Atkins, B., and W. Taggart.1982. "Substantive Access Doctrine and Conflict Management in the United States Supreme Court: Reflections on Activism and Restraint." In Supreme Court Activism and Restraint, eds. J. Halpern and C. Lamb, pp. 351-83. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
2.
Baum, L.1977. "Policy Goals in Judicial Gatekeeping: A Proximity Model of Discretionary Jurisdiction." American Journal of Political Science21 (February): 13-35.
3.
Berger, R.1969. "Standing to Sue in Public Actions." Yale Law Review78 (March): 816-40.
4.
Davis, K.1970. "The Liberalized Law of Standing." University of Chicago Law Review37 (Spring): 450-73.
5.
Hoffman, M., and J. McCutchen.1976. "Comment: Standing to Sue in Federal Courts, The Elimination of Preliminary Threshold Standing Inquiries." Tulane Law Review51 (December): 119-39.
6.
Mendelson, W.1976. "Mr. Justice Douglas and Government by the Judiciary ." Journal of Politics38 (November): 918-37.
7.
Orren, K.1976. "Standing to Sue: Interest Group Conflict in the Federal Courts." American Political Science Review70 (September): 723-41.
8.
Provine, D.1980. Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
Rathjen, G., and H. Spaeth.1979. "Access to the Federal Courts: An Analysis of Burger Court Policy Making." American Journal of Political Science23 (May): 360-82.
10.
_. 1983. "Denial of Access and Ideological Preferences: An Analysis of the Voting Behavior of the Burger Court Justices, 1969-1976." Western Political Quarterly36 (March): 71-87.
11.
Scharpf, F.1966. "Judicial Review and the Political Question: A Functional Analysis." Yale Law Review75 (March): 517-97.
12.
Schubert, G.1974. The Judicial Mind Revisited. New York : Oxford University Press.
13.
Scott, K.1973. "Standing in the Supreme Court: A Functional Analysis ." Harvard Law Review86 (February): 645-92.
14.
Tanenhaus, J., et al., (1963). "The Supreme Court's Certiorari Jurisdiction: Cue Theory." In Judicial Decision Making, ed. G. Schubert, pp. 111-32. Glencoe: Free Press.
15.
Teger, S., and D. Kosinski.1980. "The Cue Theory of Supreme Court Certiorari Jurisdiction: A Reconsideration." Journal of Politics42 (November): 834-46.
16.
Ulmer, S.1972. "The Decision to Grant Certiorari as an Indicator of 'Decision on the Merits'." Polity4 (Summer): 429-47.
17.
_. 1978. "Selecting Cases for Supreme Court Review: An Underdog Model." American Political Science Review72 (September): 902-10.
18.
Ulmer, S., et al. 1972. "The Decision to Grant or Deny Certiorari: Further Considerations of Cue Theory." Law and Society Review6 (May): 637-43.
19.
Wasby, S.1976. Continuity and Change: From the Warren Court to the Burger Court. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear .