It is not uncommon to hear about a family’s experience with a family counselor who is impaired in some fashion such as being burned out, experiencing stress, or dealing with his or her own personal issues. However, it is unethical to continue to practice or to knowingly allow a family counselor to continue when the impairment ultimately negatively affects the clients. An issue that is at the core is accepting students into the counselor education program and allowing them to continue in the program despite personal characteristics or mental health issues that prevent them from developing professionally and personally. This article addresses this issue, examines legal implications and cases, and provides recommendations for counselor educators.
American Counseling Association. (1995). Code of ethics and standards of practice. Retrieved April 14, 2004, from http://aca.convio.net/site/PageServer?pagename=resources_ethics
2.
Anderson v. University of Wisconsin, 665, F.Supp, 1372-1372, (W.D. Wis, 1987) aff’d, 841 F.2d 737 (7th Cir. 1988).
3.
Association for Counselor Education and Supervision. (1993). Ethical guidelines for counseling supervisors. Retrieved April 15, 2003, from http://www.acesonline.net/ethicalguidelines.htm
4.
Baldo, T. D., Softas-Nall, B. C., & Shaw, S. F. (1997). Student review and retention in counselor education: An alternative to Frame and Stevens-Smith. Counselor Education and Supervision, 36, 245-253.
5.
Board of Curators of University of Missouri v. Horowitz, 435, U.S. 78 (1978).
6.
Bradey, J., & Post, P. (1991). Impaired students: Do we eliminate them from counselor education programs?Counselor Education and Supervision, 31, 100-108.
7.
Corey, G. (1991). Theory and practice of counseling and psychotherapy(4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
8.
Corey, G., Corey, M., & Callanan, P. (1993). Issues and ethics in the helping professions(4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
9.
Counsel for the Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs. (2001). CACREP 2001 standards. Retrieved April 14, 2004, from www.cacrep.org/2001Standards.html
10.
Doherty v. Southern College of Optometry, 862, F.2d570-570, U.S. 810 (1988).
11.
Emerson, S., (1995). Acounseling group for counselors. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 20, 221-231.
12.
Emerson, S.& Markos, P. (1996). Signs and symptoms of the impaired counselor. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 34, 108-118.
13.
Frame, M.,& Stevens-Smith, S. (1995). Out of harm’sway: Enhancing monitoring and dismissal processes in counselor education programs. Counselor Education and Supervision, 35, 118-129.
14.
Grenier v. Cyanamid Plastics, Inc., 70, F.3d667-667 (1995).
15.
Halasz v. University of New England, 92-52 (1993).
16.
Hensley, L. G., Smith, S. L., & Thompson, R. W. (2003). Assessing competencies of counselors-in training: Complexities in evaluating personal and professional development. Counselor Education and Supervision, 42, 219-230.
17.
International Association of Marriage& Family Counselors. (2001). International Association of Marriage and Family Counselors ethical code. Retrieved April 15, 2003, from www.iamfc.com/ethical_codes.html
18.
Jordan, K., & Quinn, W. (1996). Ethical concerns for supervising the impaired marriage and family therapist. Family Therapy, 23, 51-57.
19.
Kerl, S. B., Garcia, J. L., McCullough, S.,& Maxwell, M. E. (2002). Systematic evaluation of professional and performance: Legally supported procedures. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 321-334.
20.
Kotter, J., & Hazler, R. (1996). Impaired counselors: The dark side brought into light. The Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 34, 98-107.
21.
Lumadue, C. A. (1999). The role of graduate programs as gatekeepers: A model for evaluating student counselor competence. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39, 101-109.
22.
Myers, J. E., Mobley, A. K, & Booth, C. S. (2003). Wellness of counseling students: Practicing what we preach. Counselor Education and Supervision, 42, 264-274.
23.
Nagpal, S., & Ritchie, M. H. (2002). Selection interviews of master’s programs in counseling: An exploratory study. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 207-218.
24.
O’Donnell, J. M. (1998). The holistic health movement: Implications for counseling theory and practice. In R. Hayes & R. Aubrey (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change(pp. 365-382). Denver, CO: Love.
25.
Olsheski, J., & Leech, L. (1996). Programmatic interventions and treatment of impaired professionals. The Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 34, 128-139.
26.
Schwab, R., & Neukrug, E. (1994). A survey of counselor educator’s ethical concerns. Counseling and Values, 39, 42-55.
27.
Witmer, J. M., & Young, M. (1996). Preventing counselor impairment: A wellness approach. The Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 34, 141-155.
28.
Wood v. President& Trustees of Spring Hill College, 978, F.2d1214-1214 (1992).
