The purpose of this study was to compare reported levels of marital quality, marital stability, and the marital processes of cohesion, flexibility, and communication in the marriages of nontraditional and traditional women. Selected data from the Marital Instability Over the Life Course Data Set were used. A subsample of 74 married women who were defined as nontraditional and a comparison group of 274 traditional women were selected according to their occupational status and gender role orientation. Nontraditional women included those reporting a nontraditional gender role orientation and employment in a professional or managerial position. Traditional women included those who reported a traditional gender role orientation and employment in a clerical, sales, service, or private household worker occupation. Results of repeated measures multivariate analysis of covariance indicated many similarities between the two groups; however, nontraditional women reported greater flexibility in their marriages. Implications of the findings for practice in clinical work with couples are addressed.
Altrocchi, J., & Crosby, R. D. (1989). Clarifying and measuring the concept of traditional vs. egalitarian roles in marriages. Sex Roles, 20, 639-648.
2.
Amato, P. R., & Booth, A. (1995). Changes in gender role attitudes and perceived marital quality. American Sociological Review, 60, 58-66.
3.
Baber, K., & Allen, K. (1992). Women and families: Feminist reconstructions. New York: Guilford Press.
4.
Bernard, J. (1978). Models for the relationship of the world of women and the world of men. In L. Kriesburg (Ed.), Research in social movements, conflict, and change (pp. 291-340). Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.
5.
Booth, A., Johnson, D., & Edwards, J. N. (1983). Measuring marital instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 387-393.
6.
Booth, A., Johnson, D., White, L., & Edwards, J. (1992). Marital instability over the life course: Methodology report and codebook for a three-wave panel study. Lincoln: Department of Sociology, University of Nebraska Press.
7.
Curry, C., Trew, K., Turner, I., & Hunter, J. (1994). The effect of life domains on girls’ possible selves. Adolescence, 29, 133-150.
8.
Deal, J. E., Wampler, K. S., & Halverson, C. F. (1992). The importance of similarity in the marital relationship. Family Process, 31, 369-382.
9.
Farrington, K., & Chertok, E. (1993). Social conflict theories of the family. In P. Boss, W. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. Schumm, & S. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 357-381). New York: Plenum Press.
10.
Ferree, M. M. (1991). The gender division of labor in two-earner marriages: Dimensions of variability and change. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 58-180.
11.
Fincham, F. D., & Linfield, K. J. (1997). A new look at marital quality: Can spouses feel positive and negative about their marriage?Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 489-502.
12.
Fitzpatrick, M. A., & Ritchie, L. D. (1993). Communication theory and the family. In P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach (pp. 565-585). New York: Plenum Press.
13.
Gavazzi, S. M., McKenry, P. C., Jacobson, J. A., Julian, T. W., & Lohman, B. (2000). Modeling the effects of expressed emotion, psychiatric symptomology, and marital quality levels on male and female verbal aggression. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 669-683.
14.
Gordon, K. C., & Baucom, D. H. (1999). The interactions between marital standards and communication patterns. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25, 211-224.
15.
Gottman, J. (1993). A theory of marital dissolution and stability. Journal of Family Psychology, 7, 57-75.
16.
Greeff, A. P. (2000). Characteristics of families that function well. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 948-962.
17.
Guilbert, D. E., Vacc, N. A., & Pasley, K. (2000). The relationship of gender role beliefs, negativity, distancing, and marital instability. The Family Journal, 8, 124-142.
18.
Hare-Mustin, R. (1988). Family changes and gender differences: Implications for theory and practice. Family Relations, 37, 36-41.
19.
Henderson, S., & Cunningham, J. (1993). Women’s emotional dependence on men: Scale construction and test of Russianoff’s hypothesis. Sex Roles, 28, 317-334.
20.
Holder, D. P., & Anderson, C. M. (1991). Women, work, and family. In M. McGoldrick, C. Anderson, & F. Walsh (Eds.), Women in families: A framework for family therapy (pp. 357-380). New York: Norton.
