Voters are often at a disadvantage in assessing policies when possessing limited information. Although party identification has long served as an important heuristic to inform preferences, there is support for the notion that party attachment may amplify race and gender stereotypes about elected officials. In this paper, we evaluate how race and gender might also condition attitudes towards elected officials by serving as indicators of a politician’s ideology. Using foreign policy positions as a “low-information” environment in which respondents should be more susceptible to cues, we find that some partisans rate support for policy statements lower when they are attributed to politicians from the opposite party. More importantly, this effect is further conditioned by race and gender cues as a function of a respondent’s ideology.
AnsolabehereStephenStewartCharlesIII. 2009. “State of the Nation: How Post-Racial was Obama’s Victory.” Boston Review34 (1): 6.
2.
AveryJames M.2007. “Race, Partisanship, and Political Trust Following Bush Versus Gore (2000).” Political Behavior29: 327–42.
3.
BailensonJeremy N.IyengarShantoYeeNickCollinsNathan A.. 2008. “Facial Similarity Between Voters and Candidates Causes Influence.” Public Opinion Quarterly72 (5): 935–61.
4.
BashevkinSylvia B.2018. Women as Foreign Policy Leaders: National Security and Gender Politics in Superpower America. Oxford University Press.
5.
BendixWilliamJeongGyu-Ho. 2020. “Gender and Foreign Policy: Are Female Members of Congress More Dovish than their Male Colleagues?” Political Research Quarterly73 (1): 126–40.
6.
BerinskyAdam J.de Benedictis-KessnerJacobGoldbergMatthew E.MargolisMichele F.. 2020. “The Effect of Associative Racial Cues in Elections.” Political Communication37 (4): 512–29.
7.
BozentkaAlexander. 2020. The Role of Ideological Cues and Party Politics in Foreign Policy Public Opinion Formation. Unpublished undergraduate honors thesis. Virginia Military Institute.
8.
BraderTedValentinoNicholas A.SuhayElizabeth. 2008. “What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration?” American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 959–78.
9.
BullockJohn G.2011. “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” American Political Science Review105 (3): 496–515.
10.
CampbellAngusConversePhilip E.MillerWarren E.StokesDonald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Wiley.
11.
CarseyThomas M.LaymanGeoffrey C.. 2006. “Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science50 (2): 464–77.
12.
CohenGeoffrey. 2003. “Party over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology85 (November): 808–822.
13.
CoppockAlexander. 2019. “Generalizing from Survey Experiments Conducted on Mechanical Turk: A Replication Approach.” Political Science Research and Methods7 (3): 613–628.
14.
Crowder-MeyerMelodyGadarianShana KushnerTrounstineJessicaVueKelsey. 2020. “A Different Kind of Disadvantage: Candidate Race, Cognitive Complexity, and Voter Choice.” Political Behavior42: 509–30.
15.
DitontoTessa. 2020. “The Mediating Role of Information Search in the Relationship Between Prejudice and Voting Behavior.” Political Psychology41 (1): 71–88.
16.
DittmarKellyKiraSanbonmatsuKellyCarroll. et al.2018. A Seat at the Table: Congresswomen’s Perspectives on Why Their Presence Matters. Oxford University Press.
17.
EhrenbergJohn. 2022. White Nationalism and the Republican Party: Toward Minority Rule in America. Routledge.
18.
EichenbergRichard C.2003. “Gender Differences in Public Attitudes Toward the Use of Force by the United States, 1990-2003.” International Security28 (1): 110–41.
19.
ElderLaurel. 2021. The Partisan Gap: Why Democratic Women Get Elected but Republican Women Don’t. New York University Press.
20.
GartnerScott SigmundSeguraGary M.. 2000. “Race, Casualties, and Opinion in the Vietnam War.” The Journal of Politics62 (1): 115–46.
21.
GerberAlan S.HuberGregory A.WashingtonEbonya. 2010. “Party Affiliation, Partisanship, and Political Beliefs: a Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review104 (4): 720–44.
22.
GriffinJohn D.FlavinPatrick. 2007. “Racial Differences in Information, Expectations, and Accountability.” The Journal of Politics69 (1): 220–36.
23.
GrossmannMattHopkinsDavid A.. 2016. Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Group-Interest Democrats. Oxford University Press.
24.
Haider-MarkelDonald P.VieuxAndrea. 2008. “Gender and Conditional Support for Torture in the War on Terror.” Politics and Gender4 (1): 5–33.
25.
HightonBenjamin. 2009. “Revisiting the Relationship Between Educational Attainment and Political Sophistication.” The Journal of Politics71 (4): 1564–76.
26.
HolmanMirya R.MerollaJennifer L.ZechmeisterElizabeth J.. 2016. “Terrorist Threat, Male Stereotypes, and Candidate Evaluations.” Political Research Quarterly69, no. 1 (March): 134–47.
27.
HolmanMirya R.MerollaJennifer L.ZechmeisterElizabeth J.WangDing. 2019. “Terrorism, Gender, and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election.” Electoral Studies61: 102–33.
28.
HutchingsVincent L.ValentinoNicholas A.. 2004. “The Centrality of Race in American Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science7: 383–408.
29.
