Do women candidates in the United States more openly provide the specific details of their policy preferences and make clear their political ideology? Previous research supports all manner of conflicting expectations regarding gender and campaign communication strategies. Here, with an eye toward offering evidence on the degree to which candidates make clear their issue positions, we consider how more than 1,300 candidates running in the 2016 elections from fifteen randomly chosen states answered voter guide questions. We do so both to better understand the murky theoretical relationship between gender and communication styles and to offer insight into the practical realities of how women run for office. Ultimately our findings support the notion that women run for office differently, offering less transparency of their issue positions than men. The implication, consistent with a theory of conditional political ambition, is that women weigh more seriously the decision to run for office and, thus, run more sophisticated campaigns when they do pursue office.
AllenPeterCuttsDavid. 2017. “Aspirant Candidate Behaviour and Progressive Political Ambition.” Research & Politics4:1–9.
2.
AnastasopoulosLefteris. 2016. “Estimating the Gender Penalty in House of Representative Elections Using a Regression Discontinuity Design.” Electoral Studies43:150–57.
3.
AnziaSarah F.BerryChristopher R.2011. “The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen?” American Journal of Political Science55 (3): 478–93.
4.
BanwartMary ChristineMcKinneyMitchell S.2005. “A Gendered Influence in Campaign Debates? Analysis of Mixed-Gender United States Senate and Gubernatorial Debates.” Communication Studies56 (4): 353–73.
5.
BarnesTiffany D.BrantonRegina P.CasseseErin C.2017. “A Reexamination of Women’s Electoral Success in Open Seat Elections: The Conditioning Effect of Electoral Competition.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy38 (3): 298–317.
6.
BarrettEdith J.1995. “The Policy Priorities of African American Women in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly20:223–47.
7.
BauerNichole M.2018. “Running Local: Gender Stereotyping and Female Candidates in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review. Published electronically April 30. doi:10.1177/1078087418770807.
8.
BilousFrances R.KraussRobert M.1988. “Dominance and Accommodation in the Conversational Behaviours of Same-and Mixed-Gender Dyads.” Language & Communication8 (3/4): 183–94.
9.
BlauFrancine D.KahnLawrence M.2017. “The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations.” Journal of Economic Literature55 (3): 789–865.
10.
BledsoeTimothyHerringMary. 1990. “Victims of Circumstances: Women in Pursuit of Political Office.” American Political Science Review84 (1): 213–23.
11.
BlighMichelle C.KohlesJeffrey C.2008. “Negotiating Gender Role Expectations: Rhetorical Leadership and Women in the US Senate.” Leadership4 (4): 381–402.
12.
BullockCharles S.MacManusSusan A.OwenKaren PadgettPenberthyCorttney C.ReidRalph O.McPheeBrian. 2014. “‘Your Honor’ Is a Female: A Multistage Electoral Analysis of Women’s Successes at Securing State Trial Court Judgeships.” Social Science Quarterly95 (5): 1322–45.
13.
ByrnesJames P.MillerDavid C.SchaferWilliam D.1999. “Gender Differences in Risk Taking: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin125 (3): 367–83.
14.
BystromDianneKaidLynda Lee. 2002. “Are Women Candidates Transforming Campaign Communication.” In Women Transforming Congress, Vol. 4, 146–69. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
15.
CheungHo KwanLindseyAlexKingEdenHeblMichelle R.2016. “Beyond Sex: Exploring the Effects of Femininity and Masculinity on Women’s Use of Influence Tactics.” Gender in Management: An International Journal31 (1): 43–60.
16.
ConversePhilip E.2006. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics (1964).” Critical Review18 (1–3): 1–74.
17.
DindiaKathrynAllenMike. 1992. “Sex Differences in Self-Disclosure: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin112 (1): 106–24.
18.
DolanKathleen. 2005. “Do Women Candidates Play to Gender Stereotypes? Do Men Candidates Play to Women? Candidate Sex and Issues Priorities on Campaign Websites.” Political Research Quarterly58 (1): 31–44.
19.
DolanKathleenLynchTimothy. 2017. “Do Candidates Run as Women and Men or Democrats and Republicans? The Impact of Party and Sex on Issue Campaigns.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy38 (4): 522–46.
20.
DolezalMartin. 2015. “Online Campaigning by Austrian Political Candidates: Determinants of Using Personal Websites, Facebook, and Twitter.” Policy & Internet7 (1): 103–19.
