In this field essay I summarize recent findings on congressional elections with an eye toward identifying the gaps, contradictions, and questions that still remain. I organize the discussion around three related topics: candi dates, campaign finance, and voters. I examine our understanding of who runs and who does not run for Congress, and raise questions about the notion of challenger quality and how it has been measured. My focus then shifts to a discussion of the effects of money in congressional elections, highlighting unresolved questions about the influence of incumbent spending on election outcomes. I then examine the literature on voters in congressional elections, bringing together work that ties candidates and campaigns to their effects on individual voting decisions. I then conclude the essay by discussing how different research approaches might advance our understanding of congressional elections.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramowitz, Alan I.1980. "A Comparison of Voting for U.S. Senator and Representative ." American Political Science Review74: 633-40
2.
_ . 1988. "Explaining Senate Election Outcomes." American Political Science Review82: 385-403.
3.
_ . 1989. "Campaign Spending in U.S. Senate Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly14: 487-507.
4.
_ . 1991. "Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. Elections." Journal of Politics53: 34-56.
5.
Abramowitz, Alan I., Albert D. Cover, Helmut Norpoth .1986. "The President's Party in Midterm Elections: Going from Bad to Worse." American Journal of Political Science30: 562-76.
6.
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Jeffrey A. Segal .1992. Senate Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7.
Alesina, Alberto, and Howard Rosenthal.1989. "Partisan Cycles in Congressional Elections and the Maeroeeonomy ." American Political Science Review83: 373-98.
8.
Alford, John R., and David W. Brady.1993. "Personal and Partisan Advantage in U.S. Congressional Elections, 1846-1990" In Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer , ed., Congress Reconsidered, 5th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
9.
Alford, John, Holly Teeters, Daniel S. Ward, Rick K. Wilson. "Overdraft: The Political Costs of Congressional Malfeasance." Journal of Politics56: 788-801.
10.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, David Brady, and Morris Fiorina.1992. "The Vanishing Marginals and Electoral Responsiveness." British Journal of Political Science22: 21-38.
11.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Alan Gerber1994. "The Mismeasure of Campaign Spending: Evidence from the 1990 U.S. House Elections." Journal of Politics56: 1106-18.
12.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar.1994. "Effects of Advertising and News in Campaigns." Public Opinion Quarterly58: 335-57.
13.
Banks, Jeffrey, and D. Roderick Kiewiet .1989. "Explaining Patterns of Candidate Competition in Congressional Elections." American Journal of Political Science33: 997-1015.
14.
Bartels, Larry M.1991. "Instrumental and 'Quasi-Instrumental' Variables." American Journal of Political Science35: 777-800.
15.
Bauer, Monica, and John R. Hibbing .1989. "Which Incumbents Lose in House Elections: A Response to Jacobson's 'The Marginals Never Vanished." American Journal of Political Science33: 262-71.
16.
Bianco, William T.1984. "Strategic Decisions on Candidacy in U.S. Congressional Districts." Legislative Studies Quarterly9: 351-64.
17.
Biersack, Robert, Paul S. Herrnson, and Clyde Wilcox.1993. "Seeds for Success: Early Money in Congressional Elections ." Legislative Studies Quarterly18: 535-51.
18.
Bond, Jon R., Cary Covington, and Richard Fleisher.1985. "Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections." Journal of Politics47: 510-29.
19.
Born, Richard.1986. "Strategic Politicians and Unresponsive Voters." American Political Science Review80: 599-612.
20.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Charles H. Franklin .1995. "The Long Campaign: Senate Elections in 1992." In Herbert F. Weisberg , ed., Democracy's Feast: Elections in AmericaChatham, NJ: Chatham House.
21.
Brophy-Baermann, Michelle.1994. "Follow the Bouncing Checks: Local and National Press Coverage of the House Bank Scandal." Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
22.
_ . 1995. "When the Local Press Isn't Kind: A Tale of Six House Incumbents in the News." Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
23.
