This study examines the collective voting behavior of the United States Supreme Court in civil rights and liberties decisions for the 1986-87 through the 1991-92 terms to determine if the Court has become signifi cantly more conservative and, if changes have occurred, to determine the reasons for these changes. Despite the efforts of Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush to pack the Court with judicial conservatives, the Re hnquist Court during this period was more liberal in its voting behavior than the Burger Court was in its last decade. Membership change, changes in the voting behavior of continuing members of the Court, and issue change all appear to have influenced the collective voting of the Rehnquist Court, with the result that the Court has not been as conservative as liber als had feared and conservatives had anticipated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abraham, Henry.1992. Justices and Presidents: a Political History of Appointments to the Supreme Court, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Baum,Lawrence.1987. "Explaining the Burger Court's Support for Civil Liberties " PS20: 21-28.
3.
_ . 1988. "Measuring Policy Change in the U.S. Supreme Court." American Political Science Review82: 905-12.
4.
_ . 1992. "Membership Change and Collective Voting Change in the United States Supreme Court." Journal of Politics54: 3-24.
5.
Brisbin, Richard A., Jr. 1990. "The Conservatism of Antonin Scalia." Political Science Quarterly115: 1-29.
6.
Chemerinsky, Erwin.1989. "Forward: The Vanishing Constitution." Harvard Law Review103: 43-73.
7.
Coyle, Marcia. 1991. "Complete Control." National Law Journal13: S1-S3.
8.
Decker, John F1993. Revolution to the Right: Criminal Procedure Jurisprudence During the Burger-Rehnquist Court Era. New York: Garland Press.
9.
Domino, John C.1994. Civil Rights and Liberties: Toward the 21st Century. New York: HarperCollins.
10.
Epstein, Lee, and Joseph F. Kobylka .1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
11.
Friedelbaum, Stanley H.1991. "Justice William J. Brennan, Jr.: Policy-Making in the Judicial Thicket." In Charles Lamb and Steven Halpem, eds., The Burger Court: Political and Judicial Profiles. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
12.
Goldman, Sheldon.1987. "Reagan's Second Term Judicial Appointments: The Battle at Midway." Judicature70: 324-39.
13.
_ . 1991a. "The Bush Imprint on the Judiciary: Carrying on a Tradition ." Judicature74: 294-303.
14.
_. 1991b. Constitutional Law: Cases and Essays, 2nd ed. New York: HarperCollins.
15.
Greenhouse, Linda.1991. "New Term to Test Supreme Court's New Majority." New York Times November 7: All.
16.
Irons, Peter1990. The Courage of Their ConvictionsNew York: Penguin Books.
17.
Johnson, Scott P, and Christopher E. Smith.1992. "David Souter's First Term on the Supreme Court: The Impact of a New Justice." Judicature75: 238-43.
18.
Kairys, David.1993. With Liberty and Justice for Some: A Critique of the Conservative Supreme Court. New York: The New Press.
19.
Louthan, William.1991. The United States Supreme Court. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20.
Marshall, Thurgood.1990. "A Tribute to Justice William J. Brennan." Harvard Law Review104: 1-8.
21.
Melone, Albert P1990. "Revisiting the Freshman Effect Hypothesis: The First Two Terms of Justice Kennedy." Judicature74: 6-13.
22.
Mishler, William, and Reginald S. Sheehan .1993. "The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions." American Political Science Review87: 87-101.
23.
O'Brien, David M.1987. "The Supreme Court: From Warren to Burger." PS: Political Science and Politics20: 12-20.
Pacelle, Richard.1991. the Transformation of the Supreme Court's Agenda from the New Deal to the Reagan Administration. Boulder, CO : Westview Press.
26.
Perry, H.W., Jr. 1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Savage, David G.1992. Turning Right: the Making of the Rehnquist Court. New York: Wiley.
28.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Harold J. Spaeth .1989. "Decisional Trends on the Warren and Burger Courts: Results from the Supreme Court Data Base Project ." Judicature73: 103-107.
29.
_ . 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Smith, Christopher E.1990. 'Justice Antonin Scalia and the Institutions of American Government." Wake Forest Law Review25: 783-809.
31.
Smith, Christopher E., and Thomas R. Hensley .1993. "Assessing the Conservatism of the Rehnquist Court." Judicature76: 83-89.
32.
Smith, Christopher E., and Scott P Johnson .1993. "The First-Term Performance of Justice Clarence Thomas." Judicature76: 172-78.
33.
Spaeth, Harold J.1993. United States Supreme Court Judicial Data Base, 1953-1991 Terms. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
34.
Walker, Thomas, and Lee Epstein.1993. The Supreme Court of the United States: An Introduction . New York: St. Martins.