JacobsmeierMatthew L.2015. “From Black and White to Left and Right: Race, Perceptions of Candidates’ Ideologies, and Voting Behavior in U.S. House Elections.” Political Behavior37: 595–621.
30.
JacobyWilliam G.1988. “The Impact of Party Identification on Issue Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science32 (3): 643–61.
31.
KanthakKristinKrauseGeorge A.. 2012. The Diversity Paradox: Political Parties, Legislatures, and the Organizational Foundations of Representation in America. Oxford University Press.
32.
KarlKatherine L.RyanTimothy J.. 2016. “When are Stereotypes About Black Candidates Applied? An Experimental Test.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics1 (2): 253–79.
33.
KaufmannKaren M.PetrocikJohn R.. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.” American Journal of Political Science43, no. 3 (July): 864–87.
34.
KnollBenjamin R.BakerMatthew. 2021. “Politics at the Pulpit: Elite Religious Cues and Immigration Attitudes.” Commonwealth Review of Political Science5 (1); 6.
35.
KnollBenjamin R.RedlawskDavid P.HowardSanborn. 2011. “Framing Labels and Immigration Policy Attitudes in the Iowa Caucuses: ‘Trying to Out-Tancredo Tancredo.” Political Behavior33 (3): 433–54.
36.
KnollBenjamin R.RedlawskDavid P.HowardSanborn. 2014. “Response to ‘Framing Unauthorized Immigrants: the Effects of Labels on Evaluations.” Psychological Reports115 (3): 913–7.
37.
LauRichard R.RedlawskDavid P.. 2001. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science45 (4): 951–71.
38.
LermanAmy E.SadinMeredith L.. 2016. “Stereotyping or Projection? How White and Black Voters Estimate Black Candidates’ Ideology.” Political Psychology37 (2): 147–63.
39.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.CharlesTienNadeauRichard. 2010. “Obama’s Missed Landslide: a Racial Cost?” PS: Political Science & Politics43 (1): 69–76.
40.
LiebermanRobert C.SchlozmanDaniel. 2024. “Democratic Backsliding and Ethnic Politics: the Republican Party in the United States.” Comparative Political Studies; Advance online publication.
41.
LizotteMary-Kate. 2022. “Public Opinion and Gender.” In Handbook on Politics and Public Opinion, edited by RudolphThomas J., 193–207. Edward Elgar Publishing.
42.
McDermottMonika L.1998. “Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections.” Political Research Quarterly51 (4): 895–918.
43.
MullinixKevin J.LeeperThomas J.DruckmanJames N.FreeseJeremy. 2015. “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science2 (2): 109–38.
44.
PistonSpencerKrupnikovYannaMilitaKaitlinRyanJohn Barry. 2018. “Clear as Black and White: the Effects of Ambiguous Rhetoric Depend on Candidate Race.” The Journal of Politics80 (2): 662–74.
45.
ReevesKeith. 1997. Voting Hopes or Fears? White Voters, Black Candidates, and Racial Politics in America. Oxford University Press.
46.
SanbonmatsuKira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science46 (1): 20–34.
47.
SanbonmatsuKira. 2003. “Political Knowledge and Gender Stereotypes.” American Politics Research31 (6): 575–94.
48.
SanbonmatsuKiraDolanKathleen. 2009. “Do Gender Stereotypes Transcend Party?” Political Research Quarterly62 (3): 485–94.
49.
SanbonmatsuKiraMatosYalidyGreeneStacey. 2024. “The Boundaries of ‘Women of Color’: the Political Implications of Non-Hispanic Whites’ Perceptions of Women of Color.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy46: 1–18.
50.
SigelmanCarol K.LeeSigelmanWalkoszBarbara J.NitzMichael. 1995. “Black Candidates, White Voters: Understanding Racial Bias in Political Perceptions.” American Journal of Political Science39 (1): 242–65.
51.
TerkildsenNayda. 1993. “When White Voters Evaluate Black Candidates: the Processing Implications of Candidate Skin Color, Prejudice, and Self-Monitoring.” American Journal of Political Science37 (4): 1032–53.
52.
ThomsenDanielle M.2015. “Why So Few (Republican) Women? Explaining the Partisan Imbalance of Women in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly40 (2): 295–323.
53.
ThomsenDanielle M.SwersMichele L.. 2017. “Which Women Can Run? Gender, Partisanship, and Candidate Donor Networks.” Political Research Quarterly70 (2): 449–63.
54.
TurnerJoel. 2007. “The Messenger Overwhelming the Message: Ideological Cues and Perceptions of Bias in Television News.” Political Behavior29 (4): 441–64.
55.
ValentinoNicholas A.TedBraderJardinaAshley E.. 2013. “Immigration Opposition Among U.S. Whites: General Ethnocentrism or Media Priming of Attitudes About Latinos?” Political Psychology34 (2): 149–66.
56.
WeisbergHerbert F.1980. “A Multidimensional Conceptualization of Party Identification.” Political Behavior2: 33–60.
57.
WestTessa V.PearsonAdam R.DovidioJohn F.JohnsonBlair T.PhillsCarrie E.. 2014. “Racial Attitudes and Visual Cues in Political Judgments: Support for Obama During the 2008 Presidential Election.” Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology20 (4): 583–90.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
