Caldiera, Gregory A., and John R. Wright.1988. "Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court." American Political Science Review82: 1109-27.
2.
Canon, Bradley C., and Michael Giles.1972. "Recurring Litigants: Federal Agencies Before the Supreme Court." Western Political Quarterly25: 183-91.
3.
Crowley, Donald W.1987. "Judicial Review of Administrative Agencies: Does the Type of Agency Matter?" Western Political Quarterly31: 265-83.
4.
Davis, Kenneth.1977. Administrative Law. St. Paul : West Publishing Co.
5.
Fiorino, Daniel J.1976. "Judicial Administrative Interaction in Regulatory Policy Making: The Case of the Federal Power Commission." Administrative Law Review28.
6.
Gellhorn, Walter, et al. 1979. Administrative Law. New York: Foundation Press.
7.
Handberg, Roger.1979. "The Supreme Court and Administrative Agencies: 1965-1978 ." Journal of Contemporary Law6: 161-76.
8.
O'Connor, Karen, and Lee Epstein.1983. "The Rise of Conservative Interest Group Litigation." Journal of Politics45: 479-89.
9.
Pritchett, Herman.1948. The Roosevelt Court: A Study In Judicial Politics and Values 1937-1947. New York: MacMillan .
10.
Rathjen, Gregory J., and Harold Spaeth.1979. "Access to the Federal Courts: An Analysis of Burger Court Policy Making." American Journal of Political Science23: 360-82.
11.
Ripley, Randall B., and Grace Franklin.1984. Congress. The Bureaucracy and Public Policy. 3rd ed. Homewood, IL : Dorsey Press.
12.
Segal, Jeffrey A.1988. "Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General During the Warren and Burger Courts." Western Political Quarterly41: 135-44.
13.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Cheryl D. Reedy .1988. "The Supreme Court and Sex Discrimination: The Role of the Solicitor General." Western Political Quarterly41: 553-68.
14.
Shapiro, Martin. 1964. Law and Politics In the Supreme Court. New York : Free Press.
15.
—. 1968. The Supreme Court and Administrative AgenciesNew York: Free Press.
16.
—. 1988. Who Guards The Guardians? Athens, GA : University of Georgia Press.
17.
Sheehan, Reginald S., and Donald R. Songer .1989. "Supreme Court Litigation: An Analysis of Direct Parties Before the Court, 1953-1988." Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association.
18.
Spaeth, Harold J., and Stuart Teger.1982. "Activism and Restraint: A Cloak for the Justices' Policy Preferences." In Halpern and Lamb, eds., Supreme Court Activism and Restraint , pp. 277-302. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
19.
Tanenhaus, Joseph.1960. "Supreme Court Attitudes toward Federal Administrative Agencies." Journal of Politics22: 502-24.
20.
Ulmer, Sydney.1978. "Selecting Cases for Supreme Court Review: An Underdog Model." American Political Science Review72: 902-10.
21.
—. 1981. "Selecting Cases for Supreme Court Review: Litigant Status in the Warren and burger Courts." In Sydney Ulmer, ed., Courts, Law, and Judicial Processes. New York: Free Press.
22.
Ulmer, Sydney, and Michael Thomson .1981. "Supreme Court Support for Black Litigants: A Comparison of the Warren and Burger Courts." In Sydney, Ulmer, ed., Courts, Law, and Judicial Processes. New York: Free Press .
23.
Ulmer, Sydney, and David Willison.1985. "The Solicitor General of the United States as Amicus Curiae in the U.S. Supreme Court, 1969-1983 Terms." Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.
