Emotionally focused therapy (EFT) has been described by one of its originators as an integration of structural family therapy and experiential psychotherapy. This article explores whether the integration that has been achieved in EFT is a theoretically eclectic integration, which preserves intact the theoretical bases of both of the approaches being integrated, or an assimilative integration, which privileges the theoretical base of one of the approaches and grafts ideas and techniques from the remaining approach onto this base. The conclusion is reached that EFT is an exercise in assimilative integration. It is demonstrated that EFT is rooted in the worldview and values of experiential therapy, and that elements of structural family therapy that have been incorporated into the model have been subjected to fundamental modification, so as to allow them to fit into an alien theoretical context.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244.
2.
Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base. New York: Basic Books.
3.
Breunlin, D. C., Schwartz, R. C., & Mac Kune-Karrer, B. (1992). Metaframeworks: Transcending the models of family therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Butler, M. H., & Gardner, B. C. (2003). Adapting enactments to couple reactivity: Five developmental stages. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29, 311-327.
5.
Dray, W. H. (1967). Holism and individualism in history and social science. In P. Edwards (Ed.), The encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 4, pp. 53-58). New York: Macmillan/Free Press.
6.
Fraenkel, P., & Pinsof, W. M. (2001). Teaching family therapy-centered integration: Assimilation and beyond. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 11, 59-85.
7.
Gurman, A. S., & Fraenkel, P. (2002). The history of couple therapy: A millennial review. Family Process, 41, 199-260.
8.
Hill, J., Fonagy, P., Safier, E., & Sargent, J. (2003). The ecology of attachment in the family. Family Process, 42, 205-221.
9.
Johnson, S. M. (1996). The practice of emotionally focused therapy: Creating connection. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
10.
Johnson, S. M., & Greenberg, L. S. (1988). Relating process to outcome in marital therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 14, 175-183.
11.
Johnson, S. M., Makinen, J. A., & Millikin, J. W. (2001). Attachment injuries in couple relationships: A new perspective on impasses in couples therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27, 145-155.
12.
Larmore, C. (1998). Right and good. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 8, pp. 322-325). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
13.
McBride, M. C., & Martin, G. E. (1990). A framework for eclecticism: The importance of theory to mental health counseling. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 12, 495-505.
14.
Messer, S. (1992). A critical examination of belief structures in integrative and eclectic psychotherapy. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 130-168). New York: Basic Books.
15.
Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., & Hubble, M. A. (1997). Escape from Babel: Toward a unifying language for psychotherapy practice. New York: Norton.
16.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17.
Minuchin, S., & Fishman, H. C. (1981). Family therapy techniques. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
Minuchin, S., Lee, W.-Y., & Simon, G. M. (1996). Mastering family therapy: Journeys of growth and transformation. New York: Wiley.
19.
Nichols, M. P., & Fellenberg, S. (2000). The effective use of enactments in family therapy: A discovery-oriented process study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26, 143-152.
20.
Nichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (1995). Family therapy: Concepts and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
21.
Pistole, M. C., & Arricale, F. (2003). Understanding attachment: Beliefs about conflict. Journal of Counseling and Development, 81, 318-328.
22.
Prochaska, J. O., & Norcross, J. C. (1994). Systems of psychotherapy: A transtheoretical analysis (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
23.
Rait, D. (1988). Survey results. Family Therapy Networker, 12, 52-56.
24.
Rothbaum, F., Rosen, K., Ujiie, T., & Uchida, N. (2002). Family systems theory, attachment theory, and culture. Family Process, 41, 328-350.
Satir, V., & Baldwin, M. (1983). Satir step by step: A guide to creating change in families. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books.
27.
Simon, G. M. (1989). An alternative defense of eclecticism: Responding to Kelly and Gintner. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 11, 280-288.
28.
Simon, G. M. (1991). Theoretical eclecticism: A goal we are obliged to pursue. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 13, 112-118.
29.
Simon, G. M. (1992). Having a second-order mind while doing first-order therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 18, 377-387.
30.
Simon, G. M. (1993). Revisiting the notion of hierarchy. Family Process, 32, 147-155.
31.
Simon, G. M. (1995). A revisionist rendering of structural family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21, 17-26.
32.
Simon, G. M. (2003). Beyond technique in family therapy: Finding your therapeutic voice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33.
Spiegel, J. (1971). Transactions: The interplay between individual, family, and society. New York: Science House.
34.
Stricker, G., & Gold, J. R. (1996). Psychotherapy integration: An assimilative, psychodynamic approach. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 3, 47-58.
35.
Taylor, C. C. W. (1998). Eudaimonism. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy (Vol. 3, pp. 450-452). London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
