A growing body of research in political science is influenced by conceptual advances in socialization theory which posit that children can influence adults’ learning across a wide range of topics. The concept of bidirectional influence describes socialization led by one’s parents and children. One outstanding need in the effort to import this concept to political socialization research is a measure that captures the influence of both parents and children. We meet this need with a measure of relative influence from both parents and children as sources for political learning. We provide evidence of measurement validity using separate samples of Asians, Blacks, Latinos, and Whites. Our findings suggest that our metric is portable across groups, and that the range of what individuals recall about their familial socialization experience includes more child-to-parent influence than existing studies suggest.
AdcockRobertCollierDavid. 2001. “Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research.” American Political Science Review95 (3): 529–46.
2.
BarretoMattFrasure-YokleyLorrieVargasEdward d.WongJanelle. 2017. “The Collaborative Multiracial Post-election Survey.” CMPS. Los Angeles, CA.
3.
BartelsLarry M.JackmanSimon. 2014. “A Generational Model of Political Learning.” Electoral Studies33:7–18.
4.
BellRichard Q.1968. “A Reinterpretation of the Direction of Effects in Studies of Socialization.” Psychological Review75:81–95.
5.
BloemraadIrene. 2006. Becoming a Citizen: Incorporating Immigrants and Refugees in the United States and Canada. California: University of California Press.
6.
BloemraadIreneTrostChristine. 2008. “It’s a Family Affair Intergenerational Mobilization in the Spring 2006 Protests.” American Behavioral Scientist52 (4): 507–32.
7.
BradyHenry E.VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay Lehman. 1995. “Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation.” American Political Science Review89 (2): 271–94.
8.
DavidovMaayanKnafo-NoamArielSerbinLisa A.MosscEllen. 2015. “The Influential Child: How Children Affect their Environment and Influence Their Own Risk and Resilience.” Development and Psychopathology27:947–51.
9.
EastonDavid. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley.
10.
FlanaganConstance A.2004. “Volunteerism, Leadership, Political Socialization, and Civic Engagement.” In Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, edited by Richard M. Lerner, and Laurence Steinberg, 721–45. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
11.
Garcia-CastanonMarcela.2013. “Theory of Multi-tiered Membership.” PhD diss.
12.
GidengilElisabethWassHannaValasteMaria. 2016. “Political Socialization and Voting: The Parent-Child Link in Turnout.” Political Research Quarterly69 (2): 373–83.
13.
GimpelJames G.LayJ. Celeste. 2005. “Party Identification, Local Partisan Contexts, and the Acquisition of Participatory Attitudes.” In The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior, edited by ZuckermanAlan S., 209. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
14.
GordonMilton M.1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion and National Origins. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HillKim QuaileHannaStephenShafqatSahar. 1997. “The Liberal-Conservative Ideology of U.S. Senators: A New Measure.” American Journal of Political Science41 (4): 1395–1413.
17.
HillKim QuaileHurleyPatricia. 1999. “Dyadic Representation Reappraised.” American Journal of Political Science43:109–37.
18.
HuntingtonSamuel P.2004. Who Are We: The Challenges to America’s National Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
19.
HymanHerbert. 1959. Political Socialization. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
20.
JenningsM. Kent. 1981. Generations and Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
21.
JenningsM. KentNiemiRichard G.1974. The Political Character of Adolescence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
22.
JenningsM. KentNiemiRichard G.2015. Political Character of Adolescence: The Influence of Families and Schools. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23.
JenningsM. KentStokerLauraBowersJake. 2009. “Politics across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined.” The Journal of Politics71 (3): 782–99.
24.
JeritJenniferBarabasJasonBolsenToby. 2006. “Citizens, Knowledge, and the Information Environment.” American Journal of Political Science50 (2): 266–82.
25.
KibriaNazli. 1993. Family Tightrope: The Changing Lives of Vietnamese Americans. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26.
KingGaryKeohaneRobert O.VerbaSidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27.
KnafoArielGalanskyNeta. 2008. “The Influence of Children on Their Parents’ Values.” Social & Personality Psychology Compass2 (3): 1143–61.
28.
McDevittMichaelButlerMary. 2011. “Latino Youth as Information Leaders: Implications for Family Interaction and Civic Engagement in Immigrant Communities.” Journal of Information and Education Studies7 (2): 1–27.
