Previous research suggests that ideology, material interests, and moral values drive citizens’ preferences over foreign aid policy. Little attention has been paid to how perceptions of the international environment affect these preferences. We examine the extent to which citizens in a traditional donor country consider donor competition when deciding whether to impose aid sanctions on governments engaged in human rights violations. Employing an information experiment conducted among Japanese adults, we find that the prospect of another donor ready to act as a substitute aid-provider reduces support for the use of aid sanctions. This effect runs most strongly through a pathway privileging security concerns, and the effect is larger among respondents who have preexisting concerns about the other donor. These results highlight the way in which public desires for foreign aid to bring about material returns can hinder a government’s ability to use aid to promote good governance ends.
AlesinaAlbertoDollarDavid. 2000. “Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?”Journal of Economic Growth5 (1): 33–63. doi:10.1023/A:1009874203400.
2.
AllendoerferMichelle Giacobbe. 2017. “Who Cares about Human Rights? Public Opinion about Human Rights Foreign Policy.” Journal of Human Rights16 (4): 428–51. doi:10.1080/14754835.2015.1129603.
3.
AraiKiichiroKohnoMasaruToyodaShin. 2013. “How did the Japanese Public React to Kim Jong Il’s Death?” International Relations of Asia-Pacific13(1):125–153. doi:10.1093/irap/lcs012.
4.
BermeoSarah Blodgett. 2017. “Aid Allocation and Targeted Development in an Increasingly Connected World.” International Organization71 (4): 735–66. doi:10.1017/S0020818317000315.
5.
BodensteinThiloFaustJörg. 2017. “Who Cares? European Public Opinion on Foreign Aid and Political Conditionality.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies55 (5): 955–73. doi:10.1111/jcms.12556.
ClaessensStijnCassimonDannyVan CampenhoutBjorn. 2009. “Evidence on Changes in Aid Allocation Criteria.” The World Bank Economic Review23 (2): 185–208. doi:10.1093/wber/lhp003.
8.
CrawfordGordon. 2001. Foreign Aid and Political Reform : A Comparative Analysis of Democracy Assistance and Political Conditionality. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
9.
DietrichSimoneMurdieAmanda. 2017. “Human Rights Shaming through INGOs and Foreign Aid Delivery.” The Review of International Organizations12 (1): 95–120. doi:10.1007/s11558-015-9242-8.
10.
DreherAxelFuchsAndreas. 2015. “Rogue Aid? An Empirical Analysis of China’s Aid Allocation.” Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’économique48 (3): 988–1023. doi:10.1111/caje.12166.
11.
FindleyMichael G.LaneyBrockNielsonDaniel L.SharmanJ. C.2017. “External Validity in Parallel Global Field and Survey Experiments on Anonymous Incorporation.” The Journal of Politics79 (3): 856–72. doi:10.1086/690615.
12.
GrayPatty A.2015. “Russia as a Recruited Development Donor.” European Journal of Development Research27 (2): 273–78. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2014.34.
13.
HeinrichTobias. 2013. “When is Foreign Aid Selfish, When is it Selfless?” The Journal of Politics75(2):422–435.
14.
HeinrichTobiasKobayashiYoshiharuBryantKristin A.2016. “Public Opinion and Foreign Aid Cuts in Economic Crises.” World Development77:66–79. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.005.
15.
HeinrichTobiasKobayashiYoshiharuLongLeah. 2018. “Voters Get What They Want (When They Pay Attention): Human Rights, Policy Benefits, and Foreign Aid.” International Studies Quarterly62 (1): 195–207. doi:10.1093/isq/sqx081.
16.
HeinrichTobiasKobayashiYoshiharuPetersonTimothy M.2017. “Sanction Consequences and Citizen Support: A Survey Experiment.” Internaltional Studies Quarterly61(1):98–106.
17.
HensonSpencerLindstromJohanna. 2013. “‘A Mile Wide and an Inch Deep’ ? Understanding Public Support for Aid: The Case of the United Kingdom.” World Development42 (1): 67–75. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.07.004.
18.
ImaiKosukeKeeleLukeTingleyDustinYamamotoTeppei. 2011. “Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies.” American Political Science Review105 (4): 765–789.
19.
JainPurnendra. 2016. “Japan’s Foreign Aid: Old and New Contests.” Pacific Review29 (1): 93–113. doi:10.1080/09512748.2015.1066415.
20.
JerdénBjörnHagströmLinus. 2012. “Rethinking Japan’s China Policy: Japan as an Accommodator in the Rise of China, 1978–2011.” Journal of East Asian Studies12 (2): 215–50. doi:10.1017/S1598240800007840.
21.
KatadaS.2001. “Why Did Japan Suspend Foreign Aid to China? Japan’s Foreign Aid Decision-Making and Sources of Aid Sanction.” Social Science Japan Journal4 (1): 39–58. doi:10.1093/ssjj/4.1.39.
