Much attention is paid to how mechanisms for selecting political officials shape which types of officials hold positions of power, but selection procedures do not always produce the desired outcomes. In the context of the judiciary, many expected “merit” selection procedures to facilitate the selection of women justices to the bench, an expectation that has not been realized. Applying theories of procedural fairness to judicial selection procedures, I argue that observers’ beliefs that merit selection procedures are more “fair” (relative to unilateral selection procedures) makes observers more accepting of all-male benches. Survey experimental evidence demonstrates that respondents do perceive merit selection procedures as more fair than gubernatorial selection procedures, a priori. In turn, respondents are less critical of all-male courts when judges are selected through a merit selection procedure. These findings contribute to our understanding of the ways in which (1) selection institutions shape prospects for gender diversity, (2) institutional design can have unintended consequences, and (3) procedural fairness can obscure accountabilituy for suboptimal outcomes.
AlozieNicholas O.1988. “Black Representation on State Judiciaries.”Social Science Quarterly69:979–86.
2.
AlozieNicholas O.1990. “Distribution of Women and Minority Judges: The Effects of Judicial Selection Methods.”Social Science Quarterly71 (2): 315–25.
3.
Arana ArayaIgnacioHughesMelanie M.Pérez-LiñánAníbal. 2020. “Judicial Reshuffles and Women Justices in Latin America.”American Journal of Political Science. Published electronically July 20. doi:10.1111/ajps.12543.
4.
ArringtonNancy B.2018a. “Gender and Judicial Replacement: The Case of U.S. State Supreme Courts.”Journal of Law and Courts6 (1): 127–54.
5.
ArringtonNancy B.2018b. “Qualification, Selection, and Retirement Characteristics of Women, Minority, and Minority Women State Supreme Court Judges. In Race, Gender, Sexuality, and the Politics of the American Judiciary, edited by NavarroSharonHernandezSamantha, 11–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
ArringtonNancy B.2020. “Group Selection and Opportunities for Gender Diversity in the Judiciary.”Representation56 (2): 149–71.
7.
ArringtonNancy B.BassLeeannGlynnAdamStatonJeffrey K.DelgadoBrianLindbergStaffan I. 2017. “Gender Diversity on High Courts.” Varieties of Democracy Institute: Working Paper No. 54.
BerksonLarry C.1980. “Carter’s Judicial Selection System: How Well Does It Work.”Judges Journal19:4.
11.
BerksonLarry C.CarbonSusanNeffAlan. 1979. “A Study of the U.S. Circuit Judge Nominating Commission: Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations.”Judicature63:104–29.
12.
BoppJamesJr.2013. “The Perils of Merit Selection.”Indiana Law Review46:87–102.
13.
BracePaulBoyeaBrent D.2008. “State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges.”American Journal of Political Science52 (2): 360–72.
14.
BrattonKathleen A.SpillRorie Law. 2002. “Existing Diversity and Judicial Selection: The Role of the Appointment Method in Establishing Gender Diversity in State Supreme Courts.”Social Science Quarterly83 (2): 504–18.
15.
BraunVirginiaClarkeVictoria. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.”Qualitative Research in Psychology3 (2): 77–101.
16.
BrightStephen B.KeenanPatrick J.1995. “Judges and the Politics of Death: Deciding between the Bill of Rights and the Next Election in Capital Cases.”Boston University Law Review75:759–835.
17.
CannDamon. 2006. “Beyond Accountability and Independence: Judicial Selection and State Court Performance.”Judicature90:226–32.
18.
CarbonSusanHouldenPaulineBerksonLarry. 1982. “Women on the State Bench: Their Characteristics and Attitudes about Judicial Selection.”Judicature65 (6): 294–305.
19.
ChoiStephen J.GulatiG. MituPosnerEric A.2010. “Professionals or Politicians: The Uncertain Empirical Case for an Elected rather than Appointed Judiciary.”The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization26 (2): 290–336.
20.
ClarkMary Law. 2002. “Carter’s Groundbreaking Appointment of Women to the Federal Bench: His Other ‘Human Rights’ Record.”American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law11 (3): 1131–63.
21.
CromptonJ. Andrew. 2001. “Commentary: Pennsylvanians Should Adopt a Merit Selection System for State Appellate Court Judges.”Dickinson Law Review106:755.
22.
DiminoMichael R.2003. “The Futile Quest for a System of Judicial ‘Merit’ Selection.”Albany Law Review67:803–19.
23.
DolanKathleen. 2014. “Gender Stereotypes, Candidate Evaluations, and Voting for Women Candidates: What Really Matters?”Political Research Quarterly67 (1): 96–107.
