As part of a larger effort to develop an independent system-level theory of interest groups, we explore the system-level trait of interest group diversity. A model of state interest group diversity is developed and tested with state data from the early 1980s. We find that interest group diversity is related to economic diversity and economic size, whereas its relation to wealth and to the number of interest groups contrasts sharply with much of our conventional wisdom about state interest groups. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding state interest group politics and outline how they contribute to a larger research program on state interest group systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bowman, Ann O'M., and Richard C. Kearney .1986. The Resurgence of the States . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
2.
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Virginia Gray.1983. Feminism and the New Right. New York : Praeger.
3.
Hansen, John Mark. 1985 "The Political Economy of Group Membership ." American Political Science Review79 (1): 79-96.
4.
Hunter, Kennith G., Laura Ann Wilson, and Gregory G. Brunk .1991. "Societal Complexity and Interest-Group Lobbying in the American States." Journal of Politics53 (2): 488-503.
5.
Laumann, Edward O., and David Knoke.1987. The Organizational State. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
6.
Lowery, David, and Virginia Gray.1992. "The Density of State Interest Group Systems." Journal of Politics54 (4).
7.
Moe, Terry M.1980. The Organization of Interests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Morehouse, Sarah McCally.1981. State Politics, Parties, and PolicyNew York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
9.
Olson, Mancur.1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
—. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11.
Paolino, Robert Alan.1991. "A Comparative Analysis of Interest Group Representation in the Fifty States." MA thesis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
12.
Renshaw, Vernon, Edward A. Trott, Jr., and Howard L. Friedenberg.1988. "Gross State Product by Industry, 1963-86." Survey of Current Business68 (5): 30-45.
13.
Salisbury, Robert H.1969. "An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups." Midwest Journal of Political Science13 (1): 1-32.
14.
Schattschneider, E.E.1960. The Semisovereign People. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
15.
Schlozman, Kay Lehman.1984. "What Accent the Heavenly Chorus? Political Equality and the American Pressure System." Journal of Politics46 (4): 1006-32.
16.
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and John T. Tierney .1983. "More of the Same: Washington Pressure Group Activity in a Decade of Change." Journal of Politics45 (2): 351-77.
17.
—. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
18.
Thomas, Clive S., and Ronald J. Hrebenar .1990. "Interest Groups in the States ." In Virginia Gray, Herbert Jacob, and Robert Albritton, eds., Politics in the American States, 5th ed., pp. 123-58. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
19.
Truman, David B.1951. The Governmental Process. New York : Knopf.
20.
Walker, Jack L.1983. "The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America ." American Political Science Review. 77 (2): 390-406.
21.
Zeigler, L. Harmon.1983. "Interest Groups in the States." In Virginia Gray, Herbert Jacob , and Kenneth Vines, eds., Politics in the American States, 4th ed., pp. 97-132. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
22.
Zeigler, L. Harmon, and Hendrik van Dalen .1976. "Interest Groups in State Politics." In Herbert Jacob and Kenneth Vines, eds., Politics in the American States, 3rd ed., pp. 93-136. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
