Research related to the process of communication among couples is central to the work of couple and family therapists. This study examines the relationship between couple’s conflict resolution styles, weekly church attendance, and marital satisfaction. Specifically, we surveyed 191 Latino couples using Gottman’s typology of conflict resolution styles (e.g., validator, avoidant, and volatile) to identify which style predicted marital satisfaction for both partners. Using the actor–partner interdependence model, we find a multifaceted picture of how partner’s conflict resolution style influences theirs and their partner’s marital satisfaction.
AmatoP. R.JohnsonD. R.BoothA.RogersS. J. (2003). Continuity and change in marital quality between 1980 and 2000. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1–22.
2.
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the APA (6th ed.). Washington, DC: APA.
3.
ArbuckleJ. L. (2006). Amos(Version 7.0) [Computer Program]. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
4.
Baca ZinnM.WellsB. (2000). Diversity within Latino families: New lessons for family social science. In DemoD. H.AllenK. R.FineM. A. (Eds.), Handbook of family diversity (pp. 252–273). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
BarkiH.HartwickJ. (2004). Conceptualizing the construct of interpersonal conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15, 216–244.
6.
BermúdezJ. M.ReyesN. A.WamplerK. (2006). Conflict resolution styles among Latino couples. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, 5, 1–21. doi:10.1300/J398v05n0401
7.
BermúdezJ. M.StinsonM. A. (2011). Redefining conflict resolution styles for Latino couples: Examining the role of gender and culture. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 23, 71–87.
8.
BradburyT. N.FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. H. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964–980.
9.
BusbyD. M.HolmanT. B. (2009). Perceived match or mismatch on the Gottman conflict styles: Associations with relationship outcome variables. Family Process, 48, 531–545.
10.
ButlerM. H.StoutJ. A.GardnerB. C. (2002). Prayer as a conflict resolution ritual: Clinical implications of religious couples’ report of relationship softening, healing, perspective, and change responsibility. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 30, 19–37.
11.
CaiD. A.WilsonS. R.DrakeL. E. (2000). Culture in the context of intercultural negotiation: Individualism-collectivism and paths to integrative agreements. Human Communication Research, 26, 591–617.
12.
CallV. R.HeatonT. B. (1997). Religious influence on marital stability. Journal for Scientific Study of Religion, 36, 382–392.
13.
CanaryD. J. (2003). Managing interpersonal conflict: A model of events related to strategic choices. In GreeneJ. O.BurlesonB. R. (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 515–549). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
CherlinA. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.
15.
ChristensenA.HeaveyC. L. (1999). Interventions for couples. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 165–190.
16.
CookW. J.SnyderD. K. (2005). Analyzing nonindependent outcomes in couple therapy using the actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 133–141.
17.
CupachW. R.CanaryD. J. (1995). Managing conflict and anger: Investigating the sex stereotype hypothesis. In KalbfleischP. J.CodyM. J. (Eds.), Gender, power, and communication in human relationships (pp. 233–252). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
EllisonC. G.BurdetteA. M.WilcoxW. B. (2010). The couple that prays together: Race and ethnicity, religion, and relationship quality among working-age adults. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 963–975.
19.
FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. H. (2010). Of memes and marriage: Towards a positive relationship science. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 2, 4–24. doi:10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00033.x
20.
GoddardH. W.MarshallJ. P.OlsonJ. R.DennisS. A. (2012). Character strengths and religiosity as predictors of marital satisfaction in a sample of highly religious and divorce-prone couples. Journal of Couple and Relationship Therapy, 11, 2–15. doi:10.1080/15332691.2011.613308
21.
GottmanJ. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
GottmanJ. M. (1999). The marriage clinic: A scientifically based marital therapy. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
23.
GottmanJ. M.NotariusC. I. (2002). Marital research in the 20th century and a research agenda for the 21st century. Family Process, 41, 159–197.
24.
HoltJ.DeVoreC. J. (2005). Culture, gender, organizational role, and styles of conflict resolution: A meta-analysis. International Journal or Intercultural Relations, 29, 165–196. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.06.002
25.
HubbardA. S. E. (2001). Conflict between relationally uncertain romantic partners: The influence of relational responsiveness and empathy. Communication Monographs, 68, 400–414.
26.
HuenergardtD.Knudson-MartinC. (2009). Gender and power as a fulcrum for clinical change. In Knudson-MartinC.MahoneyA. (Eds.), Couples, gender, and power: Creating change in intimate relationships (pp. 337–360). New York, NY: Springer.
27.
JacksonJ. B.MillerR. B.OkaM.HenryR. G. (2014). Gender differences in marital satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 105–129.
28.
KennyD. A. (1996). The design and analysis of social-interaction research. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 59–86.
29.
KennyD. A.CookW. L. (1999). Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships, 6, 433–448.
30.
Kiecolt-GlaserJ. K.GouinJ. P.HantsooL. V. (2010). Close relationships, inflammation, and health. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 33–38.
31.
Knudson-MartinC.MahoneyA. (2005). Moving beyond gender: Processes that create relationship equality. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 235–246.
32.
Knudson-MartinC.MahoneyA. (2009). Gendered power in cultural contexts: Capturing the lived experience of couples. Family Process, 48, 5–8.
33.
NeumanW. L. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
34.
O’LearyK. D.CanoA. (2001). Marital discord and partner abuse: Correlates and causes of depression. In BeachS. R. H. (Ed.), Marital and family processes in depression (pp. 163–182). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35.
PruittD. G.KimS. H. (2004). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
36.
RegnerusM. D.ElderG. H.Jr (2003). Staying on track in school: Religious influences in high- and low-risk settings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 633–649.
37.
RounerD.SlaterM. D.Domenech-RodríguezM. (2003). Adolescent evaluation of gender-role and sexual imagery in television advertisements. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 47, 435–454.
38.
SeponskiD. M.BermudezJ. M.LewisD. C. (2013). Creating culturally responsive family therapy models and research: Introducing the use of responsive evaluation as a method. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 39, 28–42. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00282.x
39.
Ting-ToomeyS.Yee-JungK. K.ShapiroR. B.GarciaW.WrightT. J.OetzelJ. (2000). Ethnic/cultural identity salience and conflict styles in four US ethnic groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24, 47–81.
40.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
41.
WhismanM. A.BruceM. L. (1999). Marital dissatisfaction and incidence of major depressive episode in a community sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 674–678.
