This article uses two measures of state party ideology—a 1994 survey of state party committee members and a content analysis of state party platforms between 1990 and 1996—to determine variation between states in interparty ideological differences. These interparty ideological differ ences are compared to David Mayhew's scale measuring the historical presence of traditional party organizations in the American states. As hy pothesized, there is a strong tendency for states with histories of tradi tional party organization to have less ideologically polarized parties than those states without such traditions. This association holds up when we control for state-level measures of education, income, mass polarization, electoral competition, and party control. State environments that histori cally encouraged or discouraged the formation of traditional party orga nizations help explain variation in patterns of party activism in the contemporary era.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barrilleaux, Charles.1986. "A Dynamic Model of Partisan Competition in the American States." American Journal of Political Science30: 822-140.
2.
Bibby, John E, and Thomas M. Holbrook .1996. "Parties and Elections ." In Virginia Gray and Herbert Jacob, eds., Politics in the American States, 6th ed., pp 78-121. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly
3.
Costain, Anne N.1980. "Changes in the Role of Ideology in American National Nominating Conventions and Among Party Identifiers." Western Political Quarterly33: 73-86.
4.
Duverger, Maurice.1964. Political Parties. New York : Wiley.
5.
Dye, Thomas R.1984. "Party and Policy in the States." Journal of Politics46: 1097-1116.
6.
Elazar, Daniel J.1972. American Federalism: A View From the States . New York: Crowell.
7.
Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright, and John P McIver.1993. Statehouse Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
8.
Fitzpatrick, Jody L., and Rodney E. Hero.1988. "Political Culture and Political Characteristics of the American States: A Consideration of Some Old and New Questions." Western Political Quarterly41: 145-53.
9.
Fenton, John H.1966. Midwest Politics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
10.
Fishel, Jeff.1985. Presidents and Promises. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
11.
Fitzpatrick, Jody L., and Rodney E. Hero.1988. "Political Culture and Political Characteristics of the American States: A Consideration of Some Old and New Questions." Western Political Quarterly41: 145-53.
12.
Garand, James C.1985. "Partisan Change and Shifting Expenditures Priorities in the American States, 1945-1978." American Politics Quarterly13: 355-91.
13.
Ginsberg, Benjamin.1972. "Critical Elections and the Substance of Party Conflict, 1844-1968." Midwest Journal of Political Science16: 603-26.
14.
Hartz, Louis.1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt Brace.
15.
Holbrook, Thomas M., and Emily Van Dunk.1993. "Electoral Competition in the American States." American Political Science Review87: 955-62.
16.
Jennings, Edward.1979. "Competition, Constituencies, and Welfare Policies in the American States." American Political Science Review73: 414-29.
17.
Joslyn, Richard A.1980. "Manifestations of Elazar's Subcultures: State Public Opinion and the Content of Political Campaign Advertising." Publius10 (Spring): 37-58.
18.
Key, V.O., Jr.1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation . New York: Knopf.
19.
_. 1958. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, 4thed. New York: Crowell.
20.
King, James D.1994. "Political Culture, Registration Laws, and Voter Turnout Among the American States." Publius24 (Fall): 115-27.
21.
Kirkpatrick, Jeane.1976. The New Presidential Elite: Men and Women in National Politics. New York: Russell Sage.
22.
Lamis, Alexander.1990. The Two Party South. New York : Oxford University Press.
23.
Lunch, William M.1987. The Nationalization of American Politics . Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
Mayhew, David.1986. Placing Parties in American Politics . Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
25.
Miller, Warren E., and M. Kent Jennings .1986. Parties in Transition: A Longitudinal Study of Party Elites and Party Supporters. New York: Russell Sage.
26.
Paddock, Joel.1992. "Interparty Ideological Differences in 11 State Parties, 1956-1980." Western Political Quarterly45: 751-60.
27.
Pomper, Gerald.1974. Elections in America. New York : Dodd, Mead.
28.
Poole, Keith T. and Howard Rosenthal .1984. "The Polarization of American Politics." Journal of Politics46: 1061-79.
29.
Ranney, Austin.1976. "Parties in State Politics." In Herbert Jacob and Kenneth Vines, eds., Politics in the American States , 3d ed. Boston : Little, Brown.
30.
Reichley, James.1985. "The Rise of National Parties." In John Chubb and Paul Peterson, eds., The New Direction in American Politics , pp. 175-200. Washington, DC: Brookings.
31.
Sharkansky, Ira.1969. "The Utility of Elazar's Political Culture: A Research Note." Polity11 (Fall): 66-83.
32.
Sharkansky, Ira, and Richard I. Hofferbert .1969. "Dimensions of State Politics, Economics, and Public Policy." American Political Science Review63: 867-79.
33.
Sorauf, Frank J. and Paul A. Beck.1988. Party Politics in America , 6th ed. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
34.
Stone, Walter J., Ronald B. Rapoport and Alan 1. Abramowitz .1994. "Party Polarization: The Reagan Revolution and Beyond." In L. Sandy Maisel, ed., The Parties Respond: Changes in American Parties and Campaigns , pp 69-99. Boulder, CO: Westview.
35.
Wilson, James Q.1962. The Amateur Democrat. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
36.
Wirt, Frederick M.1991. "'Soft' Concepts and 'Hard' Data: A Research Review of Elazar's Political Culture." Publius21 (Spring): 1- 13.
