Increasing the descriptive representation of courts often has the aim of improving citizens’ views of the judiciary and thereby promoting acceptance of court decisions. This presumed impact, however, has been subjected to only limited theoretical and empirical scrutiny, particularly as it relates to the views of the minority groups presumed to benefit from diversification efforts. I argue, and then demonstrate with a survey experiment focused on a judge’s identity, that descriptive representation increases support for a court decision, but only insofar that one is not opposed to the decision and previously distrusted the courts. I further find that this effect is found among African-Americans but not among Hispanics or Native Americans, while among Whites there is a backlash from those who trust the courts when a minority judge issues a displeasing decision. These findings demonstrate benefits but also limitations and costs to diversifying the judiciary.
AchurySusanCasellasJason P.HoferScott J.WardMatthew. 2023. “The Impact of Racial Representation on Judicial Legitimacy: White Reactions to Latinos on the Bench.” Political Research Quarterly76 (1): 158–72.
2.
ArmalyMiles T.KrewsonChristopher N.LaneElizabeth A.. 2024. “The Influence of Descriptive Representation on Support for Judicial Nominees and the US Supreme Court.” Political Behavior47: 1–27.
3.
ArnesenSveinungPetersYvette. 2018. “The Legitimacy of Representation: How Descriptive, Formal, and Responsiveness Representation Affect the Acceptability of Political Decisions.” Comparative Political Studies51 (7): 868–99.
4.
ArringtonNancy B.2021. “Judicial Merit Selection: Beliefs About Fairness and the Under-Mining of Gender Diversity on the Bench.” Political Research Quarterly74 (4): 1152–67.
5.
ArringtonNancyBassLeeannAdamGlynnStatonJeffrey K.DelgadoBrianLindbergStaffan I.. 2021. “Constitutional Reform and the Gender Diversification of Peak Courts.” American Political Science Review115 (3): 851–68.
6.
AtkesonLonna RaeCarrilloNancy. 2007. “More is Better: the Influence of Collective Female Descriptive Representation on External Efficacy.” Politics and Gender3 (1): 79–11.
7.
BadasAlexStaufferKatelyn E.. 2018. “Someone like Me: Descriptive Representation and Support for Supreme Court Nominees.” Political Research Quarterly71 (1): 127–42.
8.
BadasAlexSandersBailey K.StaufferKatelyn E.. 2024. “The Role of Judge Gender and Ideology in Hiring Female Law Clerks.” Journal of Law and Courts13 (2): 397–49.
9.
BairdVanessa A.2001. “Building Institutional Legitimacy: the Role of Procedural Justice.” Political Research Quarterly54: 333–54.
10.
BarnesTiffany D.HolmanMirya R.. 2020. “Gender Quotas, Women’s Representation, and Legislative Diversity.” The Journal of Politics82 (4): 1271–86.
11.
BarnesTiffany D.O’BrienDiana Z.. 2018. “Defending the Realm: the Appointment of Female Defense Ministers Worldwide.” American Journal of Political Science62 (2): 355–68.
12.
BartelsBrandon L.JohnstonChristopher D.. 2013. “On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public.” American Journal of Political Science57: 184–99.
13.
BoydChristina L.LeeEpsteinMartinAndrew D.. 2010. “Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging.” American Journal of Political Science54: 389–411.
14.
BracicAnaIsrael-TrummelMackenzieJohnsonTylerTiplerKathleen. 2023. ““Be-Cause he is Gay”: How Race, Gender, and Sexuality Shape Perceptions of Judicial Fair-Ness.” The Journal of Politics85 (4): 1167–81.
15.
BrattonKathleen A.RayLeonard P.. 2002. “Descriptive Representation, Policy Out-Comes, and Municipal Day-Care Coverage in Norway.” American Journal of Political Science46: 428–37.
16.
BunyasiTehama LopezSmithCandis Watts. 2019. “Do all Black Lives Matter Equally to Black People? Respectability Politics and the Limitations of Linked Fate.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics4 (1): 180–25.
ChenPhilipSavageAmanda. 2024. “Amy Coney Barrett Is Not Enough: How Descriptive and Substantive Representation Shape Trust and Legitimacy of the Federal Courts.” Political Research Quarterly77 (4): 1110–29.
19.
ChoiDonghyun DannyHarrisJ. AndrewShen-BayhFiona. 2022. “Ethnic Bias in Judicial Decision Making: Evidence from Criminal Appeals in Kenya.” American Political Science Review116 (3): 1067–80.
20.
ChristensonDino P.GlickDavid M.. 2015. “Chief Justice Roberts’s Health Care Decision Disrobed: the Microfoundations of the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science59 (2): 403–18.
21.
ClaytonAmandaO’BrienDiana Z.PiscopoJennifer M.. 2019. “All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science63 (1): 113–29.
22.
CopusRyanHübertRyanPellatonPaige. 2025. “Trading Diversity? Judicial Diversity and Case Outcomes in Federal Courts.” American Political Science Review119 (2): 832–46.
23.
DawsonMichael C.1994. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton University Press.
