Using a production function model, this paper examines Olson's thesis that political organization contributes to economic decline. The findings confirm that political organizations have a slight negative influence on state income growth rates. However, other variables account for almost 80 percent of the variation across states. This analysis points to the importance of capital markets and business and occupational interests and the utility of the production function approach for explaining growth.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Becker, Gary S.1983. "A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence." Quarterly Journal of Economics98: 371-400.
2.
Bhagwati, Jagdish N.1980. "Lobbying and Welfare." Journal of Public Economics14: 355-63.
3.
Brace, Paul.1989. "Isolating the Economies of the States." American Politics Quarterly17: 256-76.
4.
_. 1991. "The Changing Context of State Political Economy." Journal of Politics53 (2): 297-317.
5.
Brace, Paul, and Philip Baumann.1986. "Markets Versus the Polity: The Politics of State Economic Growth."Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Meetings, April, Chicago, IL.
6.
Brace, Paul, and Youssef Cohen.1989. "How Much Do Interest Groups Influence State Economic Growth?" American Political Science Review83: 1287-1301.
7.
Christensen, Lauritis R., Dale W. Jorgenson, and Lawrence J. Lau .1972. "Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers."Review of Economic and Statistics28-45.
8.
Denison, E.F.1985. Trends in American Economic Growth, 1929-1982. Washington, DC: Brookings.
9.
Dornbusch, Rudiger, and Stanley Fischer .1987. Macroeconomics, 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
10.
Dye, Thomas R.1966. Politics, Economics, and the Public. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
11.
_. 1980. "Taxing, Spending and Economic Growth in American States ." Journal of Politics42: 1085-1107.
12.
Garand, James C.1992. "Changing Patterns of Relative State Economic Growth Over Time: Limitations on Cross-Sectional Tests of Olson's Thesis." Western Political Quarterly45: 469-83.
13.
Gray, Virginia, and David Lowery.1988. "Interest Group Politics and Economic Growth in the United States." American Political Science Review82: 109-31.
14.
Jackman, Robert.1986. "The Politics of Economic Growth in the Industrial Democracies, 1974-1980: Leftist Strength or North Sea Oil?" Journal of Politics49: 202-12.
15.
Kim, H. Youn.1988. "Analyzing the Indirect Production Function for U.S. Manufacturing ." Southern Economic Journal55: 494-504.
16.
Lange, Peter, and Geoffrey Garrett.1987. "The Politics of Growth Reconsidered." Journal of Politics49: 257-74.
17.
Mueller, Dennis C.1983. "The Political Economy of Growth and Redistribution ." In The Political Economy of Growth, ch. 13, 261-76. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18.
Olson, Mancur.1982a. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Economic Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
_. 1982b. "Stagflation and the Political Economy of the Decline in Productivity."American Economic Review72: 143-48.
20.
_. 1983. "The South Will Fall Again: The South as Leader and Laggard in Economic Growth."Southern Economic Journal49: 917-32.
21.
_. 1984. "Beyond Keynesianism and Monetarism." Economic Inquiry22: 297-322.
22.
_. 1986. "A Theory of the Incentives Facing Political Organizations: Neo-Corporatism and the Hegemonic State."International Political Science Review72: 165-89.
23.
Solow, Robert.1957. "Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function ." Review of Economics and Statistics39: 312-20.
24.
Tinbergen, Jan, and Hendricus C. Bos .1985. Mathematical Models of Economic Growth. Economics Handbooks Series. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25.
Walters, A.A.1963. "Production and Cost Functions: An Econometric Survey ." Econometrica31: 1-52.