Campbell, James E.1993. The Presidential Pulse of Congressional Elections. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.
24.
Campbell, James E., John R. Alford, and Keith Henry.1984. "Television Markets and Congressional Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly9: 665-78.
25.
Canon, David T.1990. Actors, Athletes, and Astronauts: Political Amateurs in the United States Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
_ . 1993. "Sacrificial Lambs or Strategic Politicians? Political Amateurs in U.S. House Elections." American Journal of Political Science37: 1119-41.
27.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox.1994. "Issue Voting in U.S. Senate Elections: The Abortion Issue in 1990." Congress & The Presidency21: 99-111.
28.
Epstein, David, and Peter Zemsky.1995. "Money Talks: Deterring Quality Challengers in Congressional Elections." American Political Science Review89: 295-308.
29.
Erikson, Robert S.1990a. "Economic Conditions and the Congressional Vote: A Review of the Macrolevel Evidence." American Journal of Political Science34: 373-99.
30.
_ . 1990b. "Reply to Jacobson." American Journal of Political Science34: 405-07.
31.
Fiorina, Morris P1981a. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
32.
_ . 1981b. "Some Problems in Studying the Effects Of Resource Allocation in Congressional Elections." American Journal of Political Science25: 543-067.
33.
Fishel, Jeff.1973. Party and Organization: Congressional Challengers in American Politics. New York: McKay.
34.
Fowler, Linda L.1993. Candidates, Congress, and the American Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
35.
Fowler, Linda L. and Robert D. McClure .1989. Political Ambition: Who Decides to Run for Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.
36.
Frances, Wayne L., Lawrence W. Kenny, Rebecca B. Morton, and Amy B. Schmidt.1994. "Retrospective Voting and Political Mobility." American Journal of Political Science38: 099-1024.
37.
Franklin, Charles H.1991. "Eschewing Obfuscation? Campaigns and the Perception of U.S. Senate Incumbents." American Political Science Review85: 1193-1214.
38.
Garand, James C., and Donald A. Gross .1984. "Changes in the Vote Margins for Congressional Candidates: A Specification of Historic Trends." American Political Science Review78: 17-30.
39.
Garand, James C., Kenneth Wink, and Bryan Vincent.1993. "Changing Meanings of Electoral Marginality in U.S. House Elections, 1824-1978. Political Research Quarterly46: 27-48.
40.
Goidel, Robert K., and Donald A. Gross .1994. "A Systems Approach to Campaign Finance in U.S. House Elections." American Politics Quarterly22: 125-53.
41.
Goidel, Robert K., and Todd G. Shields .1994. "The Vanishing Marginals, the Bandwagon, and the Mass Media." Journal of Politics56: 802-10.
42.
Goldenberg, Edie N., and Michael W. Traugott .1984. Campaigning for Congress . Washington, DC: CQ Press.
43.
_ . 1987. "Mass Media in U.S. Congressional Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly12: 317-39.
44.
Goldenberg, Edie N., Michael W. Traugott, and Frank Baumgartner.1986. "Preemptive and Reactive Spending in U.S. House Races ." Political Behavior8: 3-20.
45.
Green, Donald Philip, and Jonathan S. Krasno .1988. "Salvation for the Spend-thrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections ." American Journal of Political Science32: 884-907.
46.
_. 1990. "Rebuttal to Jacobson's 'New Evidence for Old Arguments' ." American Journal of Political Science34: 363-72.
47.
Herrnson, Paul S.1988. Party Campaigning in the 1980s. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
48.
_ . 1995. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington . Washington, DC: CQ Press.
49.
Hermson, Paul S., and James G. Gimpel .1995. "District Conditions and Primary Divisiveness in Congressional Elections." Political Research Quarterly48: 117-34.
50.
Hibbing, John R., and John R. Alford.1990. "Constituency Population and Representation in the U.S. Senate." Legislative Studies Quarterly15: 581-98.
51.
Hinckley, Barbara.1980a. "The American Voter in Congressional Elections." American Political Science Review74: 641-50.
