Not all pieces of legislation introduced for consideration are equally likely to be successful. The characteristics of legislation’s cosponsors can influence bill passage rates. Despite facing marginalization in legislative bodies and more electoral vulnerability, women are effective lawmakers. We argue that one way by which women overcome marginalization and gendered expectations of performance is bill success from legislation cosponsored with other women. Testing this expectation on bills (140,000+) introduced in U.S. state legislatures in forty states in 2015, we find increased bill success from women’s cosponsorship with each other and women from the other party. Using variation in the share of women in legislative chambers and in legislative leadership, we find evidence to suggest that women’s success emerges both from marginalization and gendered opportunities.
AllenPeterChildsSarah. 2019. “The Grit in the Oyster? Women’s Parliamentary Organizations and the Substantive Representation of Women.” Political Studies67 (3): 618–38.
4.
AndersonWilliamBox-SteffensmeierJanetSinclair-ChapmanValeria. 2003. “The Keys to Legislative Success in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly28 (3): 357–86.
5.
AnziaSarahBerryChristopher R.2011. “The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressman?” American Journal of Political Science55 (3): 478–93.
6.
AtkesonLonna RaeCarrilloNancy. 2007. “More Is Better: The Influence of Collective Female Descriptive Representation on External Efficacy.” Gender and Politics3 (1): 79–101.
7.
AtkinsonMaryWindettJason. 2019. “Gender Stereotypes and the Policy Priorities of Women in Congress.” Political Behavior41:769–89. doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9471-7.
8.
BarnesTiffany D.2012. “Gender and Legislative Preferences: Evidence from the Argentine Provinces.” Politics & Gender8 (4): 483–507.
9.
BarnesTiffany D.2016. Gendering Legislative Behavior: Institutional Constraints and Collaboration in Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BauerNichole M.2017. “The Effects of Counterstereotypic Gender Strategies on Candidate Evaluations.” Political Psychology38 (2): 279–95.
11.
BauerNichole M.2020a. “Shifting Standards: How Voters Evaluate the Qualifications of Female and Male Candidates.” The Journal of Politics82 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1086/705817.
12.
BauerNichole M.2020b. The Qualifications Gap: Why Women Must Be Better than Men to Win Political Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BauerNichole M.YongLaurel HarbridgeKrupnikovYanna. 2017. “Who Is Punished? Conditions Affecting Voter Evaluations of Legislators Who Do not Compromise.” Political Behavior39 (2): 279–300.
14.
BeckwithKarenCowell-MeyersKimberly. 2007. “Sheer Numbers: Critical Representation Thresholds and Women’s Political Representation.” PS: Political Science & Politics5 (3): 553–65.
15.
BjarnegårdElin. 2013. Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment: Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
BlairDianeStanleyJeanie. 1991. “Personal Relationships and Legislative Power: Male and Female Perceptions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly16 (4): 495–507.
17.
BolzendahlCatherine. 2014. “Opportunities and Expectations: The Gendered Organization of Legislative Committees in Germany, Sweden, and the United States.” Gender & Society28 (6): 847–76.
18.
Box-SteffensmeierJanetChristensonDinoCraigAlison. 2019. “Cue-Taking in Congress: Interest Group Signals from Dear Colleague Letters.” American Journal of Political Science63 (1): 163–80.
19.
BrattonKathleen A.2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics & Gender1 (1): 97–125. doi:10.1017/S1743923X0505004X.
20.
BrattonKathleen A.RouseStella M.2011. “Networks in the Legislative Arena: How Group Dynamics Affect Cosponsorship.” Legislative Studies Quarterly36 (3): 423–60.
21.
CasseseErin C.HolmanMirya R.2018. “Party and Gender Stereotypes in Campaign Attacks.” Political Behavior40:785–807. doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9423-7.
22.
Center for American Women and Politics. 2001. Women State Legislators: Past, Present, and Future. New Brunswick: Center for American Women and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
23.
Center for American Women and Politics. 2018. Current Numbers Women in American Politics. New Brunswick: Eagleton Institute, Rutgers University.
24.
Center for American Women and Politics. 2015. Women in State Legislative Leadership. New Brunswick: Center for American Women and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.
25.
ChildsSarah. 2004. “A Feminised Style of Politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons.” British Journal of Politics & International Relations6 (1): 3–19.
26.
CostaMia.2020. “He Said, She Said: The Gender Double Bind in Legislator-Constituent Communication.” Politics & Gender. Published electronically February. doi:10.1017/S1743923X19000862.
27.
CrispBrianKanthakKristinLeijonhufvudJenny. 2004. “The Reputations Legislators Build: With Whom Should Representatives Collaborate?”American Political Science Review98 (4): 703–16.
28.
