“Education,” notes Philip Converse, “is everywhere the universal solvent.” Whatever the ill of the body politic, many believe that greater education improves the condition. Much scholarship explores the impact of education on political attitudes and behaviors, but scholars have not examined the relationship of education to support for political compromise. This is especially topical, as compromise between parties seems harder than ever to achieve, yet compromise is necessary for democratic governance. We examine whether higher levels of education lead to support for compromise and find that education does matter, but the relationship is conditional. For liberals and moderates, more education promotes greater support for compromise. For conservatives, those with more education are not more likely to support compromise than those with less education. We argue that for conservatives, education matters for compromise support, but it also leads to better understanding of bedrock ideological principles that inhibit approval of compromise.
AbramowitzAlan I.2013. The Polarized Public? Why Our Government Is So Dysfunctional. New York: Pearson.
2.
AbramowitzAlan I.2018. The Great Alignment: Race, Party Transformation, and the Rise of Donald Trump. New Haven: Yale University Press.
3.
AbramsSamuel J.FiorinaMorris P. 2015. “Party Sorting: The Foundations of Polarized Politics.” In American Gridlock: The Sources, Character, and Impact of Political Polarization, edited by ThurberJames A.YoshinakaAntoine, 113–29. New York: Cambridge University Press.
BerelsonBernardLazarsfeldPaulMcPheeWilliam. 1954. Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Election. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
BerinskyAdam J.2017. “Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation.” British Journal of Political Science47 (2): 241–62. doi:10.1017/S0007123415000186.
13.
BerryJeffrey M.SobierajSarah. 2014. The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility. New York: Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=-co8BAAAQBAJ.
CampbellAngusConversePhillipMillerWarrenStokesDonald. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
CarneyDana R.JostJohn T.GoslingSamuel D.PotterJeff. 2008. “The Secret Lives of Liberals and Conservatives: Personality Profiles, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave behind.” Political Psychology29 (6): 807–40. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x.
17.
Delli CarpiniMichael X.KeeterScott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
18.
CasselCarol A.HillDavid B. 1981. “Explanations of Turnout Decline: A Multivariate Test.” American Politics Quarterly9 (2): 181–95. doi:10.1177/1532673X8100900203.
19.
ConversePhilip. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by ApterDavid, 206–61. London: Free Press.
20.
ConversePhilip. 1972. “Change in the American Electorate.” In The Human Meaning of Social Change, edited by CampbellAngusConversePhilip, 263–338. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
21.
DavisNicholas T.2018. “Identity Sorting and Political Compromise.” American Politics Research47:391–414. doi:10.1177/1532673X18799273.
EaglyAlice H.Johannesen-SchmidtMary C.van EngenMarloes L. 2003. “Tranformational, Transactional, and Laissez-Faire Leadership Styles: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Women and Men.” Psychological Bulletin129 (4): 569–91. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2003-06077-007.
24.
EllisChristopherStimsonJames A. 2012. Ideology in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
FisherRogerUryWilliamPattonBruce. 1991. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving in. New York: Penguin Books.
29.
Gallup Organization. 2013. Gallup News Service Poll: June Wave 1–Confidence in Institutions and Leaders/IRS Targeting [dataset]. USAIPOGNS2013-07. Gallup Organization [producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, RoperExpress [distributor].
30.
GlaserJames M.BerryJeffrey M. 2018. “Compromising Positions: Why Republican Partisans Are More Rigid than Democrats.” Political Science Quarterly133 (1): 99–126.
31.
GrahamJesseHaidtJonathanNosekBrian A. 2009. “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96 (5): 1029–46.
32.
GutmannAmyThompsonDennis Frank. 2014. The Spirit of Compromise: Why Governing Demands It and Campaigning Undermines It. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=UASjAgAAQBAJ.
33.
HibbingJohnTheiss-MorseElizabeth. 1996. Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes toward American Political Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
HibbingJohnTheiss-MorseElizabeth. 2002. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
35.
HibbingJohnTheiss-MorseElizabethWhitakerEric. 2009. “Americans’ Perceptions of the Nature of Governing.” In Fault Lines: Why the Republicans Lost Congress, edited by MondakJeffery J.MitchellDona-Gene, 148–65. New York: Routledge.
36.
HillygusD. Sunshine. 2005. “The Missing Link: Exploring the Relationship between Higher Education and Political Engagement.” Political Behavior27 (1): 25–47. doi:10.1007/s11109-005-3075-8.
37.
HuddyLeonieMasonLillianaAarøeLene. 2015. “Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity.” American Political Science Review109 (1): 1–17. http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0003055414000604.
IyengarShantoSoodGauravLelkesYphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly76 (3): 405–31. http://poq.oxfordjournals.org/content/76/3/405.short.
JostJohn T.GlaserJackKruglanskiArie W.SullowayFrank J. 2003. “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin129 (3): 339–75. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2003-00782-003.
42.
KahnemanDanielTverskyAmos. 1984. “Choices, Values, and Frames.” American Psychologist39 (4): 341–50. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341.
43.
KamCindy D.PalmerCarl L. 2008. “Reconsidering the Effects of Education on Political Participation.” The Journal of Politics70 (3): 612–31. doi:10.1017/S0022381608080651.
44.
KsiazekThomas B.MalthouseEdward C.WebsterJames G. 2010. “News-Seekers and Avoiders: Exploring Patterns of Total News Consumption across Media and the Relationship to Civic Participation.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media54 (4): 551–68. doi:10.1080/08838151.2010.519808.
McCloskyHerbert. 1958. “Conservatism and Personality.” American Political Science Review52 (1): 27–45.
53.
MusaDonaldSchulzRichardHarrisRoderickSilvermanMyrnaThomasStephen B. 2009. “Trust in the Health Care System and the Use of Preventive Health Services by Older Black and White Adults.” American Journal of Public Health99 (7): 1293–99. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2007.123927.
Pew Research Center fo. Pew Research Center. 2014. 2014 Political Typology/Polarization Survey [dataset]. USPEW2014-TYPO, Version 2. Abt SRBI, Inc. (Schulman, Ronca, & Bucuvalas, Inc.) [producer]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, RoperExpress [distributor].
PriorMarkus. 2005. “News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science49 (3): 577–92. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00143.x.
65.
PutnamRobert D.2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
66.
RolfeMeredith. 2012. Voter Turnout: A Social Theory of Political Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
RosenstoneStevenHansenJohn Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
69.
SemetkoHolli A.ValkenburgPatti M. 1998. “The Impact of Attentiveness on Political Efficacy: Evidence from a Three-Year German Panel Study.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research10 (3): 195–210. doi:10.1093/ijpor/10.3.195.
70.
SnidermanPaul M.GlaserJames M.GriffinRobert. 1990. “Information and Electoral Choice.” In Information and Democratic Processes, edited by FerejohnJohnKuklinskiJames H., 164–78. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
ZallerJohn. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