21.
DowBonnie J.TonnMari Boor. 1993. “‘Feminine style’ and Political Judgment in the Rhetoric of Ann Richards.” Quarterly Journal of Speech79 (3): 286–302.
22.
DruckmanJames N.KiferMartin J.ParkinMichael. 2009. “Campaign Communications in US Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review103 (3): 343–66.
23.
DruckmanJames N.KiferMartin J.ParkinMichael. 2014. “U.S. Congressional Campaign Communications in an Internet Age.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties24 (1): 20–44.
24.
EaglyAlice H.JohnsonBlair T.1990. “Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin108 (2): 233–56.
FoxRichard L.LawlessJennifer L.2011. “Gendered Perceptions and Political Candidacies: A Central Barrier to Women’s Equality in Electoral Politics.” American Journal of Political Science55 (1): 59–73.
27.
FoxRichard L.LawlessJennifer L.FeeleyCourtney. 2001. “Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” Legislative Studies Quarterly26:411–35.
FultonSarah A.2012. “Running Backwards and in High Heels: The Gendered Quality Gap and Incumbent Electoral Success.” Political Research Quarterly65:2303–14.
30.
FultonSarah A.2014. “When Gender Matters: Macro-dynamics and Micro-mechanisms.” Political Behavior36 (3): 605–30.
31.
GosnellHarold Foote. 1927. Getting Out the Vote. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
HallOliver. 2005. “Death by a Thousand Signatures: The Rise of Restrictive Ballot Access Laws and the Decline of Electoral Competition in the United States.” Seattle University Law Review29:407–48.
33.
HerrnsonPaul S.2009. “The Roles of Party Organizations, Party-Connected Committees, and Party Allies in Elections.” The Journal of Politics71:41207–24.
34.
HerrnsonPaul S.LayJ. CelesteStokesAtiya Kai. 2003. “Women Running ‘as Women’: Candidate Gender, Campaign Issues, and Voter-Targeting Strategies.” The Journal of Politics65 (1): 244–55.
35.
HerrnsonPaul S.Stokes-BrownAtiya KaiHindmanMatthew. 2007. “Campaign Politics and the Digital Divide: Constituency Characteristics, Strategic Considerations, and Candidate Internet Use in State Legislative Elections.” Political Research Quarterly60 (1): 31–42.
36.
HojatMohammadrezaGonnellaJoseph S.NascaThomas J.MangioneSalvatoreVergareMichaelMageeMichael. 2002. “Physician Empathy: Definition, Components, Measurement, and Relationship to Gender and Specialty.” American Journal of Psychiatry159 (9): 1563–69.
37.
HuddyLeonieTerkildsenNayda. 1993. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotypes for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly46 (3): 503–25.
38.
KahnKim Fridkin. 1993. “Gender Differences in Campaign Messages: The Political Advertisements of Men and Women Candidates for US Senate.” Political Research Quarterly46 (3): 481–502.
39.
KanthakKristinWoonJonathan. 2015. “Women Don’t Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry.” American Journal of Political Science59 (3): 595–612.
40.
KrookMona Lena. 2010. “Why Are Fewer Women than Men Elected? Gender and the Dynamics of Candidate Selection.” Political Studies Review8 (2): 155–68.
41.
KrosnickJon A.1990. “Government Policy and Citizen Passion: A Study of Issue Publics in Contemporary America.” Political Behavior12 (1): 59–92.
42.
LarsonStephanie Greco. 2001. “‘Running as Women’? A Comparison of Female and Male Pennsylvania Assembly Candidates’ Campaign Brochures.” Women & Politics22 (2): 107–24.
43.
LawlessJenniferFoxRichard L.2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
MaestasCherie D.FultonSarahMaiselL. SandyStoneWalter J.2006. “When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the US House.” American Political Science Review100 (2): 195–208.
45.
MarcinkowskiFrankMetagJulia. 2014. “An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics11 (2): 151–68.
46.
McGranahanDavidWojanTimothy. 2007. “Recasting the Creative Class to Examine Growth Processes in Rural and Urban Counties.” Regional Studies41 (2): 197–216.
McKnightR. NealSchaeferRoger C.JohnsonCharles A.1978. “Choosing Judges: Do the Voters Know What They’re Doing.” Judicature62:94–99.
49.
MedvicStephen K.LenartSilvo. 1997. “The Influence of Political Consultants in the 1992 Congressional Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly22:61–77.
