How do legislators decide with whom to collaborate? I argue that legislative collaborations are shaped by ethnicity and gender, with legislators from dominant ethnic groups and men legislators having more opportunities to collaborate than non-dominant legislators. These dynamics are likely present even when the nature of the collaboration is not particularly electorally salient. I test this hypothesis using newly collected data on question-asking from local legislators in Delhi. Dominant caste men legislators tend to dominate question-asking collaborations as expected, with men legislators consistently having more collaboration opportunities. The results suggest that legislative power dynamics are present even in lower-stakes interactions and may mean that simply encouraging additional legislator collaborations does not address underlying discriminatory patterns in how dominant legislators select their collaborators.
AijazRumi. 2008. “Form of Urban Local Government in India.” Journal of Asian and African Studies43 (2): 131–154.
2.
AlemánEduardoCalvoErnesto. 2013. “Explaining Policy Ties in Presidential Congresses: A Network Analysis of Bill Initiation Data.” Political Studies61 (2): 356–377.
3.
BäckHannaDebusMarc. 2019. “When Do Women Speak? A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Gender in Legislative Debates.” Political Studies67 (3): 576–596.
4.
BäckHannaDebusMarcMüllerJochen. 2014. “Who Takes the Parliamentary Floor? the Role of Gender in Speech-Making in the Swedish Riksdag.” Political Research Quarterly67 (3): 504–518.
5.
BarnesTiffany. 2016. Gendering Legislative Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
van BergenDiana D.FeddesAllard F.DoosjeBertjanPelsTrees V. M.. 2015. “Collective Identity Factors and the Attitude toward Violence in Defense of Ethnicity or Religion Among Muslim Youth of Turkish and Moroccan Descent.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations47: 89–100.
7.
BerryMarie E.BoukaYolandeKamuruMarilyn Muthoni. 2021. “Implementing Inclusion: Gender Quotas, Inequality, and Backlash in Kenya.” Politics & Gender17 (4): 640–664.
8.
BrassPaul. 2011. The Production of Hindu-Muslim Violence in Contemporary India. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
9.
BrewerMarilynn B.1999. “The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?” Journal of Social Issues55 (3): 429–444.
10.
CatalanoAna. 2009. “Women Acting for Women? an Analysis of Gender and Debate Participation in the British House of Commons 2005-2007.” Politics & Gender5 (1): 45.
11.
ChildsSarahKrookMona Lena. 2009. “Analysing Women’s Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors.” Government and Opposition44 (2): 125–145.
12.
ClarkJennifer HayesCaroVeronica. 2013. “Multimember Districts and the Substantive Representation of Women: An Analysis of Legislative Cosponsorship Networks.” Politics & Gender9 (1): 1–30.
13.
CrispBrian F.DemirkayaBetulSchwindt-BayerLeslie A.MillianCourtney. 2018. “The Role of Rules in Representation: Group Membership and Electoral Incentives.” British Journal of Political Science48 (1): 47–67.
14.
CrispBrian F.KanthakKristinLeijonhufvudJenny. 2004. “The Reputations Legislators Build: With Whom Should Representatives Collaborate?” American Political Science Review98 (4): 703–716.
15.
DesaiSonaldeVannemanReeve. 2015. “India Human Development Survey-II.” doi:10.3886/ICPSR36151.v2.
16.
DesmaraisBruce A.MoscardelliVincent G.SchaffnerBrian F.KowalMichael S.. 2015. “Measuring Legislative Collaboration: The Senate Press Events Network.” Social Networks40: 43–54.
17.
EjdemyrSimonKramonEricRobinsonAmanda Lea. 2018. “Segregation, Ethnic Favoritism, and the Strategic Targeting of Local Public Goods.” Comparative Political Studies51 (9): 1111–1143.
18.
EmersonKatherine T. U.MurphyMary C.. 2014. “Identity Threat at Work: How Social Identity Threat and Situational Cues Contribute to Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Workplace.” Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology20 (4): 508–520.
19.
EriksonJosefinaJosefssonCecilia. 2022. “The Parliament as a Gendered Workplace: How to Research Legislators’ (UN)Equal Opportunities to Represent.” Parliamentary Affairs75 (1): 20–38.
20.
FernandesJorge M.FonsecaMariana Lopes daWonMiguel. 2023. “Closing the Gender Gap in Legislative Debates: The Role of Gender Quotas.” Political Behavior45 (3): 897–921.
21.
FischerManuelVaroneFrédéricGavaRoySciariniPascal. 2019. “How MPs Ties to Interest Groups Matter for Legislative Co-Sponsorship.” Social Networks57: 34–42.
22.
FranceschetSusanPiscopoJennifer M.. 2014. “Sustaining Gendered Practices? Power, Parties, and Elite Political Networks in Argentina.” Comparative Political Studies47 (1): 85–110.
23.
FunkKendall D.MoralesLauraTaylor-RobinsonMichelle M.. 2017. “The Impact of Committee Composition and Agendas on Women’s Participation: Evidence from a Legislature with Near Numerical Equality.” Politics & Gender13 (2): 253–275.
24.
HarwardBrian M.MoffettKenneth W.. 2010. “The Calculus of Cosponsorship in the U.S. Senate.” Legislative Studies Quarterly35 (1): 117–143.