22.
KimHyo-sookPotterDavid M.2012. Foreign Aid Competition in Northeast Asia. Sterling: Lynne Rienner/Kumarian Press.
23.
KomiyaYoshitakaMiyagawaMariTagoAtsushi. 2018. “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: The Effect of Information Stimulus on Levels of Support for Foreign Aid and Coalition Withdrawal.” In Emerging Risks in a World of Heterogeneity, edited by TadokoroMasayukiEgashiraSusumuYamamotoKazuya, 135–55. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-7968-9_7.
24.
KrasnerStephen D.WeinsteinJeremy M.2014. “Improving Governance from the Outside In.” Annual Review of Political Science17 (1): 123–45. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-120611-231838.
25.
LumsdaineDavid Halloran. 1993. Moral Vision in International Politics : The Foreign Aid Regime, 1949-1989. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/titles/5252.html.
26.
LundborgP.1998. “Foreign Aid and International Support as a Gift Exchange.” Economics and Politics10 (2): 127–42. doi:10.1111/1468-0343.00041.
27.
MeernikJamesKruegerEric L.PoeSteven C.1998. “Testing Models of U.S. Foreign Policy: Foreign Aid during and after the Cold War.” The Journal of Politics60 (1): 63–85. doi:10.2307/2648001.
28.
MesquitaBruce Bueno deSmithAlastair. 2007. “Foreign Aid and Policy Concessions.” Journal of Conflict Resolution51 (2): 251–84. doi:10.1177/0022002706297696.
29.
MilnerHelen V.TingleyDustin. 2013. “Public Opinion and Foreign Aid: A Review Essay.” International Interactions39 (3): 389–401. doi:10.1080/03050629.2013.784090.
30.
MolenaersNadiaGagianoAnnaSmetsLodewijk. 2017. “Introducing a New Data Set: Budget Support Suspensions as a Sanctioning Device: An Overview from 1999 to 2014.” Governance30 (1): 143–52. doi:10.1111/gove.12221.
31.
MolenaersNadiaGagianoAnnaSmetsLodewijkDellepianeSebastian. 2015. “What Determines the Suspension of Budget Support?”World Development75:62–73. doi:10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2014.09.025.
32.
MorgenthauHans. 1962. “A Political Theory of Foreign Aid.” American Political Science Review56 (2): 301–09. doi:10.2307/1952366.
33.
MurdieAmandaPeksenDursun. 2013. “The Impact of Human Rights INGO Activities on Economic Sanctions.” The Review of International Organizations8 (1): 33–53. doi:10.1007/s11558-012-9146-9.
NielsenRichard A.2013. “Rewarding Human Rights? Selective Aid Sanctions against Repressive States.” International Studies Quarterly57 (4): 791–803. doi:10.1111/isqu.12049.
37.
PaxtonPamelaKnackStephen. 2012. “Individual and Country-Level Factors Affecting Support for Foreign Aid.” International Political Science Review33 (2): 171–92. doi:10.1177/0192512111406095.
38.
PeksenDursunPetersonTimothy M.DruryA. Cooper. 2014. “Media-Driven Humanitarianism? News Media Coverage of Human Rights Abuses and the Use of Economic Sanctions.” International Studies Quarterly58 (4): 855–66. doi:10.1111/isqu.12136.
39.
SchraederPeter J.HookSteven W.TaylorBruce. 1998. “Clarifying the Foreign Aid Puzzle: A Comparison of American, Japanese, French, and Swedish Aid Flows.” World Politics50 (2): 294–323. doi:10.1017/S0043887100008121.
40.
ScottoThomas J.ReiflerJasonHudsonDavidvanHeerde-HudsonJennifer. 2017. “We Spend How Much? Misperceptions, Innumeracy, and Support for the Foreign Aid in the United States and Great Britain.” Journal of Experimental Political Science4 (2): 119–28. doi:10.1017/XPS.2017.6.
41.
SteenJohanLoeysTomMoerkerkeBeatrijsVansteelandtStijn. 2017. “Medflex: An R Package for Flexible Mediation Analysis Using Natural Effect Models.” JSS Journal of Statistical Software76 (11). doi:10.18637/jss.v076.i11.
42.
SwedlundHaley J.2017. “Can Foreign Aid Donors Credibly Threaten to Suspend Aid? Evidence from a Cross-National Survey of Donor Officials.” Review of International Political Economy24 (3): 454–96. doi:10.1080/09692290.2017.1302490.
WintersMatthew S.MartinezGina. 2015. “The Role of Governance in Determining Foreign Aid Flow Composition.” World Development66:516–31. doi:10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2014.09.020.
45.
WoodsNgaire. 2008. “Whose Aid? Whose Influence? China, Emerging Donors and the Silent Revolution in Development Assistance.” International Affairs84 (6): 1205–21. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00765.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