52.
_. 1980b. "House Re-Elections and Senate Defeats: The Role of the Challenger." British Journal of Political Science10: 441-60.
53.
Huckshorn, Robert J., and Robert C. Spencer1971. The Politics of Defeat. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
54.
Jacobson, Gary C.1978. "The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections ." American Political Science Review" 72: 769-83.
55.
_. 1980. Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
56.
_ . 1987. "The Marginals Never Vanished: Incumbency and Competition in Elections for the U.S. House of Representatives, 1952-82." American Journal of Political Science31: 126-41.
57.
_. 1989. "Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of House Elections, 1946-1986." American Political Science Review83: 773-93.
58.
_ . 1990a. The Electoral Origins of Divided Government: Competition in U.S. House Elections, 1946-1988. Boulder, CO: Westview.
59.
_ . 1990b. "The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments." American Journal of Political Science34: 334-62.
60.
_ . 1990c. "Does the Economy Matter in Congressional Elections." American Journal of Political Science34: 400-04.
61.
_ . 1992. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 3rd ed. New York: HarperCollins .
62.
Jacobson, Gary C., and Michael A. Dimock .1994. "Checking Out: The Effects of Bank Overdrafts on the 1992 House Elections. American Journal of Political Science38: 601-24.
63.
Jacobson, Gary C., and Samuel Kernell.1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
64.
_ . 1990. "National Forces in the 1986 U.S. House Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly15: 65-87.
65.
Jacobson, Gary C., and Raymond E. Wolfinger .1989. "Information and Voting in California Senate Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly . 14: 509-29.
66.
Johannes, John R.1984. To Serve the People. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
67.
Johannes, John R., and John C. McAdams .1981. "The Congressional Incumbency Effect: Is It Casework, Policy Compatibility, or Something Else? An Examination of the 1978 Election." American Journal of Political Science25: 512-42.
68.
Kahn, Kim Fridkin.1992. "Does Being Male Help? An Investigation of the Effects of Candidate Gender and Campaign Coverage on Evaluations of U.S. Senate Candidates ." Journal of Politics54: 497-517.
69.
_ . 1993. "Incumbency and the News Media in U.S. Senate Elections: An Experimental Investigation." Political Research Quarterly46: 715-40.
70.
_ . 1994. "Does Gender Make a Difference? An Experimental Examination of Sex Stereotypes and Press Patterns in Statewide Campaigns."American Journal of Political Science38: 162-95.
71.
Kazee, Thomas A.1980. "The Decision to Run for the U.S. Congress: Challenger Attitudes in the 1970s." Legislative Studies Quarterly5: 79-100.
72.
_, ed. 1994. Who Runs for Congress?: Ambition, Context, and Candidate EmergenceWashington, DC: CQ Press .
73.
Kazee, Thomas A., and Mary C. Thornberry .1990. "Where's the Party? Congressional Candidate Recruitment and American Party Organizations." Western Political Quarterly43: 61-80.
74.
Kenny, Christopher, and Michael McBumett .1992. "A Dynamic Model of the Effect of Campaign Spending on Congressional Vote Choice." American Journal of Political Science36: 923-37.
75.
_ . 1994. "An Individual-Level Multiequation Model of Expenditure Effects in Contested House Elections." American Political Science Review88: 699-707.
76.
Kiewiet, D. Roderick.1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
77.
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Langche Zeng.1993. "An Analysis of Congressional Career Decisions, 1947-1986." American Political Review87: 928-41.
78.
Kramer, Gerald.1971. "Short-Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896-1964." AmericanPolitical Science Review65: 131-43.
79.
_ . 1983. "The Ecological Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate vs. Individual-Level Findings on Economics and Elections, and Sociotropic Voting."American Political Science Review77: 92-111.
80.
Krasno, Jonathan S.1994. Challengers, Competition, and Reelection: Comparing Senate and House Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
81.
Krasno, Jonathan S., and Donald Philip Green.1988. "Preempting Quality Challengers in House Elections." Journal of Politics50: 920-36.
