This article reviewed existing literature and research on the reflecting team process. There is a dearth of empirical research that explores the reflecting team process and the outcome of counseling that uses reflecting teams. Implications of using reflecting teams for counselors, counselor educators, and clients will be discussed. A call for further empirical research will also be explored.
AndersenT. (1987). The reflecting team: Dialogue and meta-dialogue in clinical work. Family Process, 26, 415–428.
2.
AndersenT. (1991). The reflecting team: Dialogues and dialogues about he dialogues. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
3.
AndersenT. (1995). Reflecting processes: Acts of informing and forming: You can borrow my eyes, but you must not take them away from me! In FriedmanS. (Ed.), The reflecting team in action (pp. 11–37). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
4.
ColeP. M.DemerittL. A.ShatzK.SapoznikM. (2001). Getting personal on reflecting teams. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 20, 74–87.
5.
CoxJ. A.BanezL.HawleyL. D. (2003). Use of the reflecting team process in the training of group workers. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 28, 89–105.
6.
FishelA. K.AblonS.McSheffreyC.BuchsT. (2005). What do couples find most helpful about the reflecting team?Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 4, 23–37.
7.
FrakeC.DograN. (2006). The use of reflecting teams in educational contexts. Reflective Practice, 7, 143–149.
8.
GriffithJ. L.GriffithM. E.KrejmasN.McLainM.MittalD.RainsJ.TingleC. (1992). Reflecting team consultation and their impact upon family therapy for somatic symptoms as coded by structural analysis of social behavior. Family Systems Medicine, 10, 53–58.
9.
HaleyJ. (1988). Reflections on supervision. In LiddleH.BreunlinD.SchwartzD. (Eds.), Family therapy training and supervision. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
HogerC.TommeM.ReiterL.SteinerE. (1994). The reflecting approach: Convergent results of two exploratory studies. Journal of Family Therapy, 16, 427–437.
11.
KleistD. M. (1999). Reflecting on the reflecting process: A research perspective. Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 7, 270–275.
12.
LandisL. L.YoungM. E. (1994). The reflecting team in counselor education. Counselor Education and Supervision, 33, 210–218.
13.
MaturanaH. R.VarelaF. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge. Boston, MA: New Science Library.
14.
MillsS. D.SprenkleD. H. (1995). Family therapy in the postmodern era. Family Relations, 44, 368–376.
15.
PenderR. L. (2008). Making meaning: A couple’s perspective of the reflecting team process(Unpublished master’s thesis). Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL.
16.
SellsS. P.SmithT. E.CoeM. J.YoshiokaM.RobbinsJ. (1994). An ethnography of couple and therapist experiences in reflecting team practice. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 20, 247–266.
17.
ShurtsW. M.CashwellC. S.SpurgeonS. L.Degges-WhiteS.BarrioC. A.KardatzkeK. N. (2006). Preparing counselors-in-training to work with couples: Using role-plays and reflecting teams. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 14, 151–157.
18.
SmithT. E.WintonM.YoshiokaM. (1992). A qualitative understanding of reflective teams II: Therapists’ perspectives. Contemporary Family Therapy, 14, 419–432.
19.
StinchfieldT. A.HillN. R.KleistD. M. (2007). The reflective model of triadic supervision: Defining an emerging modality. Counselor Education and Supervision, 46, 172–183.
