This paper takes one of the first, direct approaches to understanding which factors shape which attitudes towards gender equality among political elites. We examine support for gender equality among legislators in 13 Latin American countries, using 10 new questions from the 2015–2018 wave of the Latin American elites survey (PELA). We argue that legislators’ attitudes about gender equality fall into three distinct dimensions: holding egalitarian views, recognizing that gender inequality is a problem, and supporting state action to hasten gender equality. Overall, women express the more gender-equal orientation on all three dimensions, while factors like religiosity and ideology matter differently for different dimensions. These findings demonstrate the need for more nuance in measuring and analyzing attitudes towards gender equality, in order to better understand the link between descriptive and substantive representation.
AlexanderAmy C. 2012. “Change in Women’s Descriptive Representation and the Belief in Women’s Ability to Govern: A Virtuous Circle.” Politics & Gender8 (4): 437–464.
2.
AlexanderAmy C.WelzelChristian. Islam and Patriarchy: How Robust is Muslim Support for Patriarchal Values?International Review of Sociology2011; 21(2): 249–276.
3.
AlexanderAmy C.InglehartRonaldWelzelChristian. Emancipating sexuality: Breakthroughs into a Bulwark of Tradition. Social Indicators Research2016; 129(2): 909–935.
4.
BarnesTiffany. 2016. Gendering Legislative Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
BarnesTiffanyBeallVictoriaHolmanMirya. 2021. “Pink Collar Representation and Budgetary Outcomes in the U.S. States.” Legislative Studies Quarterly46 (1): 119–154.
6.
BarnesTiffanyCórdovaAbby. 2016. “Making Space for Women: Explaining Citizen Support for Legislative Gender Quotas in Latin America.” The Journal of Politics78 (3): 760–636.
7.
BarnesTiffanySaxtonGregory. 2019. “Working-Class Legislators and Perceptions of Representation in Latin America.” Political Research Quarterly72 (4): 910–928.
8.
Batista PereiraFredericoPortoNathália F.F.. 2020. “Gender Attitudes and Public Opinion Towards Electoral Gender Quotas in Brazil.” Political Psychology41 (5): 887–899.
9.
BeallVictoriaBarnesTiffany. 2020. “Mapping Right-Wing Women’s Policy Priorities in Latin America.” Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy41 (1): 36–65.
10.
BeauregardKatrine. 2018. “Partisanship and the Gender Gap: Support for Gender Quotas in Australia.” Australian Journal of Political Science53 (3): 290–319.
11.
BiroliFláviaCaminottiMariana. 2020. “The Conservative Backlash against Gender in Latin America.” Politics & Gender16 (1): 1–6.
12.
BlofieldMerikeEwigChristinaPiscopoJennifer M.. 2017. “The Reactive Left: Gender Equality and the Latin American Pink Tide.” Social Politics24 (4): 345–369.
13.
BohiguesAsbelFernández-i-MarínXavier. 2022. “Drug Legalization, Elite Support, and Government Effectiveness in Latin America.” Journal of Drug Issues52 (2): 250–267. doi:10.1177/00220426211055434
14.
Bohigues AsbelAlexanderAmyPiscopo JenniferM. 2022. “Replication Data for: Opening the Attitudinal Black Box: Three Dimensions of Latin American Elites’ Attitudes about Gender Equality (PRQ).” Harvard Dataverse, V1,UNF:6:aRgrEcM0eXxfOJI84F8Y6w== [fileUNF].
15.
BohiguesAsbelPiscopoJennifer M.. 2021. “¿Identidad de Grupo, Ideología o Reconocimiento? El Apoyo de los y las Legisladoras a Las Cuotas de Género en América Latina.” Revista CIDOB d’ Afers Internacionals127 (April): 95–120.
16.
BohiguesAsbelRivasJosé Manuel. 2019. “Free Trade Agreements and Regional Alliances: Support from Latin American Legislators.” Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional62 (1): 1–22.
17.
CarnesNicholasLupuNoam. 2015. “Rethinking the Comparative Perspective on Class and Representation: Evidence from Latin America.” American Journal of Political Science59: 1–18.
18.
