The influence of the social and political environment on candidacies and electability is an important element of political recruitment structures. We investigate several contextual factors that may affect the likelihood of women becoming candidates to, and members of, the British House of Commons and the U.S. House of Representatives. Using data from the 1992 British General Election and the 1992 U.S. congressional elections, we find both similarities and differences in the contexts promoting women's candidacies in the two countries. Overall, there is not an especially distinctive pattern in either country to women's candidacies or electability. Women have moved beyond "sacrificial lamb" status, but incumbency remains the most formi dable electoral barrier in both countries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldrich, John, and Forrest Nelson.1986. "Logit and Probit Models for Multi-variate Analysis with Qualitative Dependent Variables." In William D. Berry and Michael S. Lewis-Beck , eds., New Tools for Social Scientists. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Barone, Michael, ed. 1993. The Almanac of American Politics 1994. Washington, DC: National Journal.
3.
Bennett, Stephen Earl, and Linda L.M. Bennett.1992. "From Traditional to Modern Conceptions of Gender Equality in Politics: Gradual Change and Lingering Doubts." Western Political Quarterly45: 93-111.
4.
Berch, Neil.1996. "The 'Year of the Woman' in Context: A Test of Six Explanations." American Politics Quarterly24 (forthcoming).
5.
Bledsoe, Timothy, and Mary Herring.1990. "Victims of Circumstances: Women in Pursuit of Political Office." American Political Science Review84: 213-23.
6.
Bristow, Stephen.1980. "Women Councillors: An Explanation of the Underrepresentation of Women in Local Government." Local Government Studies May/June: 73-90.
7.
Burrell, Barbara C.1988. "The Political Opportunity of Women Candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives in 1984." Women and Politics8: 51-68.
8.
_. 1994. A Woman's Place Is in the HouseAnn Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9.
Carroll, Susan J.1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics, 2nd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
10.
Darcy, R.1992. "Electoral Barriers to Women." In Wilma Rule and Joseph Zimmerman , eds., The Impact of Electoral Systems on Minorities and Women in Comparative Perspective. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
11.
Darcy, R., Susan Welch, and Janet Clark.1994. Women, Elections, and Representation , 2nd ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
12.
Fowler, Linda.1993. Candidates, Congress and the American Democracy . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
13.
Gertzog, Irwin, and M. Michele Simard .1981. "Women and 'Hopeless' Congressional Candidacies." American Politics Quarterly9: 449-61.
14.
Hills, Jill.1981. "Candidates: The Impact of Gender." Parliamentary Affairs34: 221-28.
15.
Lovenduski, Joni, and Pippa Norris.1989. "Political Recruitment and the Masculine Candidate Model in the British General Election of 1987." European Journal of Political Research17: 533-62.
16.
_, eds. 1993. Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage.
17.
Nechemias, Carol.1987. "Changes in the Election of Women to U.S. State Legislative Seats." Legislative Studies Quarterly12: 125-42.
18.
Norris, Pippa.1987. Politics and Sexual Equality. Boulder, CO: Rienner.
19.
. 1993. "Britain." In Joni Lovenduski and Pippa Norris, eds., Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage.
20.
Pritchard, Anita.1992. "Changes in Electoral Structures and the Success of Women Candidates: The Case of Florida." Social Science Quarterly73: 62-70.
21.
Rasmussen, Jorgen.1977. "The Role of Women in British Parliamentary Elections ." Journal of Politics39: 1044-54.
22.
. 1983. "Women's Role in Contemporary British Politics: Impediments to Parliamentary Candidature." Parliamentary Affairs36: 300-315.
23.
Rule, Wilma.1981. "Why Women Don't Run: The Critical Contextual Factors in Women's Legislative Recruitment." Western Political Quarterly34: 60-77.
24.
_. 1987. "Electoral Systems, Contextual Factors, and Women's Opportunity for Election to Parliament in Twenty-Three Democracies."Western Political Quarterly40: 477-98.
25.
_. 1990. "Why More Women Are State Legislators: A Research Note ." Western Political Quarterly42: 437-48.
26.
Schlesinger, Joseph R.1966. Political Ambition. Chicago : Rand McNally.
27.
Studlar, Donley T., Ian McAllister, and Alvaro Ascui.1988. "Electing Women to the British Commons: Breakout from the Beleaguered Beachhead?" Legislative Studies Quarterly13: 515-28.
28.
Studlar, Donley T., and Susan Welch.1987. "Understanding the Iron Law of Andrarchy: The Effects of Candidate Gender on Voting for Local Office in Scotland." Comparative Political Studies20: 174-91.
29.
_. 1991. "Does District Magnitude Matter? Women Candidates in London Local Elections."Western Political Quarterly44: 457-66.
30.
The Times. 1992. Guide to the House of Commons 1992. London: Times Books Ltd.
31.
Vallance, Elizabeth.1984. "Women Candidates in the 1983 General Election ." Parliamentary Affairs37: 301-309.
32.
Welch, Susan, and Donley T. Studlar .1988. "The Effects of Candidate Gender on Voting for Local Office in England.' British Journal of Political Science18: 271-81.
33.
_. 1990. "Multi-Member Districts and the Representation of Women: Evidence from Britain and the United States." Journal of Politics52: 391-412.