21.
Johnson, D., White, L., Edwards, J., & Booth, A. (1986). Dimensions of marital quality: Toward methodological and conceptual refinement. Journal of Family Issues, 7, 31-49.
22.
Kaufman, G. (2000). Do gender role attitudes matter? Family formation and dissolution among traditional and egalitarian men and women. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 128-144.
23.
Killorin, E., & Olson, D. (1984). The chaotic flippers in treatment. In E. Kaufman (Ed.), Power to change: Alcoholism (pp. 99-129). NY: Gardner Press.
24.
Larson, J. H., Hammond, C. H., & Harper, J. M. (1998). Perceived equity and intimacy in marriage. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 24, 487-506.
25.
Lemkau, J. P. (1983). Women in male-dominated professions: Distinguishing personality and background characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 144-165.
26.
Levine, L. B., & Busby, D. M. (1993). Co-creating shared realities with couples. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 15, 405-421.
27.
McNeal, C., & Amato, P. R. (1998). Parents’ marital violence: Long-term consequences for children. Journal of Family Issues, 19, 123-139.
28.
Miller, J. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.
29.
Murrell, A. J., Hanson-Frieze, I. H., & Frost, J. L. (1991). Aspiring to careers in male- and female-dominated professions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 103-126.
30.
O’Connell, L., Betz, M., & Kurth, S. (1989). Plans for balancing work and family life: Do women pursuing traditional and nontraditional careers differ?Sex Roles, 20, 35-45.
31.
Olson, D. (1991, November). Three-dimensional (3-D) circumplex model: Theoretical and methodological advances. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council on Family Relations Theory and Research Methodology Workshop, Denver, CO.
32.
Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 144-167.
33.
Roberts, B. W., & Helson, R. (1997). Changes in culture, changes in personality: The influence of individualism in a longitudinal study of women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 641-651.
34.
Robinson, J. P., & Milkie, M. A. (1998). Back to the basics: Trends in and role determinants of women’s attitudes toward housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 205-218.
35.
Rogers, S. J., & Amato, P. R. (2000). Have changes in gender relations affected marital quality?Social Forces, 79, 731-753.
36.
Rogge, R. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1999). Till violence does us part: The differing roles of communication and aggression in predicting adverse marital outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 340-351.
37.
Skowron, E. A. (2000). The role of differentiation of self in marital adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 229-237.
38.
Spanier, G. B., & Lewis, R. A. (1980). Measuring dyadic adjustment: A review of the seventies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 825-839.
39.
Standley, K., & Soule, B. (1974). Women in male-dominated professions: Contrasts in their personal and vocational histories. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 4, 245-258.
40.
Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate analysis. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
41.
Thomas, V., & Olson, D. (1993). Problem families and the circumplex model: Observational assessment using the clinical rating scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 19, 159-175.
42.
Thomas, V., & Ozechowski, T. J. (2000). A test of the circumplex model of marital and family systems using the clinical rating scale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26, 523-534.
43.
Thompson, L. (1993). Conceptualizing gender in marriage: The case of marital care. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 557-569.
44.
U. S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2000). Labor force statistics from the current population survey. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
45.
Vandewater, E. A., & Stewart, A. J. (1998). Making commitments, creating lives: Linking women’s roles and personality at midlife. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 717-738.
46.
Vermeulen, M. E., & Minor, C. W. (1998). Context of career decisions: Women reared in a rural community. Career Development Quarterly, 46, 230-245.
47.
Voydanoff, P., & Donnelly, B. (1999). The intersection of time in activities and perceived unfairness in relation to psychological distress and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 739-751.
48.
Walsh, F. (1991). Reconsidering gender in the marital quid pro quo. In M. McGoldrick, C. Anderson, & F. Walsh (Eds.), Women in families: A framework for family therapy (pp. 267-285). New York: Norton.