CelisKarenChildsSarah. 2020. Feminist Democratic Representation. New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
ClaytonAmandaJosefssonCeciliaMattesRobertMozaffarShaheen. 2019. “In Whose Interest? Gender and Mass-Elite Priority Congruence in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Comparative Political Studies51 (2): 69–101.
20.
ClaytonAmandaJosefssonCeciliaWangVibeke. 2017. “Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: A Content Analysis of Ugandan Plenary Debates.” Politics & Gender13 (2): 276–304.
21.
CofféHilde. 2012. “Conceptions of Female Political Representation: Perspectives of Rwandan Female Representatives.” Women’s Studies International Forum35 (4): 286–297.
22.
CofféHildeReiserMarion. Political Candidates’ Attitudes Towards Group Representation. The Journal of Legislative Studies2018; 24(3): 272–297.
23.
DahlerupDrude. 2018. “Gender Equality as a Closed Case: A Survey among the Members of the 2015 Danish Parliament.” Scandinavian Political Studies41 (2): 188–209.
24.
DaltonRussel. 2019. Citizen Politics. Los Angeles: CQ Press.
25.
De GeusRoosmarijnShorrocksRosalind. 2020. “Where do Female Conservatives Stand? A Cross-National Analysis of the Issue Positions and Ideological Placement of Female Right-Wing Candidates.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy41 (1): 7–35.
26.
FesslerLeah. 2018. “US Senator Cory Booker on Me Too and Why ‘We Won’t Legislate Our Way to Full Equality’.” Quartz at Work, October 30. https://qz.com/work/1415143/hww4-cory-booker/ (Accessed August 1, 2022).
27.
FilgueiraFernandoMartínez FranzoniJuliana. 2017. “The Diverge in Women’s Economic Empowerment: Class and Gender under the Pink Tide.” Social Politics24 (4): 370–398.
28.
FranceschetSusanPiscopoJennifer M.. 2008. “Gender Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina.” Politics & Gender4 (3): 393–425.
29.
FranceschetSusanPiscopoJennifer M.ThomasGwynn. 2016. “Supermadres, Maternal Legacies, and Women’s Political Participation in Contemporary Latin America.” Journal of Latin American Studies48 (1): 1–32.
30.
FrederickBrian. 2013. “Gender and Roll Call Voting Behavior in Congress: A Cross-Chamber Analysis.” The American Review of Politics34: 1–20.
31.
GalliganYvonneClaveroSara. 2008. “Prospects for Women’s Legislative Representation in Postsocialist Europe: The Views of Female Politicians.” Gender & Society22 (2): 149–171.
32.
HinojosaMagdaCarleJillWoodallGina Serignese. 2018. “Speaking as a Woman: Descriptive Presentation in Costa Rica’s Legislative Assembly.” Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy39 (4): 407–429.
33.
HtunMalaLacalleMarinaMicozziJuan Pablo. 2013. “Does Women’s Presence Change Legislative Behavior? Evidence from Argentina, 1983-2007.” Journal of Politics in Latin America5 (1): 95–125.
34.
HtunMalaPowerTimothy J.. 2006. “Gender, Parties, and Support for Equal Rights in the Brazilian Congress.” Latin American Politics and Society48 (4): 83–104.
35.
HtunMalaWeldonS. Laurel. 2018. The Logics of Gender Justice: State Action on Women’s Rights Around the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36.
InglehartRonaldNorrisPippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
37.
JenkinsShannon. How Gender Influences Roll Call Voting. Social Science Quarterly2012; 93(2): 415–433.
38.
JosefssonCecilia. 2020. “How Candidate Selection Structures and Genders Political Ambition: Illustrations from Uruguay.” European Journal of Politics and Gender3 (1): 61–78.
39.
KangAlice J.TrippAili Mari. 2018. “Coalitions Matter: Citizenship, Women, and Quota Adoption in Africa.” Perspectives on Politics16 (1): 73–91.
40.
KerevelYann P.AtkesonLonna Rae. 2015. “Reducing Stereotypes of Female Political Leaders in Mexico.” Political Research Quarterly68 (4): 732–744.
41.
KittilsonMiki Caul. 2008. “Representing Women: The Adoption of Family Leave in Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Politics70 (2): 323–334.
42.