50.
MeeksLindsey. 2013. “He Wrote, She Wrote: Journalist Gender, Political Office, and Campaign News.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly90 (1): 58–74.
51.
NamyLaura L.NygaardLynne C.SauerteigDenise. 2002. “Gender Differences in Vocal Accommodation: The Role of Perception.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology21 (4): 422–32.
52.
NivenDavid. 1998. The Missing Majority: The Recruitment of Women as State Legislative Candidates. Westport: Praeger.
53.
OndercinHeather L.WelchSusan. 2009. “Comparing Predictors of Women’s Congressional Election Success: Candidates, Primaries, and the General Election.” American Politics Research37 (4): 593–613.
54.
PalmerBarbaraSimonDennis. 2003. “Political Ambition and Women in the US House of Representatives, 1916–2000.” Political Research Quarterly56 (2): 127–38.
55.
PanagopoulosCostas. 2004. “Boy Talk/Girl Talk: Gender Differences in Campaign Communications Strategies.” Women & Politics26 (3–4): 131–55.
56.
PearsonKathrynMcGheeEric. 2013. “What It Takes to Win: Questioning ‘gender Neutral’ Outcomes in US House Elections.” Politics & Gender9 (4): 439–62.
57.
PetronioSandraMartinJudith N.1986. “Ramifications of Revealing Private Information: A Gender Gap.” Journal of Clinical Psychology42 (3): 499–506.
58.
PlasserFritz. 2000. “American Campaign Techniques Worldwide.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics5 (4): 33–54.
59.
PreeceJessicaStoddardOlga. 2015. “Why Women Don’t Run: Experimental Evidence on Gender Differences in Political Competition Aversion.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization117:296–308.
60.
PreeceJessica Robinson. 2016. “Mind the Gender Gap: An Experiment on the Influence of Self-efficacy on Political Interest.” Politics & Gender12 (1): 198–217.
61.
PruysersScottBlaisJulie. 2017. “Why Won’t Lola Run? An Experiment Examining Stereotype Threat and Political Ambition.” Politics & Gender13 (2): 232–52.
62.
PruysersScottBlaisJulie. 2018. “A Little Encouragement Goes a (Not So) Long Way: An Experiment to Increase Political Ambition.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy39 (3): 384–95.
63.
PullenAlisonVachhaniSheena J.2018. “Examining the Politics of Gendered Difference in Feminine Leadership: The Absence of ‘Female Masculinity.’” In Inclusive Leadership, edited by AdapaSujanaSheridanAlison, 125–49. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
64.
SapiroVirginiaWalshKatherine CramerStrachPatriciaHenningsValerie. 2011. “Gender, Context, and Television Advertising: A Comprehensive Analysis of 2000 and 2002 House Races.” Political Research Quarterly64 (1): 107–19.
65.
SmithEric R. A. N.FoxRichard L.2001. “The Electoral Fortunes of Women Candidates for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly54 (1): 205–21.
66.
SteinRobert M.1990. “Economic Voting for Governor and US Senator: The Electoral Consequences of Federalism.” The Journal of Politics52 (1): 29–53.
67.
ThomsonRobMurachverTamarGreenJames. 2001. “Where Is the Gender in Gendered Language?” Psychological Science12 (2): 171–75.
68.
TomzMichaelVan HouwelingRobert P.2009. “The Electoral Implications of Candidate Ambiguity.” American Political Science Review103 (1): 83–98.
69.
TrucotteJasonPaulNewly. 2015. “A Case of More Is Less: The Role of Gender in U.S. Presidential Debates.” Political Research Quarterly68 (4): 773–84.
70.
ValentinoNicholas A.SearsDavid O.2005. “Old Times There Are Not Forgotten: Race and Partisan Realignment in the Contemporary South.” American Journal of Political Science49 (3): 672–88.
71.
WagnerKevin M.GainousJasonHolmanMirya R.2017. “I am Woman, Hear Me Tweet! Gender Differences in Twitter Use among Congressional Candidates.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy38 (4): 430–55.
72.
WeissEdmond H.FisherBronwyn. 1998. “Should We Teach Women to Interrupt? Cultural Variables in Management Communication Courses.” Women in Management Review13 (1): 37–44.
73.
WrightGerald C.BerkmanMichael B.1986. “Candidates and Policy in United States Senate Elections.” American Political Science Review80 (2): 567–88.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
