Couples, marriage, and family therapy (CMFT) educators and supervisors are required to differentiate between typical developmental struggles and more severe competency concerns. This process has the potential to become highly subjective and supervisors may differ in their perceptions of severity of trainee concerns, the need for intervention and/or remediation efforts, types of interventions utilized, and when to discontinue remediation efforts after interventions have failed to be effective. Ethical and competency standards, Council on Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) guidelines, and American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy (AAMFT) core competencies can be utilized in combination with a collaborative supportive approach to identify and encourage remediation of competency concerns for couples, marriage, and family therapists in training (CMFT-ITs). A composite case study is utilized to illustrate the unique demands of CMFT programs, promote early identification of ineffective trainee behaviors, consider ethical and legal mandates, and provide recommendations for intervention and remediation.
AjayiC.MarquezM. G.NazarioA. (2013). Culture and diversity: A lifelong journey. In RamboC.WestC.SchooleyA. L.BoydT. V. (Eds.), Family therapy review: Contrasting contemporary models (pp. 17–24). New York, NY: Routledge.
BaldoT. D.Softas-NallB. C.ShawS. F. (1997). Student review and retention in counselor education: An alternative to frame and Stevens-Smith. Counselor Education and Supervision, 35, 245–253.
4.
BlumeT. W. (2006). Organization: Planning, decision making, and action. In BlumeT.W. (Ed.), Becoming a family counselor: A bridge to family therapy (pp. 141–178). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
ElmanN. S.ForrestL. (2007). From trainee impairment to professional competence problems: Seeking new terminology that facilitates effective action. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 501–509.
7.
ElmanN.ForrestL.Vacha-HaaseT.GizaraS. (1999). A systems perspective on trainee impairment: Continuing the dialogue. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 712–721.doi:10.1177/0011000099275005.
8.
FrameM. W.Stevens-SmithP. (1995). Out of harm’s way: Enhancing monitoring and dismissal process in counselor education programs. Counselor Education and Supervision, 35, 118–129.
9.
GaubatzM. D.VeraE. M. (2002). Do formalized gatekeeping procedures increase programs’ follow up with deficient trainees. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 294–305.
10.
GaubatzM. D.VeraE. M. (2006). Trainee competence in master’s-level counseling programs: A comparison of counselor educators’ and students’ views. Counselor Education and Supervision, 46, 32–43.
11.
GizaraS. S.ForrestL. (2004). Supervisors’ experience of trainee impairment and incompetence at APA accredited internship sites. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 131–140.
12.
GunnJ. E.PistoleM. C. (2012). Trainee supervisor attachment: Explaining the alliance and disclosure in supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6, 229–237. doi:10.1037/a0030805
13.
HermanK. C. (1993). Reassessing predictors of therapist competence. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 29–32.
14.
IveyA. E. (1994). Intentional interviewing and counseling (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
15.
IveyA. E.NormingtonC. J.MillerC.MorrillW.HaaseR. (1968). Microcounseling and attending behavior: An approach to prepracticum counselor training. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 15, 1–12.
16.
KerlS. B.GarciaJ. L.McCulloughS.MaxwellM. E. (2002). Systematic evaluation of professional performance: Legally supported procedure and process. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 321–334. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2002.tb01294.x
17.
LambertM. J.OglesB. M. (1997). The effectiveness of psychotherapy supervision. In WatkinsC. E. (Ed.), The handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 421–446). New York, NY: Wiley.
18.
LeeR. E.NelsonT. S. (2014). The contemporary relational supervisor. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
LumadueC. A.DuffeyT. H. (1999). The role of graduate programs as gatekeepers: A model for evaluating student counselor competence. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39, 101–109.
20.
McAdamsC. R.FosterV. A. (2007). A guide to just and fair remediation of counseling students with professional performance deficiencies. Counselor Education and Supervision, 47, 2–13.
21.
ReiterM. D. (2014). Evolving conceptualizations. In ReiterM. D. (Ed.), Case conceptualization in family therapy (pp. 240–254). Boston, MA: Pearson.
22.
RussellC. S.DupreeW. J.BeggsM. A.PetersonC. M.AndersonM. P. (2007). Responding to remediation and gatekeeping challenges in supervision. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 227–244.
23.
RussellC. S.PetersonC. M. (2003). Student impairment and remediation in accredited marriage and family therapy programs. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29, 329–337. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01210
24.
Russell-ChapinL. A.ShermanN. E. (2000). The counselling interview rating form: A teaching and evaluation tool for counsellor education. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 28, 115–124. doi:10.1080/030698800109655
25.
SampsonJ. M.Kelly-TrombleyH. M.ZubatskyJ. M.HarrisS. M. (2013). Breaking up is hard to do: Dismissing students from MFT training programs. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 41, 26–33.
26.
Shen-MillerD. S.ForrestL.BurtM. (2012). Contextual influences on faculty diversity conceptualizations when working with trainee competence problems. The Counseling Psychologist, 40, 1181–1219. doi:10.1177/0011000011431832
27.
StormC. L. (2007). What is unique about supervising couple therapists? A beginning answer. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy,6, 219–230.
28.
TribbenseeN. E. (2003). Remediation and dismissal of trainees: Shifting the focus from impairment to performance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64, 1509.
29.
WilkersonK. (2006). Impaired students: Applying the therapeutic process model to graduate training programs. Counselor Education and Supervision, 45, 207–217.