82.
Krasno, Jonathan S., Donald Philip Green, and Jonathan A. Cowden.1994. "The Dynamics of Campaign Fundraising in House Elections." Journal of Politics56: 459-74.
83.
Leuthold, David A.1968. Electioneering in a Democracy. New York: Wiley.
84.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Tom W Rice.1992. Forecasting Elections. Washing ton, DC: CQ Press.
85.
Lockerbie, Brad.1991. "Prospective Economic Voting in U.S. House Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly16: 239-62.
86.
Lodge, Milton, Marco R. Steenbergen, and Shawn Brau.1995. "The Responsive Voter: Campaign Information and the Dynamics of Candidate Evaluation." American Political Science Review89: 309-26.
87.
Lublin, David Ian.1994. "Quality, Not Quantity: Strategic Politicians in U.S. Senate Elections, 1952-1990." Journal of Politics56: 228-41.
88.
Lynch, G. Patrick, and Michael C. Munger .1995. "Congress and the Economy: How are Midterm Elections Different?" Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
89.
Maisel, L. Sandy.1992. "Quality Candidates in House and Senate Elections, from 1982 to 1990." In Allen D. Hertzke and Ronald M. Peters, Jr., eds., The Atomistic Congress: An Interpretation of Congressional Change. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
90.
Maisel, L. Sandy, Linda L. Fowler, Ruth S. Jones, and Walter J. Stone .1990. "The Naming of Candidates: Recruitment or Emergence?" In L. Sandy Maisel , ed. The Parties Respond: Changes in the American Party System. Boulder, CO: Westview.
91.
Mann, Thomas E., and Raymond E. Wolfinger .1980. "Candidates and Parties in Congressional Elections." American Political Science Review74: 617-32.
92.
McAdams, John C., and John R. Johannes .1981. "Does Casework Matter? A Reply to Professor Fiorina." American Journal of Political Science25: 581-604.
93.
Miller, Arthur H.1990. "Public Judgements of Senate and House Candidates." Legislative Studies Quarterly15: 525-42.
94.
Nesbit, Dorothy Davidson.1988. Videostyle in Senate Campaigns. Knoxville : University of Tennessee Press.
95.
Niemi, Richard G., and Herbert F. Weisberg, eds. 1993. Controversies in Voting Behavior, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
96.
Paolino, Phillip.1995. "Group Salient Issues and Group Representation: Support for Women Candidates in the 1992 Senate Elections." American Journal of Political Science39: 294-313.
97.
Patterson, Samuel C., and Thomas W. Kephart .1991. "The Case of the Wayfaring Challenger: The 1988 Senate Election in Ohio." Congress & The Presidency18: 105-20.
98.
Radcliff, Benjamin.1988. "Solving a Puzzle: Aggregate Analysis and Economic Voting Revisited." Journal of Politics50: 440-58.
99.
Ragsdale, Lyn.1994. "Old Approaches and New Challenges in Legislative Election Research." Legislative Studies Quarterly19: 537-82.
100.
Ragsdale, Lyn, and Timothy E. Cook .1987. "Representatives' Actions and Challengers' Reactions: Limits to Candidate Connections in the House." American Journal of Political Science31: 45-81.
101.
Rahn, Wendy M., John H. Aldrich, and Eugene Borgida.1994. "Individual and Contextual Variations in Political Candidate Appraisal." American Political Science Review88: 193-99.
102.
Rivers, Douglas, and Morris P Fiorina .1989. "Constituency Service, Reputation, and the Incumbency Advantage." In Morris P Fiorina and David W Rohde, eds., Home Style and Washington Work. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
103.
Rohde, David W1979. "Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the United States House of Representatives." American Journal of Political Science23: 1-26.
104.
Rosenberg, Shawn W., Lisa Bohan, Patrick McCafferty, and Kevin Harris.1986. "The Image and the Vote: The Effect of Candidate Presentation on Voter Preference." American Journal of Political Science30: 108-27.
