Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Marginalized groups frequently adopt a respectability politics strategy, presenting themselves as adhering to dominant norms to gain public support. The LGBTQ movement, for example, has consciously portrayed same-gender relationships as exemplifying heteronormative values to win over straight Americans. But how effective is this strategy? Two survey experiments show that presenting LGB people as adhering to, or violating, norms of monogamy and exclusivity has null to minimal effects on straight respondents’ views of them or support for their rights. Furthermore, there is no evidence that the effects are moderated by (1) respondents’ political predispositions; or (2) the race, ethnicity, or gender of the LGB people being highlighted. Emphasizing the respectability of same-gender relationships is not as effective as the movement has assumed. More broadly, these results call into question the assumption that highlighting “respectable” members of marginalized groups is an effective way to change public opinion.

Keywords

respectability politics LGB rights public opinion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achen

C. H.

Bartels

L. M.

2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Adler

2009. “Before Rosa Parks, There Was Claudette Colvin.” NPR, March 15. https://www.npr.org/2009/03/15/101719889/before-rosa-parks-there-was-claudette-colvin.

Balos

Fellows

M. L.

1999. “A Matter of Prostitution: Becoming Respectable.” NYU Law Review 74:1220–1303.

Beam

2018. “What’s Love Got to Do with It? Queer Politics and the “Love Pivot.” In Queer Activism after Marriage Equality, edited by DeFilippis

J. N.

Yarbrough

M. W.

Jones

, 53–60. London: Routledge.

Becker

2014. Forcing the Spring: Inside the Fight for Marriage Equality. New York: Penguin Press.

Brenan

2020. “Record-Low 54% in U.S. Say Death Penalty Morally Acceptable.” Gallup, June 23. https://news.gallup.com/poll/312929/record-low-say-death-penalty-morally-acceptable.aspx.

Brewer

P. R.

2003. “The Shifting Foundations of Public Opinion about Gay Rights.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1208–20.

Broockman

Kalla

2016. “Durably Reducing Transphobia: A Field Experiment on Door-to-Door Canvassing.” Science 352 (6282): 220–24.

Brown

2020. “Nearly Half of U.S. Adults Say Dating Has Gotten Harder for Most People in the Last 10 Years.” Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

10.

Carpenter

2012. Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence V. Texas. New York: W.W. Norton.

11.

Cohen

C. J.

1997. “Punks, Bulldaggers, and Welfare Queens: The Radical Potential of Queer Politics?” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian & Gay Studies 3:437–65.

12.

Cohen

C. J.

1999. The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

13.

Conover

P. J.

1988. “The Role of Social Groups in Political Thinking.” British Journal of Political Science 18 (1): 51–76.

14.

Dafoe

Zhang

Caughey

2018. “Information Equivalence in Survey Experiments.” Political Analysis 26 (4): 399–416.

15.

Egami

Imai

2019. “Causal Interaction in Factorial Experiments: Application to Conjoint Analysis.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 114 (526): 529–40.

16.

Fackler

K. M.

2016. “Ambivalent Frames: Rosa Parks and the Visual Grammar of Respectability.” Souls 18 (2–4): 271–82.

17.

Frank

2017. Awakening: How Gays and Lesbians Brought Marriage Equality to America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

18.

Frantz

C. M.

Janoff-Bulman

2000. “Considering Both Sides: The Limits of Perspective Taking.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 22 (1): 31–42.

19.

Freedom to Marry. 2010. “Moving Marriage Forward: Building Majority Support for Marriage.” https://freemarry.3cdn.net/1809cf9c79a249a415_ztm6blgzo.pdf

20.

Gadarian

S. K.

van der Vort

2018. “The Gag Reflex: Disgust Rhetoric and Gay Rights in American Politics.” Political Behavior 40 (2): 521–43.

21.

Gaddis

S. M.

2017a. “How Black Are Lakisha and Jamal? Racial Perceptions from Names Used in Correspondence Audit Studies.” Sociological Science 4:469–89.

22.

Gaddis

S. M.

2017b. “Racial/Ethnic Perceptions from Hispanic Names: Selecting Names to Test for Discrimination.” Socius 3:1–11.

23.

Garretson

J. J.

2015. “Exposure to the Lives of Lesbians and Gays and the Origin of Young People’s Greater Support for Gay Rights.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 27 (2): 277–88.

24.

Godsoe

2015. “Perfect Plaintiffs.” The Yale Law Journal Forum 125: 136–155.

25.

Hainmueller

Hopkins

D. J.

Yamamoto

2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis 22 (1): 1–30.

26.

