Constitutional regimes may be divided into three types, the Single Lawgiver Model, the Immemorial Customs and Usages Model, and the Constitutional Convention Model. Each type provides for change differently. The first type of constitution, common in ancient regimes, is typically founded by a single individual, justified by divine authority, and difficult to change. The second model, with less discrete beginnings, claims to be the product of the distilled wisdom of time and experience. While in some such systems, the legislature is technically sovereign and the constitution is therefore quite "flexible," typically change proceeds quite slowly, and major changes may prove difficult to accommodate. In the third model, a constitutional convention writes a constitution superior to ordinary legislation and provides for formal changes in discrete increments. This model, formulated in America, has not been instituted in pure form, and shares characteristics of the other two. The overlap among these models continues to explain and influence modem debates about constitutional change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackerman, Bruce.1991. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA.: Belknap Press.
2.
Amar, Akil R.1988. "Philadelphia Revisited: Amending the Constitution Outside Article V." University of Chicago Law Review55: 1043-1104.
3.
Baker, J.H.1979. An Introduction to English Legal History. London: Butterworths.
4.
Blackstone, William.1973. The Sovereignty of the Law: Selections From Blackstone's Commentaries on the Law ofEngland. ed. Gareth Jones. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Bryce, James, 1980. "Flexible and Rigid Constitution." Constitutions. Germany: Scientia VerlagAalen: Reprint of New York and London editions of 1905.
7.
Burke, Edmund.1910. Reflections on the Revolution in France. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.
8.
Cahn, Edmond.1954. "An American Contribution." In Cahn, ed., Supreme Court and Supreme Law. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9.
Caplan, Russell L.1988. Constitutional Brinkmanship: Amending the Constitution by National Convention. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Cicero, Marcus Tullius.1976. On the Commonwealth, trans. George H. Sabine and Stanley B. Smith. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill .
11.
Cobbett, William.1808. Parliamentary History of England From the Norman Conquest in 1066 to the Year 1803. London: R. Bagshaw.
12.
Corwin, Edward S.1936. "The Constitution as Instrument and as Symbol." American Political Science Review30: 1071-85.
13.
_. 1955. The 'Higher Law' Background of American Constitutional LawIthaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14.
Elazar, Daniel J.1980. "The Political Theory of Covenant: Biblical Origins and Modem Developments." Publius10: 3-30.
15.
Fisher, Sidney George, 1972 reprint of 1862 ed. The Trial of the Constitution . New York: Da Capo Press.
16.
Foley, Michael.1989. The Silence of Constitutions: Gaps, 'Abeyances,' and Political Temperament in the Maintenance of Government. London: Routledge.
17.
Gardiner, Samuel R., ed. 1936 reprint. The Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution, 1625-1660 . Oxford: Clarendon Press.
18.
Germino, Dante.1972. Modern Western Political Thought: Machiavelli to Marx . Chicago: Rand McNally.
19.
Grabner, Mark A.1984. "Our (Im)Perfect Constitution." Review of Politics51: 86-106.
20.
Grimes, Alan P.1978. Democracy and the Amendments to the Constitution . Lexington, MA.: Lexington Books .
21.
Hale, Matthew.1971. The History of the Common Law ofEngland, ed. Charles M. Gray. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
22.
Hale, Matthew.1787. "Considerations Touching the Amendment or Alteration of Lawes." In Francis Hargrave, ed., A Collection of Tracts Relative to the Laws of England From Manuscripts, Dublin : Printed for E. Lynch et al.
23.
Hamburger, Philip A.1989. "The Constitution's Accommodation of Social Change ." Michigan Law Review88: 239-327.
24.
Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay.1961. The Federalist Papers, intro. by Rossiter . New York: New American Library .
25.
Hobbes, Thomas, 1968. Leviathan, ed. C. B. Macpherson.Baltimore: Penguin Books.
26.
Horwill, Herbert W.1925. The Usages of the American Constitution. London: Oxford University Press.
27.
