The considerable number of essential skills identified in the literature creates a challenge for family therapist instructors and supervisors who must develop a coherent curriculum for clinical training and supervision. This study used a modified Delphi method to obtain a consensus from experienced structural family therapists concerning the most essential skills needed by novice structural family therapists. The therapists concluded that relational skills are of primary importance to establish a therapeutic relationship that would facilitate the structural interventions. A critical component of the relational factor was the ability of the novice therapist to provide a vision of hope to clients and establish expectancy for change. The study provides an added dimension to understanding the essential training needs of novice structural family therapists from the practitioner’s perspective and brings research in essential skills for novice therapists closer to actual clinical practice. Implications for further research and clinical training are discussed.
Anderson, S. A. (1992). Evaluation of academic family therapy training program: Changes in trainees’relationship and intervention skills. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 18(4), 365-376.
2.
Avis, J. M., & Sprenkle, D. (1990). Outcome research on family therapy training: A substantive and methodological review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16(3), 241-264.
3.
Becvar, D. S., & Becvar, R. J. (2003). Family therapy: A systemic integration (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4.
Blow, A. J., & Sprenkle, D. H. (2001). Common factors across theories of marriage and family therapy: A modified Delphi study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27(3), 385-401.
5.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
Dalkey, N. C., Rourke, D. L., Lewis, R., & Snyder, D. (1972). Studies in the quality of life. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
7.
Figley, E. R., & Nelson, T. S. (1989). Basic family therapy skills, I: Conceptualization and initial findings. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15(4), 349-365.
8.
Figley, E. R., & Nelson, T. S. (1990). Basic family therapy skills, II: Structural family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16, 225-239.
9.
Fish, L. S. (1989). Comparing structural, strategic, and feminist-informed family therapies: Two Delphi studies. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 17(4), 303-314.
10.
Fish, L. S., & Busby, D. M. (1996). The Delphi method. In D. H. Sprenkle & S. Moon (Eds.), Research methods in family therapy (pp. 469-482). New York: Guilford.
11.
Fraenkel, P., & Pinsoff, W. M. (2001). Teaching family therapy-centered integration: Assimilation and beyond. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 11, 59-85.
12.
Greenberg, F., & Neimeyer, G. J. (1986). The impact of structuralfamily therapy training on conceptual and executive skills. Family Process, 2, 599-608.
13.
Hare-Mustin, R. T. (1998). Challenging traditional discourses in psychotherapy: Creating space for alternatives. Journalof Feminist Family Therapy, 10(3), 39-56.
14.
Hubble, M. A., Duncan, B. L., & Miller, S. D. (Eds.). (1999). The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15.
Kniskern, D. P., & Gurman, A. S. (1988). Research. In H. A. Liddle, D. C. Breunlin, & R. C. Schwartz (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy training and supervision (pp. 368-378). New York: Guilford.
16.
Lambert, M. J. (1992). Psychotherapy outcome research: Implications for integrative and eclectic therapists. In J. C. Norcorss & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 94-129). New York: Basic Books.
17.
Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., & Hubble, M. A. (1997). Escape from Babel: Toward a unifying language for psychotherapy practice. New York: Norton.
18.
Piercy, F. P., & Nickerson, V. (1996). Focus groups in family therapy research. In D. H. Sprenkle & S. M. Moon (Eds.), Research methods in family therapy (pp. 173-185). New York: Guilford.
19.
Robinson, T. L., & Howard-Hamilton, M. F. (2000). The convergence of race, ethnicity, and gender: Multiple identities in counseling. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20.
Scott, M. B., Edwards, S. A., & Russell, C. S. (1997). The essential elements of successful marriage and family therapy: A modified Delphi study. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 25, 212-231.
21.
Simon, G. M. (2004). An examinationof the integrative natureof emotionally focused therapy. The Family Journal, 12(3), 254-262.
22.
Sprenkle, D. H., & Bailey, C. E. (1997). Who’s publishing in JMFT? An examination of author characteristics. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 23, 381-387.
23.
Sprenkle, D. H., Blow, A. J., & Dickey, M. H. (1999). Common factors and other nontechnique variables in marriage and family therapy. In M. A. Hubble, B. L. Duncan, & S. D. Miller (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 329-360). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24.
Storm, C. L., Todd, T. C., Sprenkle, D. H., & Morgan, M. M. (2001). Gaps between marriage and family therapy supervision assumptions and common practice: Suggested best practices. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27(1), 227-239.
25.
Winkle, C. W., Piercy F. P., & Hovestadt, A. J. (1981). A curriculum for graduate-level marriage and family therapy education. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 7, 201-210.