DeenRebecca E.LittleThomas H.1999. “Getting to the Top: Factors Influencing the Selection of Women to Positions of Leadership in State Legislatures.” State and Local Government Review31 (2): 123–34.
29.
DittmarKellySanbonmatsuKiraCarrollSusan J.2018. A Seat at the Table: Congresswomen’s Perspectives on Why Their Presence Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
EatoughMaddiePreeceJessica RobinsonBarberMichael. 2020. “Unorthodox Lawmaking & Legislator Productivity: LawProM Bill Text Reuse Measure.” Working Paper.
FultonSarah A.2012. “Running Backwards and in High Heels the Gendered Quality Gap and Incumbent Electoral Success.” Political Research Quarterly65 (2): 303–14.
33.
FultonSarah A.DhimaKostanca. 2020. “The Gendered Politics of Congressional Elections.” Political Behavior 1–27. doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09604-7.
34.
GreeneZacharyO’BrienDiana Z.2016. “Diverse Parties, Diverse Agendas? Female Politicians and the Parliamentary Party’s Role in Platform Formation.” European Journal of Political Research55:435–53.
35.
GutmannA.ThompsonD.2012. The Spirit of Compromise: Why Governing Demands It and Campaigning Undermines It. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
36.
HansenEric R.ClarkChristopher J.2020. “Institutional Barriers to Diversity in Party Leadership: Evidence from State Legislatures.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly20 (1): 81–107.
37.
HibbingJohn R.1991. Congressional Careers: Contours of Life in the US House of Representatives. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
38.
HittMatthew P.VoldenCraigWisemanAlan E.2017. “Spatial Models of Legislative Effectiveness.” American Journal of Political Science61 (3): 575–90.
39.
HöhmannDaniel. 2020. “When Do Men Represent Women’s Interests in Parliament? How the Presence of Women in Parliament Affects the Legislative Behavior of Male Politicians.” Swiss Political Science Review26 (1): 31–50. doi:10.1111/spsr.12392.
40.
HolmanMirya R.2015. Women in Politics in the American City. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
41.
HolmanMirya R.MahoneyAnna. 2018. “Stop, Collaborate, and Listen: Women’s Collaboration in US State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly43:179–206.
42.
HolmanMirya R.MahoneyAnna. 2019. “The Choice Is Yours: Caucus Typologies and Collaboration in U.S. State Legislatures.” Representation55 (1): 47–63. doi:10.1080/00344893.2019.1581079.
43.
HomolaJonathan.2021. “The Effects of Women’s Descriptive Representation on Government Behavior.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. Published electronically February. doi:10.1111/lsq.12330.
44.
Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2008. Equality in Politics: A Survey of Women and Men in Parliaments. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.
45.
JenkinsShannon. 2007. “A Woman’s Work Is Never Done? Fund-Raising Perception and Effort among Female State Legislative Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly60 (2): 230–39. doi:10.1177/1065912907301682.
KanthakKristinKrauseGeorge A.2012. The Diversity Paradox. New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
KathleneLyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policy-Making: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” American Political Science Review88:560–76.
49.
KettlerJaclyn J.2020. “Buying Their Way in: Redistribution of Campaign Resources as a Path to State Legislative Leadership for Women.” The Social Science Journal. Published electronically February. doi:10.1080/03623319.2020.1727219.
50.
KingdonJohn W.1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
51.
KirklandJustin H.2011. “The Relational Determinants of Legislative Outcomes: Strong and Weak Ties between Legislators.” The Journal of Politics73 (3): 887–98.
52.
KirklandJustin H.WilliamsR. Lucas. 2014. “Partisanship and Reciprocity in Cross-Chamber Legislative Interactions.” Journal of Politics76 (3): 754–69.
53.
KogerGregory. 2003. “Position Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly28 (2): 225–46.
54.
KrehbielKeith. 1995. “Cosponsors and Wafflers from A to Z.” American Journal of Political Science39 (4): 906–23.
55.
KrutzGlenn. 2005. “Issues and Institutions: ‘Winnowing’ in the U.S. Congress.” American Journal of Political Science49 (2): 313–26.
56.
LazarusJeffreySteigerwaltAmy. 2018. Gendered Vulnerability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
57.
LowandeKennethRitchieMelindaLauterbachErinn. 2019. “Descriptive and Substantive Representation in Congress: Evidence from 80,000 Congressional Inquiries.” American Journal of Political Science63 (3): 644–59. doi:10.1111/ajps.12443.
58.
MahoneyAnna Mitchell. 2018. Women Take Their Place in State Legislatures the Creation of Women’s Caucuses. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
MayhewDavid R.1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
61.
MintromMichael. 1997. “Policy Entrepreneurs and the Diffusion of Innovation.” American Journal of Political Science41 (3): 738–70.
62.
NorrisPippaLovenduskiJoni. 1989. “Women Candidates for Parliament: Transforming the Agenda?”British Journal of Political Science19 (1): 106–15.
