 2834–2842.
15.
JohnstonL. D.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.SchulenbergJ. E. (2004). Monitoring the future: National survey results on drug use, 1975–2003, Volume II, College students & adults ages 19–45. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/137797/vol2_2003.pdf?sequence=1.
16.
JohnstonL. D.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.SchulenbergJ. E.MiechR. A. (2015). Monitoring the future: National survey results on drug use, 1975–2014. Volume II: College students & adults ages 19–55. Institute for Social Research. http://monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/monographs/mtf-vol2_2014.pdf
17.
KokotailoP. K.EganJ.GangnonR.BrownD.MundtM.FlemingM. (2004). Validity of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test in college students. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 28, 914–920.
18.
MerlineA.JagerJ.SchulenbergJ. E. (2008). Adolescent risk factors for adult alcohol use and abuse: Stability and change of predictive value across early and middle adulthood. Addiction, 103, 84–99.
19.
MushquashA. R.StewartS. H.SherryS. B.MackinnonS. P.AntonyM. M.SherryD. L. (2013). Heavy episodic drinking among dating partners: A longitudinal actor–partner interdependence model. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27, 178–183.
20.
PatrickM. E.Evans-PolceR.KloskaD. D.MaggsJ. L.LanzaS. T. (2017). Age-related changes in associations between reasons for alcohol use and high-intensity drinking across young adulthood. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 78, 558–570.
21.
PatrickM. E.Terry-McElrathY. M. (2019). Prevalence of high intensity drinking from adolescence through young adulthood: National data from 2016–2017. Substance Abuse, 13, 1–5.
22.
PappL. M.BlumenstockS. (2016). Momentary affect and risk behavior correlates of prescription drug misuse among young adult dating couples: An experience sampling study. Addictive Behaviors, 53, 161–167.
23.
SchulenbergJ. E.JohnstonL. D.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.MiechR. A.PatrickM. E. (2018). Monitoring the future: National survey results on drug use, 1975–2017: Volume II, College students and adults ages 19–55. Institute for Social Research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED589764.pdf.
24.
ShoreyR. C.StuartG. L.CorneliusT. L. (2011). Dating violence and substance use in college students: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 541–550.
25.
StoneA. L.BeckerL. G.HuberA. M.CatalanoR. F. (2012). Review of risk and protective factors of substance use and problem use in emerging adulthood. Addictive Behaviors, 37, 747–775.
26.
StrineT. W.DubeS. R.EdwardsV. J.PrehnA. W.RasmussenS.WagenfeldM.DhingraS.CroftJ. B. (2012). Associations between adverse childhood experiences, psychological distress, and adult alcohol problems. American Journal of Health Behavior, 36, 408–423.
27.
Sturge-AppleM. L.DaviesP. T.WinterM. A.CummingsE. M.SchermerhornA. (2008). Interparental conflict and children’s school adjustment: The explanatory role of children’s internal representations of interparental and parent–child relationships. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1678–1690.
28.
SugarmanD. E.DeMartiniK. S.CareyK. B. (2009). Are women at greater risk? An examination of alcohol-related consequences and gender. The American Journal on Addictions, 18, 194–197.
29.
TaylorS. E.LernerJ. S.SageR. M.LehmanB. J.SeemanT. E. (2004). Early environment, emotions, responses to stress, and health. Journal of Personality, 72, 1365–1393.
30.
WeiM.VogelD. L.KuT. Y.ZakalikR. A. (2005). Adult attachment, affect regulation, negative mood, and interpersonal problems: The mediating roles of emotional reactivity and emotional cutoff. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 14–24.
31.
WhiteA. M.Jamieson-DrakeD. W.SwartzwelderH. S. (2002). Prevalence and correlates of alcohol-induced blackouts among college students: Results of an e-mail survey. Journal of American College Health, 51, 117–131.
32.
WiersmaJ. D.FischerJ. L.Harrington ClevelandH.ReifmanA.HarrisK. S. (2011). Selection and socialization of drinking among young adult dating, cohabiting, and married partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 182–200.
