This article explores intergovernmental policy interactions between cen tral city, county, and suburban city governments in 186 metropolitan ar eas. Two hypotheses are developed to test the existence and shape of intergovernmental policy interactions between these governments. A com petition hypothesis, based on Tiebout's 1956 concept of interjurisdictional competition, posits that counties and cities compete in the developmen tal policy area by matching what other cities and counties do. A coopera tion hypothesis, based on the notion of the functional arrangements between local governments, posits that counties and cities cooperate in the public safety and education policy areas by supplementing others' policies or by substituting their policies with others' policies. The results of an analysis of local government expenditures indicate that local gov ernments compete as well as cooperate at the intergovernmental level and that intergovernmental policy competition is weaker than interjuris dictional policy competition. The article ends with a series of discussions on possible changes in the current local government system to mitigate the competition between cities and their counties.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations (ACIR).1964. The Problem of Special Districts in American Governments . Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
2.
. 1978. State Mandating, of Local Expenditures. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
3.
. 1991. Interjurisdictional Tax and Policy Competition: Good or Bad for the Federal System? Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
4.
_. 1992. Significant Features of Fiscal Federalism. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
5.
Banfield, Edward C., and James Q. Wilson .1963. City Politics. New York: Vintage.
6.
Bowman, Ann O'M.1988. Competition for Economic Development among Southeastern Cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly23 (4): 511-27.
7.
Clark, Terry, and Lorna C. Ferguson .1983. City Money. New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
Delsohn, Gary. "Regional Strategy Helped Solve Host of Critical Ills." Sacramento Bee, May 30, p. Al.
9.
DeLorenzo, Thomas J.1983. "Economic Competition and Political Competition: An Empirical Note." Public Choice37: 559-68.
10.
Dowding, Keith, Peter John, and Stephen Biggs.1994. "Tiebout: A Survey of the Empirical Literature." Urban Studies31 (4/5): 767-97.
11.
Downs, Anthony1994. New Visions for Metropolitan America. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
12.
Duncombe, Sydney, William Duncombe, and Richard Kinney.1992. "Factors Influencing Politics and Process of County Government Budgeting ." State and Local Government Review24 (1): 19-27.
13.
Dye, Thomas, and John Garcia.1978. "Structure, Function, and Policy in American Cities." Urban Affairs Quarterly14 (1): 103-22.
14.
Dye, Thomas.1990. American Federalism: Competition among Governments . Lexington, MA: Lexington Books .
15.
Ebel, Robert D.1991. "A Profile of County Finances." Intergovernmental Perspective. 17 (1): 14-17.
16.
Eberts, Randall W, and Timothy J. Gronberg .1990. "Structure, Conduct, and Performance in the Local Public Sector." National Tax Journal43 (2): 165-73.
17.
Elazar, Daniel J.1987. Exploring Federalism. Tuscaloosa : University of Alabama Press.
18.
Forbes, Kevin F., and Ernest M. Zampelli .1989. "Is Leviathan a Mythical Beast?" The American Economic Review79 (3): 568-77.
19.
Fox, William F.1986. "Tax Structure and the Location of Economic Activity along State Borders." National Tax Journal34 (4): 387-401.
20.
Green, Gary P, and Arnold Fleischmann.1991. "Promoting Economic Development: A Comparison of Central Cities, Suburbs, and Nonmetropolitan Communities." Urban Affairs Quarterly27 (1): 145-1554.
Harrigan, John J.1993. Political Change in theMetropolis , 5th ed. New YorkHarperCollins.
23.
International City Management Association (ICMA).1990. The Municipal Year Book. Washington, DC: ICMA.
24.
Kenyon, Daphne A., and John Kincaid.1991. Competition Among States and Local Governments. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
25.
Liebert, Roland.1974. "Municipal Functions, Structure, and Expenditures: A Reanalysis of Recent Research." Social Science Quarterly54 (March): 765-83.
26.
Lineberry, Robert, and Edward Fowler.1967. Reformism and Public Policy in American Cities. American Political Science Review61 (September): 701-16.
27.
Lowery, David, and William Lyons.1989. "The Impact of Jurisdictional Boundaries: An Individual Level Test of the Tiebout Model." Journal of Politics51: 73-97.
