Nearly two-thirds of persons who receive an unsolicited ballot in the mail before Election Day choose to return their ballot in person, rather than through the less costly and more convenient U.S. Postal Service. Why? How and when voters choose to return their mail ballot is consequential to the administration of elections and the confidence voters have in the outcome of elections. We offer and test four explanations for how vote by mail voters choose to return their ballot, including the social rewards of voting, the costs of voting, trust in U.S. Postal Service and a preference to cast a ballot after campaigning ends. We find supporting evidence for each explanation conditioned by prior history of voting.
ArceneauxKevinNickersonDavid. 2009. “Who Is Mobilized to Vote? A Re-analysis of 11 Field Experiments.” American Journal of Political Science53:1–16.
4.
AtkesonLonna RaeSaundersKyle L.2007. “The Effect of Election Administration on Voter Confidence: A Local Matter?” PS: Political Science & Politics40 (4): 655–60.
5.
BarretoA. MattCohen-MarksMaraWoods.Nathan D.2009. “Are All Precincts Created Equal? The Prevalence of Low-Quality Precincts in Low-Income and Minority Communities.” Political Research Quarterly62 (2): 445–58.
6.
BerinskyAdamBurnsNancyTraugottMichael. 2001. “Who Votes by Mail? A Dynamic Model of the Individual-level Consequences of Voting-by-Mail.” Public Opinion Quarterly5:178–97.
7.
BoboLawrenceGilliamFranklin D.Jr.1990. “Race, Sociopolitical Participation and Black Empowerment.” American Political Science Review84:377–93.
8.
BurdenBarryCanonDavid T.MayerKenneth R.Moynihan.Donald P.2014. “Election Laws, Mobilization and Turnout: The Unanticipated Consequences of Election Reform.” American Journal of Political Science58 (1): 95–109.
9.
ChaffeeSteven H.RimalRajiv Nath. 1996. “Time of vote decision and openness to persuasion.” Political persuasion and attitude change267–291.
10.
DawsonMichael. 1994. “A Black Counterpublic? Economic Earthquakes, Racial Agenda(s), and Black Politics.” Public Culture7:195–223.
11.
DownsAnthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Addison Wesley.
12.
DurrandRichard M.Lambert.Zarrel V.1988. “Don’t Know Responses in Surveys: Analyses and Interpretational Consequences.” Journal of Business Research16:169–88.
13.
ElaadEitan. 2003. “Effects of Feedback on the Overestimated Capacity to Detect Lies and the Underestimated Ability to Tell Lies.” Applied Cognitive Psychology17:349–63.
FunkPatricia. 2010. “Social Incentives and Voter Turnout: Evidence from the Swiss Mail Ballot System.” Journal of the European Economic Association8 (5): 1077–103.
16.
FitzgeraldMary. 2005. “Greater Convenience But Not Greater Turnout: The Impact of Alternative Voting Methods on Electoral Participation in the United States.” American Politics Research33 (6): 842–67.
17.
GerberAlanHuberGregory A.DohertyDavidDowling.Conor M.2016. “Why People Vote: Estimating the Social Returns to Voting.” British Journal of Political Science46:241–64.
18.
GerberAlan S.GreenDonald P.Larimer.Christopher W.2008. “Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review102:33–48.
19.
GerberAlan S.HuberGregory A.DohertyDavidDowling.Conor M.2013a. “Is There a Secret Ballot? Ballot Secrecy Perceptions and Their Implications for Voting Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science43:77–102.
20.
GerberAlan S.HuberGregory A.DohertyDavidDowlingConor M.SchwartzbergNicole. 2009. “Using Battleground States as a Natural Experiment to Test Theories of Voting.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, September 3–6.
21.
GerberAlan S.HuberGregory A.HillSeth J.2013b. “Identifying the Effect of All-Mail Elections on Turnout: Staggered Reform in the Evergreen State.” Political Science Research Methods101:91–116.
22.
GronkePaulMillerPeter. 2012. “Voting by Mail and Turnout in Oregon: Revisiting Southwell and Burchett.” American Politics Research40 (6): 976–97.
23.
GilovichThomasMedvecVictoria HustedSavitskyKenneth. 2000. “The Spotlight Effect in Social Judgment: An Egocentric Bias in Estimates of the Salience of One’s Own Actions and Appearance.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology78:211–22.
24.
IyengarShantoKrupenkinMarsha. 2018. “The Strengthening of Partisan Affect.” Advances in Political Psychology39:201–18.
LaroccaRogerKlemanskiJohn S.2011. “Ú.S. State Election Reform and Turnout in Presidential Elections.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly11 (1): 76–101.
27.
LeighleyJanNaglerJonathan. 2014. Who Votes Now: Demographics, Issues, Inequality, and Turnout in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28.
LyonsWilliamSchebJohn M.II. 1999. “Early Voting and the Timing of the Vote: Unanticipated Consequences of Electoral Reform.” State and Local Government Review31:212–22.
MengerAndrewSteinRobert M.2018. “Enlisting the Public in Facilitating Election Administration: A Field Experiment.” Public Administration Review78:892–903. doi:10.1111/puar.12833.
PanagopoulosCostas. 2010. “Affect, Social Pressure and Prosocial Motivation: Field Experimental Evidence of the Mobilizing Effects of Pride, Shame and Publicizing Voting Behavior.” Political Behavior32:369–86.
RicheySean. 2008. “Voting by Mail: Turnout and Institutional Reform Oregon.” Social Science Quarterly89 (4): 902–15.
37.
RikerWilliamOrdeshookPeter. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review6:225–43.
38.
RosenstoneSteven J.HansenJohn Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in American. New York: MacMillan.
39.
SancesMichealStewartCharlesIII. 2015. “Partisanship and Confidence in the Vote Count: Evidence from U.S. National Elections Since 2000.” Electoral Studies40:176–88.
40.
SouthwellPriscilla L.BurchettJustin I.2000. “The Effect of All-Mail Elections on Voter Turnout.” American Politics Research281:72–79.
41.
SteinRobertStewartCharlesIIIMannChristopherBirenbaumZacharyFungAnsonGreenbergJedKawsarFarhanAlberdaGayleAlvarezR. MichaelAtkesonLonna, et al. 2019. “Waiting to Vote in the 2016 Presidential Election: Evidence from a Multi-jurisdiction Study.” Political Research Quarterly. Published electronically March 28. doi:10.1177/1065912919832374.
42.
SteinRobert M.1998. “Early Voting.” Public Opinion Quarterly62:57–69.
43.
TomzMichaelWittenbergJasonKingGary. 2003. “CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results.” https://gking.harvard.edu/clarify
44.
UhlanerCarole J.1989. “Rational Turnout: The Neglected Role of Groups.” American Journal of Political Science33:390–422.
ZallerJohn2004. “Floating Voters in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1948-2000.” In Studies in Public Opinion, edited by SnidermanPaul M.SarisWillem E., 166–212. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
