Although our understanding of voting in Senate elections has increased considerably over the past decade, the exclusive reliance on survey data has limited the range of questions we have explored. Using a less traditional design, the present study expands our understanding of vote choice in Senate elections. This study combines two methods-a content analysis and an experiment-to examine the impact that news coverage and candidate status have on voters views of Senate candidates. The results of this study suggest that both campaign coverage and the candidate's status favor incumbents. First, current patterns of campaign coverage encourage people to develop more favorable impressions of incumbents. Second, people use incumbency as a cue to draw distinctions between identical incumbents and challengers, and these distinctions always favor incumbents.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramowitz, Alan I.1981. "Choices and Echoes in the 1978 U.S. Senate Elections: A Research Note." American Journal of Political Science25: 112-18.
2.
—. 1988. "Explaining Senate Election Outcomes." American Political Science Review82: 385-404.
3.
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Jeffrey A. Segal .1986. "Determinants of the Outcomes of U.S. Senate Elections." Journal of Politics48: 433-39.
4.
Bartels, Larry M.1987. "Candidates Choice and the Dynamics of the Presidential Nominating Process." American Journal of Political Science31: 1-30.
5.
Brady, Henry, and Richard Johnston.1987. "What's the Primary Message: Horserace of Issue Journalism ." In G.R. Orren and N.W. Polsby, eds., Media and Momentum. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
6.
Campbell, Donald T., and Julian C. Stanley .1963. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
7.
Campbell, James E., and Joe A. Sumners.1990. "Presidential Coattails in Senate Elections ." American Political Science Review84: 513-24.
8.
Cantor, N., and W. Mischel.1979. "Prototypes in Person Perception." Advances in Experimental Social Psychology12:3-52.
9.
Clarke, P., and S.H. Evans.1983. Covering Campaigns: Journalism in Congressional Elections. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
Clarke, P., and E. Fredin.1978. "Newspapers, Television, and Political Reasoning." Public Opinion Quarterly42: 143-60.
11.
Cook, Timothy E.1989. Making Laws and Making News: Media Strategies in theU.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
12.
Graber, Doris A.1989. Mass Media and American Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
13.
—. 1972. "Personal Qualities in Presidential Images: The Contribution of the Press." Midwest Journal of Political Science16: 46-76.
14.
Goldenberg, Edie N., and Michael W. Traugott .1984. Campaigning for Congress . Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
15.
—. 1987. "Mass Media Effects in Recognizing and Rating Candidates in U.S. Senate Elections." In J. P. Vermeer , ed., Campaigns in the News: Mass Media and Congressional Elections. New York: Greenwood Press .
16.
Goldenberg, Edie N., Michael W. Traugott, and Kim F. Kahn.1988. "Voter Assessments of Presidential and Senatorial Candidates." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
17.
Hibbing, John R., and Sarah L. Brandes .1983. "State Population and the Electoral Success of U.S. Senators." American Journal of Political Science25: 423-39.
18.
Higgins, E.T., W.S. Rholes, and C.R. Jones.1977. "Category Accessibility and Impression Formation." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology13: 141-54.
19.
Hinckley, Barbara.1980. "House Reelections and Senate Defeats: The Role of the Challenger." British Journal of Political Science10: 441-60.
20.
Iyengar, Shanto.1991. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Doanld R. Kinder .1987. News That Matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
22.
Jacobson, Gary C.1987. The Politics of Congressional Elections. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
23.
Jacobson, Gary C., and Samuel Kernell.1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
24.
Kahn, Kim Fridkin.1991. "Senate Elections in the News: Examining Campaign Coverage ." Legislative Studies Quarterly16: 349-75.
25.
Kinder, Donald R.1980. "Presidential Prototypes." Political Behavior2: 315-37.
26.
—. 1983. "Presidential Traits." Pilot Study Report to the 1984 NES Planning Committee and NES Boards.
27.
Kinder, Donald R., Mark D. Peters, Robert P. Ableson, Susan T. Fisk.1980 "Presidential Prototypes." Political Behavior2: 315-35.
28.
Markus, Gregory B.1982. "Political Attitudes During an Election Year: A Report on the 1980 NES Panel Study." American Political Science Review73: 1055-70.
29.
Miller, Arthur H., Martin Wattenberg, and Oksana Malanchuk.1986. "Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates." American Political Science Review80: 421-540.
30.
Patterson, T.E.1980. The Mass Media Election. New York: Praeger.
31.
Rapoport, Robert B., Kelly L. Metcalf, and Jon A. Hartman.1989. "Candidate Traits and Voter Inferences: An Experimental Study." Journal of Politics51: 917-32.
32.
Robinson, Michael, and Margaret Sheehan .1983. Over the Wire and on TV: CBS and UPI in Campaign '80. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
33.
Schneider, David J., and Bonnie L. Blankmeyer .1983. "Prototype Salience and Implicit Personality Theories." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology44: 712-22.
34.
Squire, Peverill.1989. "Challengers in U.S. Senate Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly14: 531-47.
35.
Stein, Robert M.1990. "Economic Voting for Governor and U.S. Senator: The Electoral Consequences of Federalism." Journal of Politics52: 29-53.
36.
Stewart, Charles.1989. "A Sequential Model of U.S. Senate Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly14: 567-601.
37.
Westlye, Mark C.1991. Senate Elections and Campaign Intensity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38.
Whitby, Kenny J., and Timothy Bledsoe.1986. "The Impact of Policy Voting on the Electoral Fortunes of Senate Incumbents." Western Political Quarterly39: 690-700.
39.
Wright, Gerald C., Jr. , and Mark B. Berkman.1986. "Candidates and Policy in U.S. Senate Elections." American Political Science Review80: 567-90.
