Climate change litigants have been increasingly deploying existing legal and constitutional structures, and particularly the rights to life and a healthy environment, prompting judiciaries around the world to confront issues of climate change in their interpretation of these constitutional rights. Do these constitutional rights have any positive impact on climate litigation? To what extent do the rights to life and to a healthy environment enhance climate justice by increasing more successful climate litigation? Using an original data set of 1,855 litigation cases from 1992 to 2021, we find robust empirical evidence that while stock of climate laws and the constitutional right to a healthy environment do not have any impact on the outcome of climate lawsuits, the right to life can enhance the success rate of these lawsuits. We argue that climate litigation has extended the scope of the right to life—certainly beyond what John Locke, Thomas Jefferson, and other theorists of natural rights envisioned—to include environmental and climate rights and successfully claim that governments’ climate inactions (in lowering greenhouse gas emissions, for example) pose serious threat towards people’s right to life.
AdelmantVictoriaAlstonPhilipBlaineyMatthew. 2021. “Human Rights and Climate Change Litigation: One Step Forward, Two Steps Backwards in the Irish Supreme Court.” Journal of Human Rights Practice13 (1): 1–23.
2.
AgarwalShagun.2022. “The Rise of Climate Litigation.” In Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/
3.
AngstadtMichael. 2022. “Environmental Norm Diffusion and Domestic Legal Innovation: The Case of Specialized Environmental Courts and Tribunals.” Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law31 (2): 222–32.
4.
AngstadtMichael. 2023. “Can Domestic Environmental Courts Implement International Environmental Law? A Framework for Institutional Analysis.” Transnational Environmental Law12 (2): 318–42.
5.
BartelsBrandon L.2009. “The Constraining Capacity of Legal Doctrine on the U.S. Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review103 (3): 474–95.
6.
BeauregardCharlesCarlsonD’ArcyRobinsonStacy-annCobbCharlesPattonMykela. 2021. “Climate Justice and Rights-Based Litigation in a Post-Paris World.” Climate Policy21 (5): 652–65.
7.
BedauHugo. 1968. “The Right to Life.” The Monist52 (4): 550–72.
8.
BisalbutrFon. 2021. “The Potential Impact of Climate Change Litigation on Government Policy.” Notre Dame Journal of International and Comparative Law11: 272.
9.
BjørnskovChristian. 2024. “Economic Freedom and the Greenhouse Gas Kuznets Curve.” European Journal of Political Economy82: 102530.
10.
BorràsSusana. 2016. “New Transitions from Human Rights to the Environment to the Rights of Nature.” Transnational Environmental Law5 (1): 113–43.
11.
BoydDavid R.2012. The Environmental Rights Revolution: A Global Study of Constitutions, Human Rights, and the Environment. UBC Press.
EisenstadtToddA.Carl LeVanA.TofighMaboudi. “When talk trumps text: The democratizing effects of deliberation during constitution-making, 1974–2011.” American Political Science Review109.3 (2015): 592-612.
14.
ElkinsZacharyGinsburgTomMeltonJames. 2022. “Characteristics of National Constitutions, Version 4.0.” Comparative Constitutions Project; Last modified October 24, 2022. Available at. comparativeconstitutionsproject.org
15.
GangulyGeetanjaliSetzerJoanaHeyvaertVeerle. 2018. “If at First You Don’t Succeed: Suing Corporations for Climate Change.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies38 (4): 841–68.
16.
GellersJoshua C.2017. The Global Emergence of Constitutional Environmental Rights. Routledge.
17.
GellersJoshua C.JeffordsChris. 2018. “Toward Environmental Democracy? Procedural Environmental Rights and Environmental Justice.” Global Environmental Politics18 (1): 99–11.
18.
GhaleighNavraj SinghSetzerJoanaWelikalaAsanga. 2022. The Complexities of Comparative Climate Constitutionalism. University of Edinburgh. School of Law Research Paper Series, No 2022/06.
19.
GonzalezCarmen. 2013. “Environmental Justice and International Environmental Law.” In Routledge Handbook of International Environmental Law, edited by AlamShawkatBhuiyanJahid HossainChowdhuryTareq M. R.TecheraErika, 856. Routledge.
20.
GonzalezCarmen G.2015. “Environmental Justice, Human Rights, and the Global South.” Santa Clara Journal of International Law13 (1): 151–95.
21.
GonzalezCarmen G. “Climate justice and climate displacement: evaluating the emerging legal and policy responses.” Wis. Int'l LJ36 (2018): 366.
22.
GwartneyJamesLawsonRobertHallJoshuaMurphyRyan. 2023. Economic Freedom of the World: 2022 Annual Report. Fraser Institute.
23.
HermajaUlla. 2024. Climate Change Mitigation as the New Human Rights Obligation: Analyzing the 2024 Climate Change Decisions in the European Court of Human Rights.
24.
HoffmannMatthew J. 2011. Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto. Oxford University Press.
