Rational choice theory has yet to provide a satisfactory explanation of voter turnout. One such account, minimax regret, is analyzed using data from a survey involving students at two Canadian universities during the 1993 Canadian federal election campaign. While the minimax regret hypothesis is supported at the bivariate level, it fails to pass a multivariate test in which other components of the calculus of voting are included. Minimax regret appears to be little more than a rationalization on the part of those having a strong sense of duty to vote.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, P.R., J.H. Aldrich, P. Paolino, and D.W. Rhode.1992. "Sophisticated Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries." American Journal of Political Science86: 55-69.
2.
Aldrich, J.H.1993. "Rational Choice and Turnout." American Journal of Political Science37: 246-78.
3.
Barry, B.1970. Sociologists, Economists, and Democracy. London: Collier-Macmillan.
4.
Beck, N.1975. "The Paradox of Minimax Regret." American Political Science Review69: 918.
5.
Blais, A., and R. Young.1994. "Does Public Choice Erode Public Spirit? An Experiment in Rationality, Electoral Norms, and Voting Behavior." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Public Choice Society , Austin, March 29.
6.
Cox, G.W., and M.C. Munger.1989. "Closeness, Expenditures, and Turnout in the 1988 U.S. House Elections." American Political Science Review83: 217-31.
7.
Dennis, J.1991. "Theories of Turnout: An Empirical Comparison of Alienationist and Rationalist Perspectives." In William Crotty, ed., Political Participation and American Democracy . New York: Greenwood Press.
8.
Dillman, D.A.1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: A Total Design Method. New York: Wiley.
9.
Downs, A.1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
10.
Ferejohn, J.A., and M.P. Fiorina.1974. "The Paradox of Not Voting: A Decision Theoretic Analysis." American Political Science Review68: 525-36.
11.
_ . 1975. "Closeness Only Counts in Horseshoes and Dancing." American Political Science Review69: 920-25.
12.
Green, D.P., and I. Shapiro.1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven : Yale University Press.
13.
Kenny, P.J., and T.W. Rice.1989. "An Empirical Examination of the Minimax Hypothesis." American Politics Quarterly17: 153-62.
14.
Mayer, L.S., and I.J. Good.1975. "Is Minimax Regret Applicable to Voting Decisions?" American Political Science Review69: 916-17.
15.
Mueller, D.C.1989. Public Choice II. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Pammett, J.1991. "Voting Turnout in Canada." In H. Bakvis, ed., Voter Turnout in CanadaToronto: Dundurn.
17.
Riker, W.H., and P.C. Ordeshook.1968. "A Theory of the Calculus of Voting."American Political Science Review62: 25-43.
18.
Stephens, S.V.1975. "The Paradox of Not Voting: A Comment." American Political Science Review69: 914-15.
19.
Strom, G.S.1975. "On the Apparent Paradox of Participation: A New Proposal ." American Political Science Review69: 908-13.
20.
Sudman, S., and N.M. Bradburn.1987. Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
