What affects Americans knowledge of the partisan makeup of the House of Representatives? Using National Election Studies from 1960 to 1984, we find that two sets of factors help explain what people know about party control of the lower chamber of the national legislature. The first reflects personal variables usually used to account for levels of political knowledge: education, gender, race, strength of partisanship, political interest, and media dependence. The second set includes contextual factors of U.S. politics, including divided party control of national elective institutions, divided control of the legislature itself, and whether elections change party control of the presidency. Contextual factors' importance as predictors of information show they merit closer study in future attempts to understand the dynamics of political information.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bennett, Linda L.M., and Stephen Earl Bennett .1989. "Enduring Gender Differences in Political Interest." American Politics Quarterly17 (January): 105-22.
2.
—. 1992. "I Voted for Old What's His Name: The Impact of Information on the Electoral Bases of Divided Government." Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association's Annual Meeting , Chicago, IL, April 9-11.
3.
Bennett, Stephen Earl.1988. " 'Know Nothings' Revisited: The Meaning of Political Ignorance Today." Social Science Quarterly69 (June): 476-90.
4.
—. 1989. "Trends in Americans' Political Information, 1967-1987 ." American Political Quarterly17 (October): 422-35.
5.
—. 1992. "The Persian Gulf War's Impact on Americans' Political Information." Paper presented at the National Election Studies' Conference on the Political Consequences of War, Washington, DC, February 28.
6.
Borgatta, Edgar F., and George W. Bohrnstedt .1981. "Level of Measurement: Once Over Again." In George F. Bohrnstedt and Edgar F. Borgatta, eds., Social Measurement: Current Issues, pp. 23-37. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
Born, Richard.1990. "The Shared Fortunes of Congress and Congressmen: Members May Run from Congress, but They Can't Hide." Journal of Politics52 (November): 1223-41.
8.
Caldeira, Gregory A., and Samuel C. Patterson .1982. "Contextual Influences on Participation in U.S. State Legislative Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly7 (May): 359-81.
9.
Clarke, Peter, and Susan H. Evans.1983. Covering Campaigns: Journalism in Congressional Elections. Stanford, CA: Stanford Unviersity Press.
10.
Cohen, Jacob, and Patricia Cohen.1983. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2d ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
11.
Converse, Philip E.1975. "Public Opinion and Voting Behavior." In Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby, eds., Handbook of Political Science, 4: 75-169. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
12.
—, with Richard G. Niemi .1971. "Non-voting among Young Adults in the United States." In William J. Crotty , Donald M. Freeman, and Douglas S. Gatlin, eds., Political Parties and Political Behavior, 2d ed., pp. 443-66. Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
13.
Fenno, Richard F., Jr. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts . Boston: Little, Brown.
14.
Fiorina, Morris.1988. "The Reagan Years: Turning to the Right or Groping Toward the Middle?" In Barry Cooper, Allan Kornberg , and William Mishler, eds., The Resurgence of Conservatism in Anglo-American Democracies , pp. 430-59. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
15.
—. 1992. Divided Government. New York: Macmillan.
16.
Goldenberg, Edie N., and Michael W. Traugott .1980. "Congressional Campaign Effects on Candidate Recognition and Evaluation." Political Behavior2 (2): 61-90.
17.
—. 1987. "Mass Media in U.S. Congressional Elections." Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12 (May): 317-39.
18.
Graber, Doris.1989. Mass Media and American Politics, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: C. Q. Press.
19.
Hurley, Patricia A., and Kim Quaile Hill .1980. "The Prospects for Issue Voting in Contemporary Congressional Elections." American Politics Quarterly8 (October): 425-48.
20.
Jacobson, Gary C.1990. The Electoral Origins of Divided Government: Competition in U.S. House Elections, 1946-1988. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
21.
—. 1991. "The Persistence of Democratic House Majorities ." In Gary W. Cox and Samuel Kernell, eds., The Politics of Divided Government , pp. 57-84. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
22.
Ladd, Everett Carll.1990. "Public Opinion and the 'Congress Problem' " The Public Interest100 (Summer): 57-67.
23.
Luskin, Robert C.1990. "Explaining Political Sophistication." Political Behavior12 (December): 331-61.
24.
Mann, Thomas E.1978. Unsafe at Any Margin: Interpreting Congressional Elections . Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
25.
Mann, Thomas E., and Raymond E. Wolfinger .1980. "Candidates and Parties in Congressional Elections." American Political Science Review74 (September): 617-32.
26.
Miller, Warren E., and Donald E. Stokes .1966. "Constituency Influence in Congress." In Angus Campbell, et al., Elections and the Political Order, pp. 351-72. New York: Wiley.
27.
Neuman, W. Russell.1986. The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Papadopoulos, loannis.1988. "The Swiss Election of 1987: A 'Silent Revolution' behind Stability?" Western European Politics11 (July): 146-49.
29.
Petrocik, John R.1991. "Divided Government: Is It All in the Campaigns ?" In Gary W. Cox and Samuel Kernel, eds., The Politics of Divided Government , pp. 13-38. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
30.
Powell, Lynda W.1989. "Analyzing Misinformation: Perceptions of Congressional Candidates' Ideologies." American Journal of Political Science33 (May): 272-93.
31.
Robinson, Michael J., and Margaret A. Sheehan .1983. Over the Wire and On TV: CBS and UPI in Campaign '80. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
32.
Shafer, Byron E.1989. "The Election of 1988 and the Structure of American Politics: Thoughts on Interpreting an Electoral Order." Electoral Studies8 (March): 5-21.
33.
Smith, Eric R. A. N.1989. The Unchanging American Voter. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34.
Sundquist, James L.1988-89. "The New Era of Coalition Government in the United States." Political Science Quarterly103 (Winter): 613-35.
35.
Zaller, John.1985. "Pre-testing Information Items on the 1986 NES Pilot Study ," Mimeographed.
