News media play a key role in communicating information about political parties to the American public. However, our understanding of how media depict relations between elites and the broader party coalitions remains limited. Moreover, while research suggests that forced exposure to such information can affect political attitudes, it remains unclear whether citizens are willing to selectively expose themselves to such communications. To address these two interrelated questions, this study first employs a content analysis to explore patterns in news coverage of inter- and intra-party relations throughout the Obama presidency. Next, two survey experiments investigate the degree to which such relations affect citizens’ self-exposure to such information. Taken together, the analyses uncover two important asymmetries. First, throughout Obama’s presidency, mass media depicted a Republican coalition virtually always against the president, yet substantial discord within the Democratic Party. Second, though partisans show no propensity to consume news depicting inparty unity (vs. disunity), both Republicans and Democrats exhibit a strong tendency to consume news stories depicting disunity in the outparty. Insofar as partisans’ self-exposure to such information is a necessary precondition for attitudinal and behavioral change, these findings have notable implications for how mass media stand to shape partisanship in the United States.
AbramowitzAlan I.WebsterSteven W.2018. “Negative Partisanship: Why Americans Dislike Parties but Behave like Rabid Partisans.” Political Psychology39 (February): 119–35.
2.
AchenChristopher H.BartelsLarry M.2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3.
AhlerDouglas J.SoodGaurav. 2018. “The Parties in Our Heads: Misperceptions about Party Composition and Their Consequences.” The Journal of Politics80 (3): 964–81.
4.
ArceneauxKevinJohnsonMartin. 2013. Changing Minds or Changing Channels? Partisan News in an Age of Choice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
BennettW. LanceIyengarShanto. 2008. “A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication.” Journal of Communication58 (4): 707–31.
9.
BennettW. LanceLawrenceRegina G.LivingstonSteven. 2006. “None Dare Call It Torture: Indexing and the Limits of Press Independence in the Abu Ghraib Scandal.” Journal of Communication56 (3): 467–85.
10.
BestSamuel J.ChmielewskiBrianKruegerBrian S.2005. “Selective Exposure to Online Foreign News during the Conflict with Iraq.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics10 (4): 52–70.
11.
BudakCerenGoelSharadRaoJustin M.2016. “Fair and Balanced? Quantifying Media Bias through Crowdsourced Content Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly80 (S1): 250–71.
12.
CampbellDavid E.GreenJohn C.LaymanGeoffrey C.2011. “The Party Faithful: Partisan Images, Candidate Religion, and the Electoral Impact of Party Identification.” American Journal of Political Science55 (1): 42–58.
ChongDennisDruckmanJames N.2011. “Identifying Frames in Political News.” In Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques, edited by BucyErik P.HolbertR. Lance, 238–67. New York: Routledge.
16.
CohenJeffrey E.2009. “The Presidency and the Mass Media.” In The Oxford Handbook of the American Presidency, edited by EdwardsGeorge C.HowellWilliam G., 254–85. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
CombsDavid J. Y.PowellCaitlin A. J.SchurtzDavid RyanSmithRichard H.2009. “Politics, Schadenfreude, and Ingroup Identification: The Sometimes Happy Thing about a Poor Economy and Death.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology45 (4): 635–46.
DruckmanJames N.PetersonErikSlothuusRune. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review107 (1): 57–79.
21.
EhrichKristine R.IrwinJulie R.2005. “Willful Ignorance in the Request for Product Attribute Information.” Journal of Marketing Research42 (3): 266–77.
22.
FestingerLeon. 1962. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
23.
FlynnD. J.NyhanBrendanReiflerJason. 2017. “The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs about Politics.” Political Psychology 38 (February): 127–50.
24.
GentzkowMatthewShapiroJesse M.2010. “What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily Newspapers.” Econometrica78 (1): 35–71.
25.
GreenDonald P.PalmquistBradleySchicklerEric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
GroelingTim. 2013. “Media Bias by the Numbers: Challenges and Opportunities in the Empirical Study of Partisan News.” Annual Review of Political Science16 (1): 129–51.