28.
Lowery, David, W.E. Lyons, Ruth Hoogland DeHood, Paul Teske, Mark Schneider, Michael Mintrom, and Sam Best.1995. "The Empirical Evidence for Citizen Information and a Local Market for Public Goods." American Political Science Review89 (3): 705-09.
29.
Marando, Vincent L., and Mavis Mann Reeves .1991" Counties as Local Governments: Research Issues and Questions." Journal of Urban Affairs13 (1): 45-53.
30.
Miller, Gary J.1981. Cities by Contract. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
Monday, E.H.1995. "To Be or Not to Be: Municipal Reversion and the Future of Virginia's Cities." University of Virginia NewsLetter71 (4): 1-8.
32.
O'Connor, Michael.1986. "Cities, Counties Enhance Business Incentive Programs Despite Federal Cutbacks. Site Selection Handbook31 (5): 1030-58.
33.
Ostrom, Elinor.1983. "A Public Choice Approach to Metropolitan Institutions: Structure, Incentives, and Performance." Social Science Journal20 (3): 79-95.
34.
Ostrom, Vincent, Charles Tiebout, and Robert Warren.1961. "The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas." American Political Science Review55: 835-42.
35.
Parks, Roger B., and Elinor Ostrom.1981. Developing and Testing Complex Models of Urban Service Systems. In Terry N. Clark, ed., Urban Policy Analysis: Directions for Future Research, pp. 171-99. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36.
Pederson, Rena.1993. "The Cancer in the Cities." The Dallas Morning News, September 12, p. 2J.
37.
Peirce, Neal R.1993. Citistates: How Urban America Can Prosper in a Competitive World. Washington, DC: Seven Locks Press.
38.
Peterson, Paul E.1981. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
. 1995. The Price of Federalism. Washington, DC: Brookings.
40.
Peterson, Paul E., and Mark Rom.1989. "American Federalism, Welfare Policy, and Residential Choices." American Political Science Review83 (3): 711-28.
41.
Rusk, David.1993. Cities Without Suburbs. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
42.
Schneider, Mark. 1986. "Fragmentation and the Growth of Local Government. Public Choice48: 255-64.
43.
_. 1989. The Competitive City: The Political Economy of Suburbia . Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
44.
Sharp, Elaine B.1991. "Theories of the Local Welfare Role." American Journal of Political Science. 35 (4): 934-50.
45.
Sjoquist, David L.1982. "The Effect of the Number of Local Governments on Central City Expenditures." National Tax Journal37: 79-88.
Teske, Paul, Mark Schneider, Michael Mintrom , and Samuel Best .1993. "Establishing the Micro Foundations of a Macro Theory: Information, Movers, and the Competitive Local Market for Public Goods." American Political Science Review87 (3): 702-13.
48.
Tiebout, Charles.1956. "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures." Journal of Political Economy64 (December): 416-24.
49.
U.S. Bureau of the Census.1988. County and City Data Book. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
50.
_. 1989. Census of Governments, 1987: Finance Statistics [computer file]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
51.
. 1990 . Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
52.
Virginia Code Commission.1995. Digest of the Acts of the General Assembly of Virginia at the 1995 Session . Richmond: Commonwealth of Virginia .
53.
Walker, David.1987. "Snow White and the 17 Dwarfs: From Metro Cooperation to Governance." National Civic Review76 (1): 14-27.
54.
Watson, Douglas J.1995. The New Civil War: Government Competition for Economic Development. Westport, CT: Praeger .
55.
White, Leonard D.1962. Originally published in 1926. Introduction to the Study of Public Administration, 4th ed. New York: Macmillan.
56.
Williams, John.1993. "Lanier Plotting Money Shuffle." TheHouston Chronicle, November 21, p. Cl.
57.
Wolman, Harold.1988. "Local Economic Development Policy: What Explains the Difference between Policy Analysis and Political Behavior?" Journal of Urban Affairs10 (1): 19-28.
58.
Wilson, Woodrow.1942. "The Study of Administration." Political Science Quarterly56 (December): 486-506. Originally published in Political Science Ouarterly1 (June 1887): 197-222.
