Berelson, B., P. Lazarsfeld, and W. McPhee.1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential CampaignChicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Conover, P., and S. Feldman.1982. "Projection and the Perception of Candidates' Issue Positions." Western Political Quarterly35 (June): 228-44.
3.
Converse, P.1966. "The Problem of Party Distances in Models of Voting Change ." In K. Jennings and H. Zeigler, eds., The Electoral Process, pp. 175-207. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
Downs, A.1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
5.
Eiser, R.1986. Social Psychology: Attitudes, Cognition and Social Behaviour . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Eiser, R., and J. van der Pligt .1984. "Accentuation Theory, Polarization, and the Judgment of Attitude Statements. In R. Eiser, ed., Attitudinal Judgment, pp. 43-63. New York: Springer.
7.
Enelow, J., and M. Hinich.1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Granberg, D.1982. "Social Judgment Theory." In M. Burgoon, ed., Communications Yearbook, Vol. 6, pp. 304-29. Beverly Hills: Sage .
9.
—. 1987. "A Contextual Effect in Political Perception and Self-Placement on an Ideology Scale: Comparative Analyses of Sweden and the U.S." Scandinavian Political Studies10 (No. 1): 39-60.
10.
—. 1991. "Political Perception." In S. Iyengar and W. McGuire, eds., Current Approaches to Political Psychology. Durham, NC : Duke University Press.
11.
Granberg, D., and E. Brent.1974. "Dove-Hawk Placements in the 1968 Election: Application of Social Judgment and Balance Theories." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology29 (May): 687-95.
12.
Granberg, D., and T. Brown.1989. "On Affect and Cognition in Politics ." Social Psychology Quarterly52 (September): 171-82.
13.
Granberg, D., and S. Holmberg.1986. "Political Perception in Sweden and the U.S.: Analyses of Issues with Explicit Alternatives." Western Political Quarterly39 (March): 7-28.
14.
—. 1988. The Political System Matters: Social Psychology and Voting Behavior in Sweden and the United States. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Granberg, D., J. Kasmer, and T. Nanneman.1988. "An Empirical Examination of Two Theories of Political Perception." Western Political Quarterly41 (March): 29-46.
16.
Granberg, D., and J. Seidel.1976. "Social Judgments of the Urban and Vietnam Issues in 1968 and 1972." Social Forces55 (September): 1-15.
17.
Heider, F.1946. "Attitudes and Cognitive Organization." Journal of Psychology21: 107-12.
18.
—. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: Wiley.
19.
Hinich, M.J. and M. Munger.1990. "A Spatial Theory of Voting."Working paper 136, Duke University Program in Political Economy .
20.
Holmberg, S.1981. Svenska Väljare. Stockholm: Liber.
21.
—. 1989. "Political Representation in Sweden."Scandinavian Political Studies12 (No. 1): 1-36.
22.
Judd, C., and J. Johnson.1981. "Attitudes, Polarization, and Diagnosticity ." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology41 (July): 26-36.
23.
Kinder, D.1978. "Political Person Perception: The Asymmetrical Influence of Sentiment and Choice on Perceptions of Presidential Candidates ." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology36 (August): 859-71.
24.
King, M.1978. "Assimilation and Contrast of Presidential Candidates' Issue Positions." Public Opinion Quarterly41 (Winter): 515-22.
25.
Krosnick, J.1988. "The Role of Attitude Importance in Social Evaluation: A Study of Policy Preferences, Presidential Candidate Evaluations, and Voting Behavior." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology55 (August): 196-210.
26.
Lund, T.1974. "Multidimensional Scaling of Political Parties. A Methodological Study."Scandinavian Journal of Psychology15 (No. 2): 108-18.
27.
Luttbeg, N., and M. Gant.1985. "The Failure of Liberal-Conservative Ideology as a Cognitive Structure." Public Opinion Quarterly49 (Spring): 80-93.
28.
Markus, G., and P. Converse.1979. "A Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice." American Political Science Review73 (December): 1055-70.
29.
Martinez, M.1988. "Political Involvement and the Projection Process ." Political Behavior10 (No. 2): 151-67.
30.
McGrath, J., and M. McGrath.1962. "Effects of Partisanship on Perceptions of Political Figures."Public Opinion Quarterly26 (Summer): 236-48.
31.
McGuire, W.1983. "A Contextual Theory of Knowledge: Its Implications for Innovations and Reform in Psychology Research." In L. Berkowitz, ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , Vol. 16, pp. 1-47. New York : Academic Press.
32.
Miller, A., W. Miller, A. Raine, and T. Brown.1976. "A Majority Party in Disarray: Policy Polarization in the 1972 Election."American Political Science Review70 (September): 753-78.
33.
Nimmo, D., and R. Savage.1976. Candidates and Their Images: Concepts, Methods, and Findings. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear.
34.
Ottati, V., M. Fishbein, and S. Middlestadt.1988. "Determinants of Voters' Beliefs about the Candidates' Stands on the Issues: The Role of Evaluative Bias Heuristics and the Candidates' Expressed Message." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology55 (October): 517-29.
35.
Page, B., and R. Brody.1972. "Policy Voting and the Electoral Process: The Vietnam Issue." American Political Science Review66 (September): 979-95.
36.
Petrocik, J.1981. Party Coalitions: Realignments and the Decline of the New Deal Party System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
—. 1989. "Realignment: New Party Coalitions and the Nationalization of the South."Journal of Politics49 (May): 347-75.
38.
Rabinowitz, G.1973. Spatial Models of Electoral Choice: An Empirical Choice: An Empirical Analysis. Chapel Hill, NC: Institute for Research in Social Science.
39.
—, and S. MacDonald. 1989. "A Directional Theory of Issue Voting." American Political Science Review83 (March): 93-121.
40.
—, J. Prothro, and W. Jacoby.1982. "Salience as a Factor in the Impact of Issues on Candidate Evaluation."Journal of Politics44 (February): 41-63.
41.
Ross, L.1977. "The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process." In L. Berkowitz , ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , Vol. 10, pp. 173-220, New York: Academic Press.
42.
Sherif, M. and C. Hovland.1961. Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change. New Haven : Yale University Press.
43.
Sherman, R., and L. Ross.1972. "Liberalism-Conservatism and Dimensional Salience in the Perception of Political Figures." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology23 (July): 120-27.
44.
Sherrod, D.1972. "Selective Perception of Political Candidates." Public Opinion Quarterly35 (Winter): 554-62.
45.
Sigel, R.1964. "Effect of Partisanship on the Perception of Political Candidates." Public Opinion Quarterly28 (Fall): 483-96.
46.
van der Eijk, C., G. Irwin, and K. Niemöller.1986. "The Dutch Parliamentary Election of May, 1986."Electoral Studies5 (December): 289-96.
47.
Whittaker, J.1967. "Perception and Judgment in the Political Extremist ." Journal of Communication17 (June): 136-41.
48.
Wright, J., and R. Niemi.1983. "Perceptions of Candidates' Issue Positions ." Political Behavior5 (No. 2): 209-23.