24.
De la GarzaRodolfo O.2004. “Latino Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science7 (1): 91–13.
25.
DohertyDavidSchadeMadelineGarbarskiDana. 2025. “Descriptive Representation and Attitudes About Local Government: an Experimental Test Using real-world Stimuli.” Research & Politics12 (2): 20531680251344884.
26.
DriscollAmandaNelsonMichael J.. 2015. “Judicial Selection and the Democratization of Justice: Lessons from the Bolivian Judicial Elections.” Journal of Law and Courts3 (1): 115–48.
27.
EastonDavid. 1975. “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science5 (4): 435–57.
28.
EvansDianaFrancoAnaPolinardJerry L.WenzelJames P.WrinkleRobert D.. 2017. “Who’s on the Bench? the Impact of Latino Descriptive Representation on US Supreme Court Approval Among Latinos and Anglos.” Social Science Quarterly98 (5): 1233–49.
29.
FoxworthRaymondBouldingCarew. 2023. “How Race, Resentment, and Ideology Shape Attitudes About Native American Inherent Rights and Policy Issues.” Political Research Quarterly76: 10659129231180515.
30.
FoxworthRaymondEllenwoodCherylEvansLaura E. 2025. “Surveying Native Americans: Early Lessons from the CMPS.” PS: Political Science & Politics58 (2): 328–32.
31.
GayClaudine. 2001. “The Effect of Black Congressional Representation on Political participation.” American Political Science Review95 (3): 589–602.
32.
GerringJohnJerzakConnor T.ÖncelErzen. 2024. “The Composition of Descriptive Representation.” American Political Science Review118 (2): 784–81.
33.
GibsonJames L.2025. “Do the Effects of Unpopular Supreme Court Rulings Linger? the Dobbs Decision Rescinding Abortion Rights.” American Political Science Review119 (1): 500–07.
34.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science36 (3): 635–64.
35.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.. 2003. “Defenders of Democracy? Legitimacy, Popular Acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court.” The Journal of Politics65 (1): 1–30.
36.
GibsonJames L.NelsonMichael J.. 2014. “The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms, and Recent Challenges Thereto.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science10 (1): 201–19.
37.
GibsonJames L.NelsonMichael J.. 2015. “Is the U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology?” American Journal of Political Science59 (1): 162–74.
38.
GibsonJames L.NelsonMichael J.. 2018. Black and Blue: Black and Blue: How African Americans Judge the U.S. Legal System. Oxford University Press.
39.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.BairdVanessa A.. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review92: 343–58.
40.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.SpenceLester Kenyatta. 2003. “The Supreme Court and the US Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, self-inflicted or Otherwise?” British Journal of Political Science33 (4): 535–56.
41.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.SpenceLester Kenyatta. 2005. “Why do People Accept Public Politics they Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-based Experiment.” Political Research Quarterly58 (2): 187–201.
42.
GibsonJames LLodgeMiltonWoodsonBenjamin. 2014. “Losing, but Accepting: Legitimacy, Positivity Theory, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority.” Law & Society Review48 (4): 837–66.
43.
GriffinJohn DKeaneMichael. 2006. “Descriptive Representation and the Composition of African American Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science50 (4): 998–1012.
44.
GrossmanGuyGazal-AyalOrenPimentelSamuel D.WeinsteinJeremy M.. 2016. “Descriptive Representation and Judicial Outcomes in Multiethnic Societies.” American Journal of Political Science60 (1): 44–69.
45.
HaireSusan BMoyerLaura P. 2015. Diversity Matters: Judicial Policy Making in the US Courts of Appeals. University of Virginia Press.
46.
HarrisAllison P. 2024. “Can Racial Diversity Among Judges Affect Sentencing Outcomes?” American Political Science Review118 (2): 940–55.
47.
HayesMatthewHibbingMatthew V. 2017. “The Symbolic Benefits of Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Political Behavior39: 31–5.
48.
HazeltonMorgan L. W.HinkleRachael K.NelsonMichael J.. 2023. The Elevator Effect: Contact and Collegiality in the American Judiciary. Oxford University Press.
49.
HerrickRebekah. 2020. “Growing up on a Reservation and American Indians’ Political Attitudes.” The Social Science Journal57 (2): 135–50.
50.
HerrickRebekahMendezJeanette Morehouse. 2019. “One Model Does Not Fit All: Group Consciousness and the Political Participation and Attitudes of American Indians.” Social Science Quarterly100 (5): 1577–92.
51.
HomolaJonathan. 2022. “The Effects of Women’s Descriptive Representation on Government Behavior.” Legislative Studies Quarterly47 (2): 295–38.
52.
JardinaAshley. 2019. White Identity Politics. Cambridge University Press.
53.
JeffersonHakeem. 2023. “The Politics of Respectability and Black Americans’ Punitive Attitudes.” American Political Science Review117 (4): 1448–64.
54.
JonesPhilip Edward. 2014. “Does the Descriptive Representation of Gender Influence accountability for Substantive Representation?” Politics and Gender10 (2): 175–99.