JeffordsChris. 2021. “On the Relationship between Constitutional Environmental Human Rights and Sustainable Development Outcomes.” Ecological Economics186: 107049.
27.
JeffordsChrisMinklerLanse. 2016. “Do Constitutions Matter? the Effects of Constitutional Environmental Rights Provisions on Environmental Outcomes.” Kyklos69 (2): 294–35.
28.
JonesPeter. 1999. “Human Rights, Group Rights, and Peoples’ Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly21 (1): 80–17.
KloppenbergJames T.1986. Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870 – 1920. Oxford University Press.
31.
La PortaRafaelLopez-de-SilanesFlorencioShleiferAndrei. 2008. “The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins.” Journal of Economic Literature46 (2): 285–32.
32.
LockeJohn. 1690. The Second Treatise of Civil Government. Prometheus Books, 1986.
33.
MarshallMontyGurrTed Robert. 2020. Polity V Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–218.
34.
MayJames R.DalyErin. 2019. “Global Climate Constitutionalism and Justice in the Courts.” In Research Handbook on Global Climate Constitutionalism, edited by Jaria-ManzanoJordiBorràsSusana, 235–45. Edward Elgar.
35.
McCandlessJulie. 2013. “Reviews: Elizabeth Wicks, the Right To Life and Conflicting Interests.” The Modern Law Review76 (1): 178–90.
36.
McConnellPaul S.1990. “The Unalienable Right to Life.” Journal of Christian Jurisprudence8: 53.
37.
MorehamNicole A.2008. “The Right to Respect for Private Life in the European Convention on Human Rights: A Re-examination.” European Human Rights Law Review1: 44–79.
38.
PeelJacqueline. 2011. “Issues in Climate Change Litigation.” Carbon & Climate Law Review5 (1): 15–24.
39.
PeelJacquelineLinJolene. 2019. “Transnational Climate Litigation: The Contribution of the Global South.” American Journal of International Law113 (4): 679–726.
40.
PeelJacquelineOsofskyHari M.. 2018. “A Rights Turn in Climate Change Litigation?” Transnational Environmental Law7 (1): 37–7.
41.
PrestonBrian J. 2011. “Climate Change Litigation (Part 1).” Carbon & Climate Law Review5 (1): 3–14.
42.
RamcharanB. G.1985. “The Concept and Dimensions of the Right to Life.” In The Right to Life in International Law, edited by RamcharanB. G., 1–32. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
43.
RamcharanR.2012. “IP, Human Rights, and Human Security.” In International Intellectual Property Law and Human Security, 117–150. The Hague, The Netherlands: TMC Asser Press.
44.
Rodríguez-GaravitoCésar. 2020. ““Human Rights: The Global South’s Route to Climate Litigation.” Symposium on Jacqueline Peel & Jolene Lin, “Transnational Climate Litigation: The Contribution of the Global South.”.” American Journal of International Law114 (2020): 40–44.
45.
SchlosbergDavid. 2013. “Theorising Environmental Justice: The Expanding Sphere of a Discourse.” Environmental Politics22 (1): 37–5.
46.
SchlosbergDavidCollinsLisette B.. 2014. “From Environmental to Climate Justice: Climate Change and the Discourse of Environmental Justice.” WIRES Climate Change5 (3): 359–74.
47.
SetzerJoanaBenjaminLisa. 2020. “Climate Litigation in the Global South: Constraints and Innovations.” Transnational Environmental Law9 (1): 77–11.
48.
SetzerJoanaHighamCatherine. 2021. Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation: 2021 Snapshot. The Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
49.
SetzerJoanaVanhalaLisa C.. 2019. “Climate Change Litigation: A Review of Research on Courts and Litigants in Climate Governance.” WIREs Climate Change10 (3): e580.
50.
SheltonDinah. 2017. “Human Rights, Environmental Rights, and the Right to Environment.” In Environmental Rights, edited by VanderheidenSteve, 509–44. Routledge.
51.
ShueHenry. 2014. Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection. Oxford University Press.
The United Nation Environment Programme (UNEP). 2020. Global Climate Litigation Report: 2020 Status Review. UNEP.
54.
TomuschatChristian. 2010. “The Right to Life –Legal and Political Foundations.” In The Right to Life, edited by TomuschatChristianLagrangeEvelyneOeterStefan, 3–18. Koninklijke Brill N.V. Chapter 1.
55.
WicksElizabeth. 2010. The Right to Life and Conflicting Interests. Oxford University Press.
56.
WicksElizabeth. 2012. “The Meaning of ‘Life’: Dignity and the Right to Life in International Human Rights Treaties.” Human Rights Law Review12 (2): 199–29.
57.
WilliamsNoel. 1997. The Right to Life in Japan. Routledge.
58.
ZhuMingzhe. 2024. “Human Rights Approach to Climate Change Litigation and its Limits.” Chinese Yearbook of Human Rights6: 137–62.
59.
ZuckertMichael P.2002. Launching Liberalism: On Lockean Political Philosophy. The University Press of Kansas.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