105.
Segura, Gary M., and Stephen P Nicholson .1995. "Sequential Choices and Partisan Transitions in U.S. Senate Delegations: 1972-1988." Journal of Politics57: 86-100.
106.
Serra, George.1994. "What's in it for Me? The Impact of Congressional Casework on Incumbent Evaluation."American Politics Quarterly22: 403-20.
107.
Serra, George, and Albert D. Cover1992. "The Electoral Consequences of Perquisite Use: The Casework Case." Legislative Studies Quarterly17: 233-46.
108.
Serra, George, and David Moon.1994. "Casework, Issues, and Voting in Congressional Elections: A District Analysis" Journal of Politics56: 200-13.
109.
Sinclair, Barbara.1990. "Washington Behavior and Home-State Reputation: The Impact of National Prominence of Senators' Images." Legislative Studies Quarterly15: 475-94.
110.
Smith, Eric R. A. N.1989. The Unchanging American Voter. Berkeley : University of California Press.
111.
Smith, Richard A.1995. "Interest Group Influence in the U.S. Congress." Legislative Studies Quarterly20: 89-139.
112.
Sniderman, Paul M., Henry E. Brady, and Philip E. Tetlock .1994. "The Multi-Investigator Common Vehicle." Public Opinions 1: 10-11.
113.
Snowiss, Leo.1966. "Congressional Recruitment and Representation." American Political Science Review60: 627-39.
114.
Squire, Peverill.1989a. "Challengers in U.S. Senate Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly14: 531-47.
115.
_ 1989b. "Competition and Uncontested Seats in U.S. House Elections ." Legislative Studies Quarterly14: 281-95.
116.
_ . 1991. "Preemptive Fundraising and Challenger Profile in Senate Elections." Journal of Politics53: 1150-64.
117.
_ . 1992a. "Challenger Quality and Voting Behavior in Senate Elections ." Legislative Studies Quarterly17: 247-63.
118.
_ . 1992b. "Challenger Profile and Gubernatorial Elections." Western Political Quarterly45: 125-42.
119.
Squire, Peverill, and Christina Fastnow.1994. "Comparing Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections." Political Research Quarterly47: 705-20.
120.
Squire, Peverill, and Eric R. A. N. Smith. N.d. "A Further Examination of Challenger Quality in Senate Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly. Forthcoming.
121.
Squire, Peverill, and John R. Wright.1990. "Fundraising by Nonincumbent Candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives." Legislative Studies Quarterly15: 89-98.
122.
Stewart, Charles, Iii.1989. "A Sequential Model of U.S. Senate Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly14: 567-601.
123.
Stewart, Charles, Iii., and Mark Reynolds.1990. "Television Markets and Senate Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly15: 495-523.
124.
Stigler, George.1973. "General Economic Conditions and National Elections." American Economic Review63: 160-67.
125.
Thomas, Scott J.1989. "Do Incumbent Campaign Expenditures Matter?" Journal of Politics51: 965-76.
126.
Tufte, Edward.1975. "Determinants of Midterm Congressional Elections." American Political Science Review69: 812-26.
127.
Westlye, Mark C.1991. Senate Elections and Campaign Intensity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
128.
Wilcox, Clyde.1988. "I Owe it all to Me: Candidates' Investments in Their Own Campaigns." American Politics Quarterly16: 266-79.
129.
Wright, Gerald C.1989. "Policy Voting in the U.S. Senate: Who is Represented? " Legislative Studies Quarterly14: 465-86.
130.
Wright, Gerald C., Michael B. Berkman.1986. "Candidates and Policy in United States Senate Elections." American Political Science Review80: 567-88.
131.
Wrighton, J. Mark, and Peverill Squire .1995. "Uncontested Seats and Electoral Competition for the U.S. House of Representatives Over Time." Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
132.
Zaller, John.1989. "Bringing Converse Back In: Information Flow in Political Campaigns." PoliticalAnalysis1: 181-234.