KaslovskyJaclynRogowskiJon CStoneAndrew R. 2021. “Descriptive Representation and Public Support for Supreme Court Nominees.” Political Science Research and Methods9 (3): 583–98.
57.
KastellecJonathan. 2013. “Racial Diversity and Judicial Influence on Appellate Courts.” American Journal of Political Science57 (1): 167–83.
58.
KingJonathan M.SchoenherrJessica A.OstranderIan. 2025. “Anchoring or Expanding? Gender and Judicial Nominations.” Political Research Quarterly78 (1): 135–50.
59.
KittilsonMiki CaulSchwindt-BayerLeslie A.. 2012. The Gendered Effects of Electoral Institutions: Political Engagement and Participation. Oxford University Press.
60.
KochJeffrey W.2017. “Partisanship and Non-partisanship Among American Indians.” American Politics Research45 (4): 673–91.
61.
KrehbielJay N. 2024. “Native Americans’ Support for Supreme Court Legitimacy.” Politics, Groups, and Identities1–12.
62.
LeeClaireSolbergRorieWaltenburgEric N.. 2022. “See Jane Judge: Descriptive Representation and Diffuse Support for a State Supreme Court.” Politics, Groups, and Identities10 (4): 581–96.
LowandeKennethRitchieMelindaLauterbachErinn. 2019. “Descriptive and substantive Representation in Congress: Evidence from 80,000 Congressional Inquiries.” American Journal of Political Science63 (3): 644–59.
65.
MadsenMikael RaskMayoralJuan A.StrezhnevAntonVoetenErik. 2022. “Sovereignty, Substance, and Public Support for European Courts’ Human Rights Rulings.” American Political Science Review116 (2): 419–38.
66.
MansbridgeJane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent “Yes”.” The Journal of Politics61 (3): 628–57.
67.
McClainPaula D.Johnson CarewJessica D.WaltonEugeneJrWattsCandis S.. 2009. “Group Membership, Group Identity, and Group Consciousness: Measures of Racial Identity in American Politics?” Annual Review of Political Science12: 471–85.
68.
MeansTaneishaUnahIsaac. 2025. “Public Perceptions of the Fairness of Black and White Judges in Racialized and Non-racialized Cases.” Journal of Law and Courts13 (2): 1–24.
69.
MikkelborgAnna Caroline. 2025. “White Democrats’ Growing Support for Black Politicians in the Era of the “Great Awokening”.” American Political Science Review1–19.
70.
OnoYoshikuniZilisMichael A.. 2022. “Ascriptive Characteristics and Perceptions of Impropriety in the Rule of Law: Race, Gender, and Public Assessments of Whether Judges can be Impartial.” American Journal of Political Science66 (1): 43–58.
71.
OnoYoshikuniZilisMichael A.. 2023. “Do Americans Perceive Diverse Judges as Inherently Biased?” Politics, Groups, and Identities11 (2): 335–44.
72.
PeffleyMarkHurwitzJon. 2010. Justice in America: The Separate Realities of Blacks and Whites. Cambridge University Press.
73.
PitkinHannah F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. University of California Press.
RedmanShane M.2017. “Descriptive Gender Representation and Legitimacy in US Trial Courts.” Justice System Journal38 (4): 311–31.
76.
SanchezGabriel R.MorinJason L.. 2011. “The Effect of Descriptive Representation on Latinos’ Views of Government and of Themselves.” Social Science Quarterly92 (2): 483–58.
77.
SanchezGabriel R.VargasEdward D.. 2016. “Taking a Closer Look at Group Identity: the Link Between Theory and Measurement of Group Consciousness and Linked Fate.” Political Research Quarterly69 (1): 160–74.
SchererNancyCurryBrett. 2010. “Does Descriptive Race Representation Enhance Institutional Legitimacy? the Case of the U.S. Courts.” The Journal of Politics72 (1): 90–104.
80.
Schwindt-BayerLeslie A.MishlerWilliam. 2005. “An Integrated Model of Women’s Representation.” The Journal of Politics67 (2): 407–28.
81.
SenMaya.2017. “How Political Signals Affect Public Support for Judicial Nominations: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment.” Political Research Quarterly70 (2): 374–93.
82.
SmartEmiLeeWoodAbbie. 2025. “Women Robed in Independence: How Women Judges Influence Perceptions of Judicial Independence in Europe.” Journal of Law and Courts13: 1–18.
83.
SongerDonald R.Crews-MeyerKelley A.. 2000. “Does Judge Gender Matter? Decision Making in State Supreme Courts.” Social Science Quarterly81 (3): 750–62.
84.
StaufferKatelyn E.2021. “Public Perceptions of Women’s Inclusion and Feelings of Political Efficacy.” American Political Science Review115 (4): 1226–41.
85.
SteinbergDavid A.McDowellDaniel. 2024. “Race, Representation, and the Legitimacy of International Organizations.” International Organization78 (3): 575–99.
86.
TylerTom R.2006. “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation.” Annual Review of Psychology57 (1): 375–40.
87.
VanbergGeorg. 2005. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
