This paper disaggregates change among Democratic and Republican elites in the 1980s. Using data about the views of delegates to the 1980, 1984 and 1988 national party conventions, I examine the relative contributions of conversion and replacement coupled with the preference for candidates among party activists. The analysis of the effects of preferences for candi dates and the ideological positions of the delegates revealed that regardless of whether the activists are veterans or newcomers, support for particular candidates plays an important role in the shaping of the parties' aggregate ideological orientation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brams, Steven J.1978. The Presidential Election Game. New Haven: Yale University Press.
2.
Ceasar, James W.1982. Reforming the Reforms. Cambridge, MA : Ballinger.
3.
Epstein, Leon D.1980. Political Parties in Western Democracies. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
4.
Herrera, Richard.1992. "The Understanding of Ideological Labels by Political Elites: A Research Note." Western Political Quarterly45: 1021-35.
5.
Hirschman, Albert O.1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Kelley, Stanley Jr. 1956. Professional Public Relations and Political PowerBaltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.
7.
Key, V.O., Jr. 1964. Politics, Parties, & Pressure Groups, 5th ed. New York: Crowell .
8.
Lengle, James I.1981. Representation and Presidential Primaries. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
9.
Maisel, L. Sandy.1994. "The Platform-Writing Process: Candidate-Centered Platforms in 1992." Political Science Quarterly108: 671-98.
10.
Miller, Warren E.1988. Without Consent. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.
11.
Miller, Warren E., and M. Kent Jennings .1986. Parties in Transition. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
12.
Pareto, Vilfredo.1935. The Mind and Society. Arthur Livingston, ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
13.
Petrocik, John R., and Dwaine Marvick. 1983. "Explaining Party Elite Transformation: Institutional Changes and Insurgent Politics." Western Political Quarterly36: 345-63.
14.
Polsby, Nelson W1983. Consequences of Party Reform. New York : Oxford University Press.
15.
Ranney, Austin.1975. Curing the Mischiefs of Faction: Party Reform in America . Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Rapoport, Ronald B., and Walter J. Stone .1994. "A Model for Disaggregating Political Change." Political Behavior, 16: 505-32.
17.
Sorauf, Frank J., and Paul Allen Beck .1988. Party Politics in America . Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman .
18.
Stone, Walter J.1986. "The Carryover Effect in Presidential Elections ." American Political Science Review80: 271-79.
19.
_ . 1994. "Asymmetries in the Electoral Bases of Representation, Nomination Politics, and Partisan Change." In Lawrence C. Dodd and Calvin Jillson, eds., New Perspectives on American Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
20.
Stone, Walter J., Lonna Rae Atkeson, and Ronald B. Rapoport .1992. "Turning On or Turning Off? Mobilization and Demobilization Effects of Participation in Presidential Nomination Campaigns." American Journal of Political Science36: 665-91.
21.
Stone, Walter J., Ronald B. Rapoport, and Alan I. Abramowitz .1990. "The Reagan Revolution and Party Polarization in the 1980s. In L. Sandy Maisel, ed., The Parties Respond. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
22.
Wattenberg, Martin P1991. The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