63.
NugentMary K.2019. “When Does He Speak for She? Men Representing Women in Parliament.” PhD thesis, School of Graduate Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick.
64.
O’BrienDiana Z.2015. “Rising to the Top: Gender, Political Performance, and Party Leadership in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science59 (4): 1022–39.
65.
O’BrienDiana Z.2018. “‘Righting’ Conventional Wisdom: Women and Right Parties in Established Democracies.” Politics & Gender14 (1): 27–55.
66.
OchMalligaShamesShauna L., eds. 2018. The Right Women: Republican Party Activists, Candidates, and Legislators. Santa Barbara: Praeger.
67.
OndercinHeather L.2020. “Why Strategic Behavior Doesn’t Always Lead to Increased Women’s Representation.” Working Paper.
68.
OsbornTracy. 2012. How Women Represent Women: Political Parties, Gender and Representation in the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.
69.
OsbornTracy. 2014. “Women State Legislators and Representation: The Role of Political Parties and Institutions.” State and Local Government Review46 (2): 146–55.
70.
PoggioneSarah. 2004. “Exploring Gender Differences in State Legislators’ Policy Preferences.” Political Research Quarterly57 (2): 305–14.
71.
PreuhsRobert R.2005. “Descriptive Representation, Legislative Leadership, and Direct Democracy: Latino Influence on English Only Laws in the States, 1984-2002.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly5 (3): 203–24.
72.
ProvinsTessa. 2019. “The Effect of Gender on Member Assignments to Committees in State Legislatures.” Manuscript.
73.
RoccaMichaelGordonStacy. 2010. “The Position-Taking Value of Bill Sponsorship in Congress.” Political Research Quarterly63 (2): 387–97.
74.
SacksKaren Brodkin. 1988. “Gender and Grassroots Leadership.” In Women and the Politics of Empowerment, edited by AnnBookmanMorgenSandra, 77–94. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
75.
SandersBailey. 2018. “Partisan Bridges to Bipartisanship: The Case of Contraceptive Coverage.” Legislative Studies Quarterly43 (3): 521–46.
76.
SawerMarian. 2000. “Parliamentary Representation of Women: From Discourses of Justice to Strategies of Accountability.” International Political Science Review21 (4): 361–80.
77.
SchillerWendy J.1995. “Senators as Political Entrepreneurs: Using Bill Sponsorship to Shape Legislative Agendas.” American Journal of Political Science39:186–203.
78.
SchneiderMonica C.BosAngela L.2019. “The Application of Social Role Theory to the Study of Gender in Politics.” Political Psychology40 (Suppl. 1): 173–213.
79.
SenkKaitlin.2020. “Are Women Less Effective at Passing Bills? Exploring the Direct and Indirect Effects of Gender.” Legislative Studies Quarterly. Published electronically August 6. doi:10.1111/lsq.12303.
80.
ShimJaemin.2020. “Gender Politics and Legislative Networks in Taiwan: An Analysis of Women-Bill Co-Sponsorship and Bill Success.” Parliamentary Affairs. Published electronically January 25. doi:10.1093/pa/gsz050.
81.
ShorBorisMcCartyNolan. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.”American Political Science Review: 530–551.
82.
SwersMichele L.2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
83.
SwersMichele L.2005. “Connecting Descriptive and Substantive Representation: An Analysis of Sex Differences in Cosponsorship Activity.” Legislative Studies Quarterly30 (3): 407–33.
84.
SwersMichele L.2013. Women in the Club: Gender and Policy Making in the Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85.
SwiftClint S.VanderMolenKathryn. 2021. “Marginalization and Mobilization: The Roots of Female Legislators’ Collaborative Advantage in the States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly. Published electronically April 19. doi:10.1017/spq.2020.9.
86.
Tam ChoWendy K.FowlerJames H.2010. “Legislative Success in a Small World: Social Network Analysis and the Dynamics of Congressional Legislation.” The Journal of Politics72 (1): 124–35.
87.
ThomsenDanielle M.KingAaron S.2020. “Women’s Representation and the Gendered Pipeline to Power.” American Political Science Review114:989–1000. doi:10.1017/S0003055420000404.
88.
ThomsenDanielle M.SandersBailey K.2020. “Gender Differences in Legislator Responsiveness.” Perspectives on Politics18 (4): 1017–30. doi:10.1017/S1537592719003414.
89.
TrueJacqui. 2003. “Mainstreaming Gender in Global Public Policy.” International Feminist Journal of Politics5 (3): 368–96.
90.
VoldenCraigWisemanAlan E.WittmerDana E.2013. “When Are Women More Effective Lawmakers Than Men?”American Journal of Political Science57 (2): 326–41.
91.
WawroGregory. 2010. Legislative Entrepreneurship in the US House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
