In 2011, South Carolina passed a government-issued photo identification (ID) statute. We examine the effects of this law on overall turnout, as well as for minority turnout in particular. A series of difference-in-difference tests are specified using individual-level population data on registrants with and without ID, comparing the 2010 (pre-implementation) and 2014 (post-implementation) election cycles. The results of our analysis indicate that the voter ID statute did dampen overall turnout. These findings comport with recent scholarship which has found evidence that voter ID laws can lower turnout rates. The size of the effect, however, is quite diminutive. We estimate that initial implementation of the South Carolina statute decreased turnout in the 2014 general election by 0.19 percent. In addition, the evidence gathered on the question of racial effects indicates that there is no discernible racial impact from the state’s voter ID law.
AlvarezR. MichaelBaileyDeliaKatzJonathan. 2010. “The Effect of Voter Identification Laws on Turnout.” Political Analysis15 (4): 446–64.
4.
AngristJoshua D.PischkeJorn-Steffen. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
5.
AnsolabehereStephen. 2009. “Effects of Identification Requirements on Voting: Evidence from the Experiences of Voters on Election Day.” PS: Political Science & Politics42:127–30.
6.
AnsolabehereStephenHershEitan. 2012. “What Big Data Reveal about Survey Misreporting and the Real Electorate.” Political Analysis20 (4): 437–59.
7.
AnsolabehereStephenHershEitan. 2014. “Voter Registration: The Process and Quality of Lists.” In The Measure of American Elections, edited by BurdenBarry C.StewartCharlesIII, 61–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BarretoMatt A.NuñoStephen A.SanchezGabriel R.2009. “The Disproportionate Impact of Voter-ID Requirement son the Electorate—New Evidence from Indiana.” PS: Political Science & Politics42:111–16.
BrightChelsie L. M.LynchMichael S.2017. “Kansas Voter ID Laws: Advertising and Its Effects on Turnout.” Political Research Quarterly70 (2): 340–47.
11.
BurdenBarry C.CanonDavid T.MayerKenneth R.MoynihanDonald P.2014. “Election Laws, Mobilization, and Turnout: The Unanticipated Consequences of Election Reform.” American Journal of Political Science58:95–109.
12.
BurdenBarry C.NeiheiselJacob R.2013. “Election Administration and the Pure Effect of Voter Registration on Turnout.” Political Research Quarterly66 (1): 77–90.
13.
CitrinJackGreenDonald P.LevyMorris. 2014. “The Effects of Voter ID Notification on Voter Turnout: Results from a Large-Scale Field Experiment.” Election Law Journal15 (2): 228–42.
14.
Commission on Federal Election Reform. 2005. Report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform. Washington, DC: Center for Democracy and Election Management, American University.
15.
DownsAnthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
16.
EriksonRobert S.MinniteLorraine C.2009. “Modeling Problems in the Voter Identification—Voter Turnout Debate.” Election Law Journal8 (2): 85–101.
17.
GerberAlan S.HuberGregory A.MeredityMarcBiggersDaniel R.HendryDavid J.2017. “Does Incarceration Reduce Voting? Evidence about the Political Consequences of Spending Time in Prison.” Journal of Politics79 (4): 1130–46.
18.
GillespieJune Andra. 2015. “Voter Identification and Black Voter Turnout, An Examination of Black Voter Turnout Patterns in Georgia, 2000-2014.” Phylon52(2): 43–67.
19.
GronkePaulHicksWilliam D.McKeeSeth C.StewartCharlesIIIDunhamJames. 2019. “Voter ID Laws: A View from the Public.” Social Science Quarterly100 (1): 215–32.
20.
HajnalZoltanLajevardiNazitaNielsonLindsay. 2017. “Voter Identification Laws and the Suppression of Minority Votes.” Journal of Politics79 (2): 363–79.
21.
HanmerMichael J.KalkanKerem Ozan. 2013. “Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models.” American Journal of Political Science57 (1): 263–77.
22.
HicksWilliam D.McKeeSeth C.SellersMitchell D.SmithDaniel A.2015. “A Principle or a Strategy? Voter Identification Laws and Partisan Competition in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly68 (1): 18–33.
23.
HicksWilliam D.McKeeSeth C.SmithDaniel A.2016. “The Determinants of State Legislator Support for Restrictive Voter ID Laws.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly16 (4): 411–31.
24.
HightonBenjamin. 2017. “Voter Identification Laws and Turnout in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science20:149–67.
25.
HoodM. V.IIIBullockCharles S.III. 2008. “Worth a Thousand Words? An Analysis of Georgia’s Voter Identification Statute.” American Politics Research36:555–79.
26.
HoodM. V.IIIBullockCharles S.III. 2012. “Much Ado about Nothing? An Empirical Assessment of the Georgia Voter ID Statute.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly12:394–414.
27.
HopkinsDaniel J.MeredithMarcMorseMichaelSmithSarahYoderJesse. 2017. “Voting but for the Law: Evidence from Virginia on Photo Identification Requirements.” Journal of Legal Studies14 (1): 79–128.
28.
KandkerShahidur R.KoolwalGayatri B.SamadHussain A.2010. Handbook on Impact Evaluation, Quantitative Methods and Practices. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
29.
LeighleyJan E.NaglerJonathan. 2014. Who Votes Now?Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McKeeSeth C.2015. “Politics Is Local: State Legislator Voting on Restrictive Voter Identification Legislation.” Research & Politics. Published electronically July 1. doi:10.1177/2053168015589804.
32.
MohrLawrence B.1995. Impact Analysis for Program Evaluation. 2nd ed.Washington, DC: SAGE.
33.
MycoffJason D.WagnerMichael W.WilsonDavid C.2009. “The Empirical Effects of Voter-ID Laws: Present or Absent?” PS: Political Science and Politics42(1): 121–126.
RochaRene R.MatsubayashiTetsuya. 2014. “The Politics of Race and Voter ID Laws in the States: The Return of Jim Crow?” Political Research Quarterly67 (3): 666–79.
36.
RosenstoneSteven J.HansenJohn Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
37.
StewartCharlesIII. 2013. “Voter ID: Who Has Them? Who Shows Them?” Oklahoma Law Review66:21–52.
38.
StewartCharlesIII. 2014. “What Hath HAVA Wrought? Consequences, Intended and not, of the Post-Bush v. Gore Reforms.” In Election Administration in the United States, edited by AlvarezR. MichaelGrofmanBernard, 79–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
ValentinoNicholas A.NeunerFabian G.2017. “Why the Sky Didn’t Fall: Mobilizing Anger in Reaction to Voter ID Laws.” Political Psychology38:331–50.
40.
VercellottiTimothyAndersonDavid. 2009. “Voter-Identification Requirements and the Learning Curve.” PS: Political Science & Politics42:117–20.
41.
WolfingerRaymond E.RosenstoneSteven J.1980. Who Votes?New Haven: Yale University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