Hume, David.1948. Hume's Moral and Political Philosophy, ed. Henry D. Aiken.New York : Hafner.
28.
Jameson, John A.1887. A Treatise on Constitutional Conventions. 4th ed. Chicago: Callaghan .
29.
Jefferson, Thomas, 1964. Notes on the State of Virginia. New York: Harper & Row.
30.
Kammen, Michael.1987. A Machine That Would Go of Itself: The Constitution in American Culture. New York: Knopf .
31.
Kaufman, Barton, ed. 1969. Washington's Farewell Address: The View From the 20th Century. Chicago : Quadrangle Books.
32.
Kean, Thomas A.1986. "A Constitutional Convention Would Threaten Rights We Have Cherished for 200 Years." Detroit CollegeLaw Review4: 1087-91.
33.
Levinson, Sanford.1990. " 'Veneration' and Constitutional Change: James Madison Confronts the Possibility of Constitutional Amendments." Texas TechLaw Review21: 2442-61.
34.
_. 1991. "Accounting for Constitutional Change: (Or, How Many Times Has the United States Constitution Been Amended? (A) @ 26; (B) 26; (C) > 26; (D) All of the Above)." Constitutional Commentary8: 409-31.
35.
Levy, Leonard W.1988. Original Intent and the Framers' Constitution. New York: Macmillan.
36.
Locke, John.1963. Two Treatises ofGovernment , ed. Peter Laslett. New York : New American Library.
37.
Lutz, Donald S.1988. The Origins of American Constitutionalism. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
38.
Machiavelli, Niccolo.1883. Discourses on the First Decade of Titus Livius, trans. Ninian H. Thomson. London: Kegan Paul, Trench.
39.
_. 1964. The Prince, ed. Mark MusaNew York : St. Martin's Press.
40.
Maine, Henry S.1970. Ancient Law, ed. Frederick Pollock.Glouchester, MA: Peter Smith. First published in 1861.
41.
McCulloch v. Maryland. 4 Wheat 316 (1819).
42.
Markman, Stephen, 1989. "The Amendment Process of Article V: A Microcosm of the Constitution." Harvard Journal of Law &Public Policy12: 113-21.
43.
Mason, Alpheus T., and Donald G. Stephenson , Jr.1987. 8th ed. American Constitutional Law. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
44.
Miller, William L.1992. The Business of May Next. Charlottesville : University Press of Virginia.
45.
Morris, Richard B.1987. The Forging of the Union, 1781-1789. New York: Harper & Row.
46.
Murphy, Walter.1978. "The Art of Constitutional Interpretation: A Preliminary Showing." In M. Harmon, ed., Essays on the Constitution of the United States. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat.
47.
Olmstead, A.T.1948. History of the Persian Empire. Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press.
48.
Peck, Robert S.1992. The Bill of Rights & the Politics of Interpretation . St. Paul: West.
49.
Plutarch, 1951. Selected Lives and Essays. Rosolyn, NY: Walter J. Black.
50.
Price, Don K.1985. America's Unwritten Constitution. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
51.
Rosen, Jeff.1991. "Was the Flag Burning Amendment Unconstitutional? " Yale Law Journal100: 1073-92.
52.
Rousseau, Jean Jacques.1950. The Social Contract and Discourses, trans. G. D. H. Cole. New York: Dutton.
53.
Solberg, Winton U., ed. 1958. The Federal Convention and the Formation of the Union of the American States . New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
54.
Strauss, Leo, and Joseph Cropsey.1972. History of Political Philosophy, 2nd ed. Chicago: Rand McNally.
55.
Tiedeman, Christopher.1890. The Unwritten Constitution of the United States . New York: Putnam.
56.
Vile, John R.1985. "Limitations on the Constitutional Amending Process." ConstitutionalCommentary2: 373-88.
57.
_. 1991. Rewriting the Constitution: An Examination of Proposals From Reconstruction to the Present. New York: Praeger.
58.
_. 1992. The Constitutional Amending Process in American Political Thought. New York: Praeger.