Hall

2014. Same-Sex Couple Thrive in Conservative Nashville Suburb. Tennessean, March 22. https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2014/03/21/sex-couple-thrives-conservative-nashville-burb/6717331/.

27.

Harris

F. C.

2014. “The Rise of Respectability Politics.” Dissent 61 (1): 33–37.

28.

Harrison

B. F.

Michelson

M. R.

2017a. Listen, We Need to Talk: How to Change Attitudes about LGBT Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

29.

Harrison

B. F.

Michelson

M. R.

2017b. “What’s Love Got to Do With It? Emotion, Rationality, and Framing LGBT Rights.” New Political Science 39 (2): 177–97.

30.

Higginbotham

E. B.

1993. Righteous Discontent: The Women’s Movement in the Black Baptist Church, 1880-1920. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

31.

Hindman

M. D.

2019. “Promiscuity of the Past: Neoliberalism and Gay Sexuality Pre- and Post-AIDS.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 7 (1): 52–70.

32.

Hunter

N. D.

2017. “Varieties of Constitutional Experience: Democracy and the Marriage Equality Campaign.” UCLA Law Review 64:1665–1726.

33.

Jones

P. E.

Brewer

P. R.

Young

D. G.

Lambe

J. L.

Hoffman

L. H.

2018. “Explaining Public Opinion toward Transgender People, Rights, and Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82 (2): 252–78.

34.

Joshi

2012. “Respectable queerness.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 43 (2): 415–4682015.

35.

Kennedy

2015. Lifting as we climb. Harper’s Magazine. https://harpers.org/archive/2015/10/lifting-as-we-climb/

36.

Leeper

T. J.

Hobolt

S. B.

Tilley

2020. “Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments.” Political Analysis 28:207–21.

37.

Levit

2010. “Theorizing and Litigating the Rights of Sexual Minorities.” Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 19 (1): 21–63.

38.

Levy

2013. “The Perfect Wife.” New Yorker, September 23. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/09/30/the-perfect-wife

39.

Lewis

D. C.

Flores

A. R.

Haider-Markel

D. P.

Miller

P. R.

Tadlock

B. L.

Taylor

J. K.

2017. “Degrees of Acceptance: Variation in Public Attitudes toward Segments of the LGBT Community.” Political Research Quarterly 70 (4): 861–75.

40.

Lewis

G. B.

2011. “The Friends and Family Plan: Contact with Gays and Support for Gay Rights.” Policy Studies Journal 39:217–38.

41.

Lithwick

2012. “Extreme Makeover: The Story behind the Story of Lawrence v. Texas.” The New Yorker, March 12. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/03/12/extreme-makeover-dahlia-lithwick

42.

Lopez Bunyasi

Smith

C.W.

2019. “Do All Black Lives Matter Equally to Black People? Respectability Politics and the Limitations of Linked Fate.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics 4:180–215.

43.

Miller

A. M.

2004. “Sexuality, Violence against Women, and Human Rights: Women Make Demands and Ladies Get Protection.” Health and Human Rights Journal 7 (2): 17–47.

44.

Moscowitz

2013. The Battle over Marriage: Gay Rights Activism through the Media. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.

45.

Murib

2018. “Trumpism, Citizenship, and the Future of the LGBTQ Movement.” Politics & Gender 14:649–72.

46.

Nelson

T. E.

Kinder

D. R.

1996. “Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion.” Journal of Politics 58 (4): 1055–78.

47.

O’Neill

2018. “The Queer Case of the LGBT Movement.” University of Hawai’i Law Review 41 (27): 1–51.

48.

Pascar

2018. “From Homonormativity to Polynormativity.” In Queer Families and Relationships after Marriage Equality, edited by Yarbrough

DeFilippis

J. N.

Jones

New York: Routledge.

49.

Robinson

R. K.

Frost

D. M.

2018. “The Afterlife of Homophobia.” Arizona Law Review 60 (2): 213–89.

50.

Sharpless

2016. “Immigrants Are Not Criminals”: Respectability, Immigration Reform, and Hyperincarceration.” Houston Law Review 53:691–765.

51.

Sirin

C. V.

Valentino

N. A.

Villalobos

J. D.

2016. “Group Empathy Theory: The Effect of Group Empathy on US Intergroup Attitudes and Behavior in the Context of Immigration Threats.” Journal of Politics 78 (3): 893–908.

52.

Strolovitch

D. Z.

2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

53.

Strolovitch

D. Z.

Crowder

C. Y.

2018. “Respectability, Anti-Respectability, and Intersectionally Responsible Representation.” PS: Political Science and Politics 51 (2): 340–44.

54.

Woodly

D. R.

2015. The Politics of Common Sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

4.89 MB

Respectability Politics and Straight Support for LGB Rights

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material