The present qualitative study aimed to better understand common themes in the experiences of intercultural/multilingual couples through a phenomenological approach. Saturation was reached after interviewing eight couples (16 participants in total). Eight common themes related to cultural differences and four related to language differences were found to influence couples’ relationships and communication in this qualitative study. Affection expression, gender roles, religious preferences, importance of food, residency decisions, child-rearing practices, extended family, and handling of finances were all emerged themes of cultural negotiations. In terms of language, communicating with extended family, expressing self and communicating in second language, learning a different language, and lost in translation emerged as themes. Finally, implications for family and couples’ counselors are reviewed.
BystydzienskiJ. M. (2011). Intercultural couples: Crossing boundaries, negotiating difference. New York: New York University Press.
2.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
CrottyM. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
DeAngelisT. (2010, 2). Found in translation. Monitor on Psychology, 41, 52–55. Retrieved fromhttp://www.apa.org/monitor/
5.
FosterR. M. (1998). Language in the clinical process: Assessing and testing the bilingual person. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
6.
GottmanJ. M. (1999). The marriage clinic: A scientific-based marital therapy. New York: W. W. Norton.
7.
HaysD.ErfordB. T. (2010). Developing multicultural counseling competence: A systems approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
8.
HenriksenC.WattsR.BustamanteR. (2007). The Multiple Heritage Couple Questionnaire. The Family Journal, 15, 405–408. doi: 10.1177/1066480707304794
9.
HoM. K. (1990). Intermarried couples in therapy. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
10.
HsuJ. (2001). Marital therapy for intercultural couples. In TsengW.StreltzerJ. (Eds.), Culture and psychotherapy (pp. 225–242). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
11.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
Llerena-QuinnR.BacigalupeG. (2009). Constructions of difference among Latino/Latina immigrant and non-Hispanic white couples. In KarisT. A.KillianK. D. (Eds.), Intercultural couples: Exploring diversity in intimate relationships (pp. 21–30). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
MolinaB.EstradaD.BurnettJ. (2004). Cultural communities: Challenges and opportunities in the creation of “Happily Ever After” stories of intercultural couplehood. The Family Journal, 12, 139–147. doi:10.1177/1066480703261962
15.
MoustakasC. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
PolkinghorneD. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 137–145. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137
17.
PonterottoJ. G. (2010). Handbook of multicultural counseling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
RogersE. M.HartW. B. (2002). The histories of intercultural, international, and development communication. In GudykunstW. B.ModyB. (Eds.), Handbook of international and intercultural communication (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
RomanoD. (2008). Intercultural marriage: Promises and pitfalls. Boston, MA: Nicholas Brealey.
20.
RosenblattP. C. (2009). A systems theory analysis of intercultural couple relationships. In KarisT. A.KillianK. D. (Eds.), Intercultural couples: Exploring diversity in intimate relationships (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
SewardM. (2008). Identity negotiations and third culture building in intercultural marriages(Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3320302).
22.
ShinH.BrunoR. (2003). Language use and English-speaking ability: 2000 (No. C2KBR-29). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved fromhttp://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html
23.
Softas-NallB. C.BaldoT. (2000). Dialogues within a Greek family: Multicultural stories of a couple revisited. The Family Journal, 8, 396–398. doi:10.1177/1066480700084012
24.
Softas-NallL.CardonaB.BarrittJ. (2015). Challenges and diversity issues working with multilingual and bilingual couples and families: Implications for counseling. The Family Journal, 23, 13–17.
25.
SueD. W.ArredondoP.McDavisR. J. (1992). Multicultural competencies and standards: A call to the profession. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 477–486.
26.
SueD. W.SueD. (2012). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
27.
SullivanC.CottoneR. R. (2006). Culturally based couples therapy and intercultural relationships: A review of literature. The Family Journal, 14, 221–225. doi:10.1177/1066480706287278
28.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). The foreign-born population in the United States: 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
29.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2013). Language us in the United States: 2011 (ACS–22). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