KitscheltHerbertHawkinsKirk A.LunaJuan PabloRosasGuillermoZeichmeisterElizabeth J.. (eds). 2010. Latin American Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
LupuNoam. 2016. Party Brands in Crisis: Partisanship, Brand Dilution, and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
MainwaringScott (ed). 2018. Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
MateosAraceliCorralMargarita. 2022. “Partial Non-Response in Political Elite Studies: An Approach to Parliamentary Elites in Latin America.” Quality & Quantity, Online first. doi:10.1007/s11135-022-01317-9
MeierPetra. 2012. “Paradoxes in the Meanings of Quotas in Belgium.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, edited by FranceschetSusanKrookMona LenaPiscopoJennifer M., 157–712. New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
MicozziJuan Pablo. 2018. “Division or Union of Labor? Analyzing Workers’ Representation in the Argentine Congress.” Latin American Politics and Society60 (4): 93–112.
49.
MikołajczakMałgorzataPietrzakJanina. Ambivalent Sexism and Religion: Connected Through Values. Sex Roles2014; 70(9–10): 387–399.
50.
MöhringKatjaTeneyCéline. 2019. “Equality Prescribed? Contextual Determinants of Citizens’ Support for Gender Boardroom Quotas Across Europe.” Comparative European Politics17 (6): 1–30.
51.
MorganJanaBuiceMelissa. 2013. “Latin American Attitudes toward Women in Politics: The Influence of Elite Cues, Female Advancement, and Individual Characteristics.” American Political Science Review107 (4): 644–662.
52.
O’BrienDianaPiscopoJennifer M.. 2019. “The Impact of Women in Parliament.” In The Handbook of Women’s Political Rights, edited by FranceschetSusanKrookMona LenaTanNetina, 53–72. New York: Palgrave.
PiscopoJennifer M. 2020. “Women in Politics in Latin America.” In Women, Policy, and Political Leadership, edited by EchleChristianSarmahMegha, 77–88. Singapore: UN Women and the Konrad Adenaeur Foundation.
55.
PiscopoJennifer M. Beyond Hearth and Home: Female Legislators, Feminist Policy Change and Substantive Representation in Mexico. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política2014; 23(2): 87–110.
56.
SaieghSebastian M. 2009. “Recovering a Basic Space from Elite Surveys: Evidence from Latin America.” Legislative Studies Quarterly34 (1): 117–145.
57.
Schwindt-BayerLeslie. 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science50 (3): 570–585.
58.
SeguinoStephanie. 2011. "Help or Hindrance? Religion’s Impact on Gender Inequality in Attitudes and Outcomes." World Development39 (8): 1308–1321.
59.
SetzlerMark. 2015. “Does Religion Bias Individuals against Female Political Leadership in Latin America?” The Latin Americanist59 (4): 47–72.
60.
SingerMatthew. 2021. “Fiddling while Democracy Burns: Partisan Reactions to Weak Democracy in Latin America.” Perspectives on Politics, FirstView, 1–18. doi:10.1017/S1537592721002899
61.
SmithAmy EricaWarmingKatherineHenningsValerie M.. 2017. “Refusing to Know a Woman’s Place: The Causes and Consequences of Rejecting Stereotypes of Women Politicians in the Americas.” Politics, Groups, and Identities5 (1): 132–151.
62.
SmithPeterSellsCameron. Democracy in Latin America: Political Change in Comparative Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
63.
SokolovBoris. 2018. “The Index of Emancipative Values: Measurement Model Misspecifications.” American Political Science Review112 (2): 395–408.
64.
SwersMichele. 2005. “Connecting Descriptive and Substantive Representation: An Analysis of Sex Differences in Cosponsorship Activity.” Legislative Studies Quarterly30 (3): 407–433.
65.
WängnerudLena. 2015. The Principles of Gender-Sensitive Parliaments. New York: Routledge.
XydiasChristina. 2014. “Women’s Rights in Germany: Generations and Gender Quotas.” Politics & Gender10 (1): 4–32.
68.
XydiasChristina. 2013. “Mapping the Language of Women’s Interests: Sex and Party Affiliation in the Bundestag.” Political Studies61 (2): 319–340.
69.
ZarembergGisela. 2020. “Feminism and Conservatism in Mexico.” Politics & Gender16 (1): 19–25.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