29.
McDevittMichaelChaffeeSteven. 2000. “Closing Gaps in Political Communication and Knowledge Effects of a School Intervention.” Communication Research27 (3): 259–92.
30.
McDevittMichaelChaffeeSteven. 2002. “From Top-down to Trickle-up Influence: Re- visiting Assumptions about the Family in Political Socialization.” Political Communication19 (3): 281–301.
31.
MolaJan DeBuyssebAnn. 2008. “The Phenomenology of Children’s Influence on Parents.” Journal of Family Therapy30 (2): 163–193.
32.
NiemiRichard G.HepburnMary A.1995. “The Rebirth of Political Socialization.” Perspectives on Political Science24:17–16.
33.
OjedaChristopherHatemiPeter K.2015. “Accounting for the Child in the Transmission of Party Identification.” American Sociological Review80 (6): 1150–74.
34.
OrellanaMarjorie F.2001. “The Work Kids Do: Mexican and Central American Immigrant Children’s Contributions to Households and Schools in California.” Harvard Educational Review71:366–89
35.
PachecoJulianna SandellPlutzerEric. 2008. “Political Participation and Cumulative Disadvantage: The Impact of Economic and Social Hardship on Young Citizens.” Journal of Social Issues64 (3): 571–93.
36.
PaschallKatherine W.MastergeorgeAnn M.2016. “A Review of 25 Years of Research in Bi-directionality in Parent-Child Relationships: An Examination of Methodological Approaches.” International Journal of Behavioral Development40 (5): 442–51.
37.
PortesAlejandroRumbautRuben G.2001. Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
RosenstoneSteven J.HansenJohn Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. London: Longman.
39.
SearingDonald D.SchwartzJoel J.LindAlden E.1973. “The Structuring Principle: Political Socialization and Belief Systems.” American Political Science Review67 (2): 415–32.
40.
SearsDavid O.BrownC.2013. “Political Development.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, edited by HuddyLeonieSearsDavid O.LevyJack S., 59–95. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
SearsDavid O.ValentinoNicholas A.1997. “Politics Matters: Political Events as Catalysts for Pre-adult Socialization.” American Political Science Review91 (1): 45–65.
42.
SigelRoberta S.1995. “Intergenerational Family Relations, Civic Organisations, and the Political Socialisation of Second-Generation Immigrant Youth.” Perspectives on Political Science24 (1): 1–10.
43.
StinchcombeArthur L.1968. Constructing Social Theories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44.
StokerLauraBassJackie. 2011. “Political Socialization: Ongoing Questions and New Directions.” In The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media, edited by ShapiroRobert Y.JacobsLawrence R., 453–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
45.
TerriquezVeronica. 2011. “Schools for Democracy: Labor Union Participation and Latino Immigrant Parents School-based Civic Engagement.” American Sociological Review76 (4): 581–601.
46.
TerriquezVeronicaKwonHyeyoung. 2015. “Intergenerational Family Relations, Civic Organisations, and the Political Socialisation of Second-Generation Immigrant Youth.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies41 (3): 425–47.
47.
TsengVivian. 2004. “Family Interdependence and Academic Adjustment in College: Youth from Immigrant and US-born Families.” Child Development75 (3): 966–83.
48.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKayBurnsNancy. 2005. “Family Ties: Understanding the Intergenerational Transmission of Political Participation.” In The Social Logic of Politics, edited by ZuckermanAlan S., 95–114. Philadelphia: Temple University.
49.
VerbaSidneySchlozmanKay LehmanBradyHenry E.1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
50.
WatersMary C.1990. Ethnic Options: Choosing Identities in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
51.
WestheimerJoelKahneJoseph. 2004. “Educating the Good Citizen: Political Choices and Pedagogical Goals.” PS: Political Science & Politics37 (2): 241–47.
52.
WongJanelleTsengVivian. 2008. “Political Socialisation in Immigrant Families: Challenging Top-down Parental Socialisation Models.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies34 (1): 151–68.
53.
ZongJieBatalovaJeanne. 2017. “Frequently Requested Statistics on Immigrants and Immigration in the United States.” Migration Policy Institute26:1–18.
54.
ZuckermanAlan S.DasovicJosipFitzgeraldJennifer. 2007. Partisan Families: The Social Logic of Bounded Partisanship in Germany and Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