25.
HawkesworthMary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race–Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced–Gendered Institutions.” American Political Science Review97 (4): 529–550.
26.
HeathRoseanna MichelleSchwindt-BayerLeslie A.Taylor-RobinsonMichelle M.. 2005. “Women on the Sidelines: Women’s Representation on Committees in Latin American Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science49 (2): 420–436.
27.
HolmanMirya R.MahoneyAnna. 2018. “Stop, Collaborate, and Listen: Women’s Collaboration in US State Legislatures: Women’s Collaboration in US State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly43 (2): 179–206.
28.
HtunMala. 2004. “Is Gender like Ethnicity? The Political Representation of Identity Groups.” Perspectives on Politics2 (3): 439–458.
29.
HtunMalaOssaJuan Pablo. 2013. “Political Inclusion of Marginalized Groups: Indigenous Reservations and Gender Parity in Bolivia.” Politics, Groups and Identities1 (1): 4–25.
30.
JohnMary E.2007. “Women in Power? Gender, Caste and the Politics of Local Urban Governance.” Economic and Political Weekly42 (39): 3986–3993.
31.
KathleneLyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review88 (3): 560–576.
32.
KesslerDanielKrehbielKeith. 1996. “Dynamics of Cosponsorship.” American Political Science Review90 (3): 555–566.
33.
KimJeong HnKweonYesola. 2022. “Why Do Young Men Oppose Gender Quotas? Group Threat and Backlash to Legislative Gender Quotas.” Legislative Studies Quarterly47 (4): 991–1021.
34.
KirklandJustin H. 2011. “The Relational Determinants of Legislative Outcomes: Strong and Weak Ties Between Legislators.” The Journal of Politics73 (3): 887–898.
35.
KogerGregory. 2003. “Position Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly28 (2): 225–246.
36.
KrookMona Lena. 2015. “Empowerment versus Backlash: Gender Quotas and Critical Mass Theory.” Politics, Groups, and Identities3 (1): 184–188.
37.
LawlessJennifer L.TheriaultSean M.GuthrieSamantha. 2018. “Nice Girls? Sex, Collegiality, and Bipartisan Cooperation in the US Congress.” The Journal of Politics80 (4): 1268–1282.
38.
MeissnerKatharina L.RosénGuri. 2023. “Who Teams Up with the European Parliament? Examining Multilevel Party Cooperation in the European Union.” Government and Opposition58 (3): 456–477.
39.
MicozziJuan Pablo. 2014. “Alliance for Progress? Multilevel Ambition and Patterns of Cosponsorship in the Argentine House.” Comparative Political Studies47 (8): 1186–1208.
40.
MillerMichael G.SutherlandJoseph L.. 2023. “The Effect of Gender on Interruptions at Congressional Hearings.” American Political Science Review117 (1): 103–121.
41.
MimicaNicolásNaviaPatricioCárcamoIgnacio. 2024. “Party Affiliation, District-Level Incentives and the Use of Parliamentary Questions in Chile’s Presidential Democracy.” Government and Opposition59 (2): 526–542.
42.
MuraokaTaishi. 2020. “The Cosponsorship Patterns of Reserved Seat Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly45 (4): 555–580.
43.
NealZachary P.DomagalskiRachelYanXiaoqin. 2022. “Homophily in Collaborations among US House Representatives, 1981-2018.” Social Networks68: 97–106.
44.
OchMalliga. 2020. “Manterrupting in the German Bundestag: Gendered Opposition to Female Members of Parliament?” Politics & Gender16 (2): 388–408.
45.
ParikhSunita. 1997. The Politics of Preference: Democratic Institutions and Affirmative Action in the United States and India. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
46.
RoccaMichael S.SanchezGabriel R.. 2008. “The Effect of Race and Ethnicity on Bill Sponsorship and Cosponsorship in Congress.” American Politics Research36 (1): 130–152.
47.
SchillerWendy J.1995. “Senators as Political Entrepreneurs: Using Bill Sponsorship to Shape Legislative Agendas.” American Journal of Political Science39 (1): 186.
48.
SenkKaitlin. 2021. “Are Women Less Effective at Passing Bills? Exploring the Direct and Indirect Effects of Gender.” Legislative Studies Quarterly46 (3): 791–816.
49.
ShahParth J.BakoreMakarand. 2006. Ward Power: Decentralized Urban Governance. New Delhi: Centre for Civil Society.
50.
ShayoMoses. 2009. “A Model of Social Identity with an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class, and Redistribution.” American Political Science Review103 (2): 147–174.
51.
SkiginNatán. 2019. “Spreading Influence through Weak Ties: Cosponsorship, Legislative Networks, and Bill Success in Fragmented Congresses.” Legislative Studies Quarterly44 (2): 239–269.
52.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C.. 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
53.
ValdiniMelody. 2019. The Inclusion Calculation: Why Men Appropriate Women’s Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54.
WahmanMichaelFrantzeskakisNikolaosYildirimTevfik Murat. 2021. “From Thin to Thick Representation: How a Female President Shapes Female Parliamentary Behavior.” American Political Science Review115 (2): 360–378.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