24.
EastonDavid. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley.
25.
EggersAndrew C.VivyanNickWagnerMarkus. 2018. “Corruption, Accountability, and Gender: Do Female Politicians Face Higher Standards in Public Life?”The Journal of Politics80 (1): 321–26.
26.
EngstromRichard L.GilesMicheal W.1972. “Expectations and Images: A Note on Diffuse Support for Legal Institutions.”Law & Society Review6 (4): 631–36.
27.
Escobar-LemmonMariaHoekstraValerieKangAlice J.KittilsonMiki. Forthcoming. “Breaking the Judicial Glass Ceiling: The Appointment of Women to High Courts Worldwide.”The Journal of Politics. doi:10.1086/710017.
28.
EsterlingKevin M.AndersenSeth S.1999. “Diversity and the Judicial Merit Selection Process: A Statistical Report.” Research on Judicial Selection, The American Judicature Society, Chicago.
29.
FrederickBrianStrebMatthew J.2008. “Women Running for Judge: The Impact of Sex on Candidate Success in State Intermediate Appellate Court Elections.”Social Science Quarterly89 (4): 937–54.
30.
GibsonJames L.1991. “Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Compliance with Supreme Court Decisions: A Question of Causality.”Law & Society Review25 (3): 631–35.
31.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.2009. “Knowing the Supreme Court? A Reconsideration of Public Ignorance of the High Court.”The Journal of Politics71 (2): 429–41.
32.
GibsonJames L.CaldeiraGregory A.SpenceLester Kenyatta. 2005. “Why do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment.”Political Research Quarterly58 (2): 187–201.
33.
GillRebecca D.EugenisKate. 2019. “Do Voters Prefer Women Judges? Deconstructing the Competitive Advantage in State Supreme Court Elections.”State Politics & Policy Quarterly19 (4): 399–427.
34.
GinsburgRuth BaderBrillLaura W.1995. “Women in the Federal Judiciary: Three Way Pavers and the Exhilarating Change President Carter Wrought.”Fordham Law Review64:281–90.
35.
GlickHenry R.1978. “The Promise and the Performance of the Missouri Plan: Judicial Selection in the Fifty States.”University of Miami Law Review32:509.
36.
GoelzhauserGreg. 2011. “Diversifying State Supreme Courts.”Law & Society Review45 (3): 761–81.
37.
GoelzhauserGreg. 2016. Choosing State Supreme Court Justices: Merit Selection and the Consequences of Institutional Reform. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
GoelzhauserGreg. 2018b. “Does Merit Selection Work? Evidence from Commission and Gubernatorial Choices.”Journal of Law and Courts6 (1): 155–87.
40.
GoelzhauserGreg. 2019. Judicial Merit Selection: Institutional Design and Performance for State Courts. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
41.
GoelzhauserGreg. 2020. “Intersectional Representation on State Supreme Courts.” In Open-Judicial Politics, edited by SolbergRorie SpillDisascroJennifer SegalWaltenburgEric, 65–86. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
42.
GoldsteinAdam. 2006. “Judicial Selection as It Relates to Gender Equality on the Bench.”Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender13:369.
43.
HallMelinda Gann. 1992. “Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts.”The Journal of Politics54 (2): 427–46.
44.
HoekstraValerieKittilsonMiki CaulBondElizabeth Andrews. 2014. “Gender, High Courts, and Ideas about Representation in Western Europe.” In Representation: The Case of Women, edited by Escobar-LemmonMaria C.Taylor-RobinsonMichelle M., 103–17. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
HuberGregoryGordonSanford. 2004. “Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind when It Runs for Office?”American Journal of Political Science48 (2): 247–63.
46.
HurwitzMark S.LanierDrew Noble. 2003. “Explaining Judicial Diversity: The Differential Ability of Women and Minorities to Attain Seats on State Supreme and Appellate Courts.”State Politics & Policy Quarterly3 (4): 329–52.
47.
HurwitzMark S.LanierDrew Noble. 2008. “Diversity in State and Federal Appellate Courts: Change and Continuity across 20 Years.”Justice System Journal29 (1): 47–70.
48.
JonesBrian Christopher. 2012. “Drafting Proper Short Bill Titles: Do States Have the Answer Feature.”Stanford Law & Policy Review23:455.
49.
KangAlice J.KittilsonMiki CaulHoekstraValerieEscobar-LemmonMaria C.2020. “Diverse and Inclusive High Courts: A Global and Intersectional Perspective.”Politics, Groups, and Identities8:812–21.