29.
GrosecloseTimMilyoJeffrey. 2010. “Sincere versus Sophisticated Voting in Congress: Theory and Evidence.” The Journal of Politics72 (1): 60–73.
30.
GrossmannMattHopkinsDavid A.2015. “Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats: The Asymmetry of American Party Politics.” Perspectives on Politics13 (1): 119–39.
HuddyLeonie. 2018. “The Group Foundations of Democratic Political Behavior.” Critical Review20 (1–2): 1–16.
35.
IyengarShantoHahnKyu S.2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.” Journal of Communication59 (1): 19–39.
36.
IyengarShantoSoodGauravLelkesYphtach. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology a Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly76 (3): 405–31.
37.
JeritJenniferBarabasJason. 2017. “Revisiting the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge.” Political Behavior39 (4): 817–38.
38.
JonesDavid R.2017. “Party Brands, Elections, and Presidential-Congressional Relations.” In Rivals for Power: Presidential-Congressional Relations, 6th ed., 52–74. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
39.
KaneJohn V.2016a. “Are You a Team Player? Party Coalitions, Executives, and Partisan Polarization”. Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, September, Philadelphia.
KaneJohn V.BarabasJason. 2019. “No Harm in Checking: Using Factual Manipulation Checks to Assess Attentiveness in Experiments.” American Journal of Political Science63 (1): 234–49.
42.
LevenduskyMatthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
43.
LevenduskyMatthew. 2013. How Partisan Media Polarize America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
44.
LevenduskyMatthewMalhotraNeil. 2016. “Does Media Coverage of Partisan Polarization Affect Political Attitudes?”Political Communication33 (2): 283–301.
45.
Lewis-BeckMichael S.JacobyWilliam G.NorpothHelmutWeisbergHerbert F.2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
46.
LodgeMiltonTaberCharles S.2013. The Rationalizing Voter. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
MannThomas E.OrnsteinNorman J.2013. It’s Even Worse than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York, NY: Basic Books.
48.
MasonLilliana. 2015. “‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science59 (1): 128–45.
49.
MasonLilliana. 2016. “A Cross-Cutting Calm How Social Sorting Drives Affective Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly80 (S1): 351–77.
50.
MasonLilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
51.
MasonLillianaWronskiJulie. 2018. “One Tribe to Bind Them All: How Our Social Group Attachments Strengthen Partisanship.” Political Psychology 39 (February): 257–77.
RamirezMark D.EricksonNathan. 2014. “Partisan Bias and Information Discounting in Economic Judgments.” Political Psychology35 (3): 401–15.
63.
RobisonJoshuaMullinixKevin J.2016. “Elite Polarization and Public Opinion: How Polarization Is Communicated and Its Effects.” Political Communication33 (2): 261–82.
RothschildJacob E.HowatAdam J.ShafranekRichard M.BusbyEthan C.2018. “Pigeonholing Partisans: Stereotypes of Party Supporters and Partisan Polarization.” Political Behavior. Published electronically March 28. doi:10.1007/s11109-018-9457-5.
68.
RottinghausBrandonTedinKent L.2012. “Presidential ‘Going Bipartisan’ and the Consequences for Institutional Approval.” American Behavioral Scientist56 (12): 1696–717.
69.
ShufeldtGregory. 2018. “Party-Group Ambivalence and Voter Loyalty: Results From Three Experiments.” American Politics Research46 (1): 132–68.
70.
TaberCharles S.LodgeMilton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science50 (3): 755–69.
TraberDeniseHugSimonSciariniPascal. 2014. “Party Unity in the Swiss Parliament: The Electoral Connection.” The Journal of Legislative Studies20 (2): 193–215.
73.
VieraAnthony J.GarrettJoanne M.2005. “Understanding Interobserver Agreement: The Kappa Statistic.” Family Medicine37 (5): 360–63.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
