Abramowitz, Alan I.1975. "Name Familiarity, Reputation and the Incumbency Effect in a Congressional Election." Western Political Quarterly28 (December): 668-84.
2.
Alford, John R., and John R. Hibbing .1981. "Increased Incumbency Advantage in the House." Journal of Politics43 (November): 1042-61.
3.
Bullock, Charles S.1972. "Freshman Committee Assignments and Re-election in the United States House of Representatives." American Political Science Review66 (September).
4.
Campbell, James E.1982. "Cosponsoring Legislation in the U. S. Congress." Legislative Studies Quarterly7 (April).
5.
Collie, Melissa P.1981. "Incumbency, Electoral Safety, and Turnover in the House of Representatives, 1952-1976." American Political Science Review75 (March): 119-31.
6.
Cover, Albert D.1977 "One Good Term Deserves Another: The Advantage of Political Incumbency in Congressional Elections." American Journal of Political Science21 (August): 523-41.
7.
Cranor, John D., and Joseph W. Westphal .1978. "Congressional District Offices, Federal Programs and Electoral Benefits: Some Observations on the Passing of the Marginal Representative, 1974-76." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association .
8.
Erikson, Robert S.1971. "The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections ." Polity4 (Spring): 395-405.
9.
_. 1972. "Malapportionment, Gerrymandering, and Party Fortunes in Congressional Elections."American Political Science Review66 (December): 1234-45.
10.
Ferejohn, John A.1977. "On the Decline of Competition in Congressional Elections ." American Political Science Review71 (March): 166-76.
11.
Fiorina, Morris P.1977. "The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did It." American Political Science Review71 (March 1977): 177-81.
12.
_. 1981. "Some Problems in Studying the Effects of Resource Allocation in Congressional Elections." American Journal of Political Science25 (August) 543-67.
13.
Fowler, Linda L., Scott R. Douglass, and Wesley D. Clark , Jr. 1980. "The Electoral Effects of House Committee Assignments." Journal of Politics42 (February): 307-19.
14.
Jacobson, Gary C.1980. Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15.
Jacobson, Gary C., and Samuel Kernell.1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
16.
Johannes, John R., and John C. McAdams .1981. "The Congressional Incumbency Effect: Is it Casework, Policy Compatibility, or Something Else? An Examination of the 1978 Election." American Journal of Political Science25 (August): 512-42.
17.
Kostroski, Warren.1973. "Party and Incumbency in Postwar Senate Elections. American Political Science Review67 (December) 1213-34.
18.
Mann, Thomas E.1978. Unsafe at Any Margin: Interpreting Congressional Elections . Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.
19.
Mann, Thomas E., and Raymond E. Wolfinger .1980. "Candidates and Parties in Congressional Elections. American Political Science Review74 (September): 617-32.
20.
Mayhew, David R.1974. "Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals ." Polity7 (Spring) 295-317.
21.
_. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
22.
Nelson, Candice J.1978/1979. "The Effect of Incumbency on Voting in Congressional Elections, 1964-1974." Political Science Quarterly93 (Winter): 665-78.
23.
Parker, Glenn R.1980. "The Advantage of Incumbency in House Elections." American Politics Quarterly8 (October): 449-64.
24.
Parker, Glenn R.1980a. "Cycles in Congressional District Attention." Journal of Politics42 (May): 540-48.
25.
Stokes, Donald E., and Warren E. Miller .1966. "Party Government and the Salience of Congress." In A. Campbell et al., Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley.
26.
Yiannakis, Diana Evans.1981. "The Grateful Electorate: Casework and Congressional Elections ." American Journal of Political Science25 (August): 568-80.