It has been found that the presence of negative communicative techniques and emotional flooding in marital relationships negatively relates to marital satisfaction. However, current literature has not consistently included known demographical differences (e.g., race, gender, etc.) to truly test how these variables impact marital satisfaction. This study investigated the specific impact that both emotional flooding and negative communicative techniques had on 591 married individuals’ marital satisfaction while controlling for gender, race, and length of relationship. The results indicated that emotional flooding tends to decrease as marriages go on, and refusing to talk with the partner had the greatest negative impact on relationship satisfaction regardless of demographical differences. Suggestions are provided for how therapists and practitioners can use these findings to assist couples who are using negative communication techniques and are, subsequently, experiencing marital dissatisfaction.
BabcockJ. C.GottmanJ. M.RyanK. D.GottmanJ. S. (2013). A component analysis of a brief psycho educational couples’ workshop: One year follow up results. Journal of Family Therapy, 35, 252–280.
2.
BodenmannG.MeuwlyN.GermannJ.NussbeckF. W.HeinrichsM.BradburyT. N. (2015). Effects of stress on the social support provided by men and women in intimate relationships. Association of Psychological Science, 10, 1584–1594.
3.
Boyd-FranklinN. (2013). Black families in therapy: Understanding the African American experience. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
4.
BusbyD. M.CraneD. R.LarsonJ. H.ChristensenC. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construction hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21, 289–308.
5.
BusbyD. M.HolmanT. B. (2009). Perceived match or mismatch on the Gottman conflict styles: Associations with relationship outcome variables. Family Process, 48, 531–545.
6.
BusbyD. M.HolmanT. B.TaniguchiN. (2001). RELATE: Relationship evaluation of the individual, family, cultural, and couple contexts. Family Relations, 50, 308–316.
7.
FowlerC.DillowM. R. (2011). Attachment dimensions and the four horsemen of the apocalypse. Communication Research Reports, 28, 1.
8.
FrisbyB. N.Booth-ButterfieldM.DillowM. R.MartinM. M.WeberK. D. (2012). Face and resilience in divorce: The impact on emotions, stress, and post-divorce relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 715–735.
9.
GalinhaI. C.OishiS.PereiraC. R.WirtzD.EstevesF. (2014). Adult attachment, love styles, relationship experiences and subjective well-being: Cross-cultural and gender comparison between Americans, Portuguese, and Mozambicans. Social Indicators Research, 119, 823–852.
10.
GottmanJ. M. (1993). A theory of marital dissolution and stability. Journal of Family Psychology, 7, 57–75.
11.
GottmanJ. (1994). Why marriages succeed or fail. New York, NY: Fireside.
12.
GottmanJ. M.CoanJ.CarrereS.SwansonC. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 5–22.
13.
GottmanJ. M.DriverJ.TabaresA. (2015). Repair during marital conflict in newlyweds: How couples move from attack–defend to collaboration. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 26, 85–108.
14.
GubbinsC. A. (2010). Relationships between married couples’ self differentiation/individuation and Gottman’s model of marital interactions. Contemporary Family Therapy, 32, 383–395.
15.
HallJ. C. (2013). Resilience despite risk: Understanding African-American ACOAS’ kin and fictive kin relationships. In BecvarD. S. (Ed.), Handbook of family resilience (pp. 481–494). New York, NY: Springer.
16.
HolmanT. B.JarvisM. O. (2003). Hostile, volatile, avoiding, and validating couple-conflict types: An investigation of Gottman’s couple-conflict types. Personal Relationships, 10, 267–282.
17.
HongG. K.HamM. D. C. (2001). Psychotherapy and counseling with Asian American clients: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
HoranS. M.GuinnT. D.BanghartS. (2015). Understanding relationships among the dark triad personality profile and romantic partners’ conflict communication. Communication Quarterly, 63, 156–170.
19.
Moreno-MansoJ. M.Blázquez-AlonsoM.García-BaamondeM. E.Guerrero-BaronaE.Pozueco-RomeroJ. M. (2014). Gender as an explanatory factor of psychological abuse in dating couples. Journal of Social Service Research, 40, 1–14.
20.
MorlingB.FiskeS. T. (1999). Defining and measuring harmony control. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 379–414. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1999.2254.
21.
SchrodtP.WittP. L.ShimkowskiJ. R. (2014). A meta-analytical review of the demand/withdraw pattern of interaction and its associations with individual, relational, and communicative outcomes. Communication Monographs, 81, 28–58.
22.
ShapiroA. F.GottmanJ. M.FinkB. C. (2015). Short-term change in couples’ conflict following a transition to parenthood intervention. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 4, 239–251.
23.
SpanierG. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.