50.
KenneySally J.2019. “Towards a Less Essentialist, More Intersectional, and Institutional Approach to Gender and Judging.”Connecticut Journal of International Law34:400–19.
51.
KrivoshaNorman. 1987. “Acquiring Judges by the Merit Selection Method: The Case for Adopting Such a Method.”Southwestern Law Journal40:15–22.
52.
LindE. AllanTylerTom R.1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Springer.
53.
MartinElaine. 1981. “Women on the Federal Bench: A Comparative Profile.”Judicature65:306–13.
54.
MauteJudith L.2000. “Selecting Justice in State Courts: The Ballot Box or the Backroom?”South Texas Law Review41:1197.
55.
MullarkyMary J.2012. “A Brief History of Women of the Colorado Supreme Court.”The Colorado Lawyer41:27–32.
56.
MurphyWalter F.TanenhausJoseph. 1967. “Public Opinion and the United States Supreme Court: Mapping of Some Prerequisites for Court Legitimation of Regime Changes.”Law & Society Review2:357–84.
57.
NejelskiPaul. 1981. “The Jeffersonian-Hamiltonian Duality: A Framework for Understanding Reforms in the Administration of Justice.”Judicature64:450–52.
58.
NelsonMichael J.GibsonJames L.2017. “U.S. Supreme Court Legitimacy: Unanswered Questions and an Agenda for Future Research.” In Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior, edited by HowardRobert M.RandazzoKirk A., 132–50. New York: Routledge.
59.
ReddickMaliaNelsonMichaelCaufieldRachel. 2010. “Examining Diversity on State Courts: How does the Judicial Selection Environment Advance—and Inhibit—Judicial Diversity.”The American Judicature Society, Chicago.
60.
ReidTraciel V.2004a. “Assessing the Impact of a Candidate’s Sex in Judicial Campaigns and Elections in North Carolina.”Justice System Journal25 (2): 183–207.
61.
ReidTraciel V.2004b. “The Competitiveness of Female Candidates in Judicial Elections: An analysis of the North Carolina Trial Court Races.”Albany Law Review67:829–42.
62.
RemicheAdelaide. 2015. “When Judging Is Power.”Journal of Law and Courts3 (1): 95–114.
63.
SchneiderMatthew. 2010. “Why Merit Selection of State Court Judges Lacks Merit.”Wayne Law Review56:609.
64.
SchultzUlrikeShawGisela. 2013. “Introduction: Gender and Judging: Overview and Synthesis.” In Gender and Judging, edited by SchultzUlrikeShawGisela, 3–47. London: Bloomsbury.
65.
SlotnickElliot E.1982. “Lowering the Bench or Raising It Higher: Affirmative Action and Judicial Selection during the Carter Administration.”Yale Law & Policy Review1:270–98.
66.
SlotnickElliot E.1984. “Judicial Selection Systems and Nomination Outcomes: Does the Process Make a Difference?”American Politics Quarterly12 (2): 225–40.
67.
SolbergRorie L. SpillBrattonKathleen A.2005. “Diversifying the Federal Bench: Presidential Patterns.”The Justice System Journal26 (2): 119–33.
68.
TylerTom R.2001. “Public Trust and Confidence in Legal Authorities: What do Majority and Minority Group Members Want from the Law and Legal Institutions?”Behavioral Sciences & the Law19 (2): 215–35.
69.
TylerTom R.2003. “Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and the Effective Rule of Law.”Crime & Justice30:283–357.
70.
TylerTom R.2006. “Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation.”Annual Review of Psychology57:375–400.
71.
TylerTom R.RasinskiKenneth. 1991. “Procedural justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular U.S. Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson.”Law & Society Review25:621–30.
72.
ValdiniMelody E.ShortellChristopher. 2016. “Women’s Representation in the Highest Courts: A Comparative Analysis of the Appointment of Female Justices.”Political Research Quarterly69 (4): 865–76.
73.
WalkerThomas G.BarrowDeborah J.1985. “The Diversification of the Federal Bench: Policy and Process Ramifications.”The Journal of Politics47 (2): 596–617.
74.
WebsterPeter D.1995. “Selection and Retention of Judges: Is There One ‘Best’ Method.”Florida State University Law Review23 (1): 1–42.
75.
WilliamsMargaret S.2007. “Women’s Representation on State Trial and Appellate Courts.”Social Science Quarterly88 (5): 1192–1204.
76.
WilliamsMargaret S.ThamesFrank C.2008. “Women’s Representation on High Courts in Advanced Industrialized Countries.”Politics & Gender4 (3): 451–71.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
